« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 16   Go Down

Author Topic: No Interview This Anniversary ?  (Read 30695 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #150 on: May 13, 2018, 08:13:26 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on May 13, 2018, 07:43:44 PM
We would indeed jassi so perhaps VS will elucidate?
It was a suggestion same as Jassi made a suggestion, you didn’t ask Jassi to elucidate on hers that the money had run out, why not?
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #151 on: May 13, 2018, 08:18:54 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on May 13, 2018, 08:13:26 PM
It was a suggestion same as Jassi made a suggestion, you didn’t ask Jassi to elucidate on hers that the money had run out, why not?

It was obvious what jassi meant. Your post was less clear so I asked you to elucidate. Please don’t feel I’m picking on you.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #152 on: May 13, 2018, 08:28:27 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on May 13, 2018, 08:18:54 PM
It was obvious what jassi meant. Your post was less clear so I asked you to elucidate. Please don’t feel I’m picking on you.
I do actually.
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #153 on: May 13, 2018, 08:34:46 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on May 13, 2018, 08:28:27 PM
I do actually.

Then it wasn’t meant. I apologise. Now can you please expand on your post ?
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #154 on: May 13, 2018, 08:48:37 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on May 13, 2018, 08:34:46 PM
Then it wasn’t meant. I apologise. Now can you please expand on your post ?
No.
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #155 on: May 13, 2018, 08:54:51 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on May 13, 2018, 08:48:37 PM
No.

I really don’t blame you. Perhaps you should have thought through the logistics of trolls being responsible for the suspension of the OFM website before you posted your opinion ?
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #156 on: May 13, 2018, 09:01:23 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on May 13, 2018, 08:54:51 PM
I really don’t blame you. Perhaps you should have thought through the logistics of trolls being responsible for the suspension of the OFM website before you posted your opinion ?
To be honest, it wasn’t a massively serious suggestion in the first place  but thanks for your valiant attempt to put me down - again.
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #157 on: May 13, 2018, 09:07:20 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on May 13, 2018, 09:01:23 PM
To be honest, it wasn’t a massively serious suggestion in the first place  but thanks for your valiant attempt to put me down - again.

Yet again no attempt at a put down but well done for your valiant, but failed, attempt to gloss over your ridiculous suggestion.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #158 on: May 13, 2018, 10:01:33 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on May 13, 2018, 09:07:20 PM
Yet again no attempt at a put down but well done for your valiant, but failed, attempt to gloss over your ridiculous suggestion.
And that wasn’t a put down either I suppose. 
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #159 on: May 13, 2018, 10:09:58 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on May 13, 2018, 10:01:33 PM
And that wasn’t a put down either I suppose.

No that was called stating a fact.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #160 on: May 13, 2018, 10:23:02 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on May 13, 2018, 10:09:58 PM
No that was called stating a fact.
OK, thanks, it was kind of you.
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #161 on: May 13, 2018, 10:26:48 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on May 13, 2018, 10:23:02 PM
OK, thanks, it was kind of you.

It’s a weakness of mine.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #162 on: May 13, 2018, 10:28:20 PM »
Anyway, not sure what the apparent suspension of the Find Madeleine site has got to do with "No Interview This Anniversary" but let's hope it's back up and running soon, as soon as they've put more money in the meter or booted off the hacker trolls.
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #163 on: May 13, 2018, 10:40:37 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on May 13, 2018, 10:28:20 PM
Anyway, not sure what the apparent suspension of the Find Madeleine site has got to do with "No Interview This Anniversary" but let's hope it's back up and running soon, as soon as they've put more money in the meter or booted off the hacker trolls.

I agree the suspension has nothing to do with the OP.

So what do we know? There is enough money still in the fund according to the accounts in January to pay for the official website. It would appear that the website isn’t down due to maintenance. There is now no facility for supporters to donate to the fund. There is no announcement of the closure of the website on the OFM Facebook page. Indeed the link is still displayed prominently.

So what is going on ?
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: No Interview This Anniversary ?
« Reply #164 on: May 13, 2018, 11:11:21 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on May 13, 2018, 10:40:37 PM
I agree the suspension has nothing to do with the OP.

So what do we know? There is enough money still in the fund according to the accounts in January to pay for the official website. It would appear that the website isn’t down due to maintenance. There is now no facility for supporters to donate to the fund. There is no announcement of the closure of the website on the OFM Facebook page. Indeed the link is still displayed prominently.

So what is going on ?
Might have been hacked by trolls?  Just a possibility to consider, not saying it has.
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 16   Go Up
« previous next »