What is the lie in Amarals book. The truth of the lie.

[Erngath]

Eh ? Can you give a cite where Amaral accused them of fraud and have you still not taken the time to read up on facts in the PJ files ?

Ignoring your rudeness once again.
By accusing them of lying about the abduction, does it not follow that they have committed a huge cover up and fraud.

[Erngath]

Ah, Yes.  All of that money in The Fund, obtained by Fraud.  But didn't Amaral say at some point that this was a problem for The UK?

It would be if Madeleine's parents have told the lie they are accused of telling?

[jassi]

Ignoring your rudeness once again.
By accusing them of lying about the abduction, does it not follow that they have committed a huge cover up and fraud.

Indeed it would, but any financial fraud would be in the UK and as such, outside Portuguese jurisdiction.

[Erngath]

Indeed it would, but any financial fraud would be in the UK and as such, outside Portuguese jurisdiction.

Agreed but by accusing Madeleine's parents of lying, it follows that the other accusations are implicit.

[Snowgirl]

Ignoring your rudeness once again.
By accusing them of lying about the abduction, does it not follow that they have committed a huge cover up and fraud.

You didn’t make it clear what kind of fraud .
His conclusion was that they had taken part in the concealing of a body which is an actual offence iirc .

[jassi]

Agreed but by accusing Madeleine's parents of lying, it follows that the other accusations are implicit.

Yes. What is your problem with that position?

[Erngath]

Yes. What is your problem with that position?

Do I need to have a problem?
In my opinion it's Amaral who has the problem.
He has made accusations which he cannot prove.
I would guess you do not agree.

[Snowgirl]

Do I need to have a problem?
In my opinion it's Amaral who has the problem.
He has made accusations which he cannot prove.
I would guess you do not agree.

How has Amaral a problem ? The Supreme Court ruled he had a right to express his opinion . Added to which I will add and it wasn’t just his conclusion .

[jassi]

Do I need to have a problem?
In my opinion it's Amaral who has the problem.
He has made accusations which he cannot prove.
I would guess you do not agree.

Then you would be wrong.

I don't see that Amaral has any problem regarding the McCanns.
He won the legal case brought  against him.

You do seem to have a problem as regards Amaral.

[Erngath]

Then you would be wrong.

I don't see that Amaral has any problem regarding the McCanns.
He won the legal case brought  against him.

You do seem to have a problem as regards Amaral.

In what way?
Do you think it correct that he has made accusations which he cannot prove?

[faithlilly]

In what way?

Your opinion on the fact that Rebelo appeared to also suspect the parents and their friends as his request for the rogatory interverviews and reconstitution shows ?

[jassi]

In what way?
Do you think it correct that he has made accusations which he cannot prove?

He has made statements that he has not as yet proved.
That does not necessarily  mean those statements are untrue

[Erngath]

He has made statements that he has not as yet proved.
That does not necessarily  mean those statements are untrue

Nor is he likely to prove..
However at the time of writing his book, he  could not prove his accusation to be true.
Did he prove the truth in " The truth of the lie"
The answer seems to be no.

[Snowgirl]

In what way?
Do you think it correct that he has made accusations which he cannot prove?

Nor is he likely to prove..
However at the time of writing his book, he  could not prove his accusation to be true.
Did he prove the truth in " The truth of the lie"
The answer seems to be no.

He ? All by himself ?

[/i]A report by Chief Inspector Tavares de Almeida to the Coordinator of the Criminal Investigation

Where he concludes, after analyzing all the evidence gathered, that the child is dead and the parents were responsible for cadaver occultation, and the entire GROUP was lying since the first day of the investigation.

10 September 2007
(Processo: VOL ,X, p. 2587-2602)PJ Files

[faithlilly]

Nor is he likely to prove..
However at the time of writing his book, he  could not prove his accusation to be true.
Did he prove the truth in " The truth of the lie"
The answer seems to be no.

Rebelo also seemed to believe in the ‘lie’.

Two experienced officers believing the same thing. What do you make of that ?