What is the lie in Amarals book. The truth of the lie.

[jassi]

So you can read the book online but you can't buy a copy from the bookshop.   
OK what link do you use?

Will you permit it on here or would you like it by PM ?

[Eleanor]

is that reply because everything i have posted is fact...are you claiming the pj understanding of the evidence was correct when both the archiving report and Da Carmo contradicts them...the original investigation..the Almeida report...has been shown to be based on a fallacy...taht is fact...not opinion

this is from the report re the inspection of the mccanns car...its totat...total...codswallop


There was also a strong reaction of cadaver odour in the car used by the McCann (since May 27th 2007), which in conjugation with the blood dog and the forensics present in the 'Autos', that indicate the presence of Madeleine McCann's DNA in the booth of the car, are in order not to exclude a strong hypothesis that this car may have been used to transport the cadaver, 24 days after the death;

It's "Used to Transport the Cadaver 24 Days after the Death"  that leaves me thinking that Amaral had lost the plot.

[G-Unit]

yet again you have failed to address the total misunderstanding of the important evidence by the pj

You posted a statement of what you seem to believe are facts. I said you are not speaking for me.

[kizzy]

So you can read the book online but you can't buy a copy from the bookshop.   
OK what link do you use?

I use this one - although there are several.



http://goncaloamaraltruthofthelie.blogspot.com/2009/06/chapter-1.html


The chapters are to the left

[Mr Gray]

You posted a statement of what you seem to believe are facts. I said you are not speaking for me.

I never claimed to be speaking for you...and I stated an absolute fact which is borne out by evidence...you obviously wish to ignore the evidence

[Robittybob1]

I use this one - although there are several.



http://goncaloamaraltruthofthelie.blogspot.com/2009/06/chapter-1.html


The chapters are to the left

OK so from the beginning I will identify what I think were lies.

[jassi]

OK so from the beginning I will identify what I think were lies.

What's the point?
Pretty much a waste of time as at the end of the day  it'll only be an opinion

[Venturi Swirl]

You seemed to be using the Royal 'we', I just wondered who you were speaking for in addition to yourself, that's all. Not for me, obviously.

He was speaking for all those people who can think logically and can draw coorrect evidence based conclusions.  If that excludes you then, fair enough.

[Alice Purjorick]

What's the point?
Pretty much a waste of time as at the end of the day  it'll only be an opinion

Especially as two courts have ruled on the matter years ago.
It's a bit like an "O" Level physics student saying " I'll read Tim O'Shenko and tell you where he's talking blx".

[G-Unit]

He was speaking for all those people who can think logically and can draw coorrect evidence based conclusions.  If that excludes you then, fair enough.

Do you mean he was speaking for you by any chance? That's two of you then.

[Venturi Swirl]

Do you mean he was speaking for you by any chance? That's two of you then.

Yes I agree with him, why don’t you?

[G-Unit]

Yes I agree with him, why don’t you?

So far 'we' seems to consist of two people then.

[Mr Gray]

So far 'we' seems to consist of two people then.

It certainly doesn't...DA Carmo has said there is no evidence to suggest the mccsns, are involved... The archiving report said no evidence... SY are clearly not investigating the parents... You need to look at the evidence... And as regards evidence.. Almeidas report is seriously flawed

[Venturi Swirl]

So far 'we' seems to consist of two people then.

Do you think it’s only two?  How quaint.  Perhaps you could explain why you don’t, or is that beyond or beneath you?

[G-Unit]

Do you think it’s only two?  How quaint.  Perhaps you could explain why you don’t, or is that beyond or beneath you?

I have evidence of one person agreeing with Davel so far. Perhaps others will emerge in time.