Re "financial support", the situation is so unbalanced. Is it fair that one side appears to have top UK and PT lawyers paid for by one or more rich funders, and the other side has absolutely no such funding?
Is the law ever a level playing field?
Were I libelled I would just have to grin and bear it as I would be unable to afford to go to court. If Victoria Beckham suffered exactly the same libel and was as outraged as I ... she could afford the best legal representation possible to contest the libel in court. (Sigh ... that is not the only difference between Victoria and myself.)
It is my opinion that Goncalo Amaral's situation is entirely of his own making and his illegal actions as outlined by a Portuguese Court the fault of no-one but himself.
I believe it was his arrogance in thinking the McCanns would not sue which has led to this impasse, and his vendetta against Leonor Cipriano's lawyer which cost him dearly should have taught him some caution.
In any case, he seems to have plenty of donations to his fund to enable him to contest the judgement of the Portuguese Court, which when considered, illustrates the actions of a corrupt ex public official who took pains to deny the victims of a horrendous crime their presumption of innocence.
I think the Portuguese people have very probably had their fill of such as scandal after scandal erupts involving the corruption of those in public office.
This is merely another such scandal ... and it is laudable that individuals may wish to dig into their pockets to defend it ... however it should be remembered Goncalo Amaral had his day in a lawfully constituted court, unlike the McCanns who are tried and condemned every day of their lives in kangaroo courts set up in many instances by the vilest of people.