Gonçalo Amaral confirms he will appeal the damages decision to higher Court.

[G-Unit]

I repeat

Natasha Donn???  !

I want proper evidence Amaral has been granted leave to appeal.

To put flesh on my objection, Natasha Donn lends credence to the work of phoney criminal "profiler" Pat Brown:

http://www.jornal123.com/en/Articles/2-1520/American_Criminal_Profiler_probes_McCann_mystery

Perhaps a nice British newspaper can convince you;

Mr Amaral’s legal team have leave to appeal the award.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/11568725/Madeleine-McCanns-parents-awarded-357k-in-Portuguese-libel-case.html

[stephen25000]

Perhaps a nice British newspaper can convince you;

Mr Amaral’s legal team have leave to appeal the award.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/11568725/Madeleine-McCanns-parents-awarded-357k-in-Portuguese-libel-case.html

I am sure ferryman can now look forward to the next stage.

 

[G-Unit]

I am sure ferryman can now look forward to the next stage.

 

I just hope he remembers that the question has been answered because I'm pretty sure it's been answered previously on the thread.

[ferryman]

Perhaps a nice British newspaper can convince you;

Mr Amaral’s legal team have leave to appeal the award.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/11568725/Madeleine-McCanns-parents-awarded-357k-in-Portuguese-libel-case.html

The Daily Telegraph report, written hard on the heels of the McCanns' first-round victory, merely confirms that Amaral had the option of lodging an appeal.

It doesn't actually say that he had and, indeed, that close to conclusion of the first round he (then!) couldn't have.

[mercury]

The Daily Telegraph report, written hard on the heels of the McCanns' first-round victory, merely confirms that Amaral had the option of lodging an appeal.

It doesn't actually say that he had and, indeed, that close to conclusion of the first round he (then!) couldn't have.

Does that mean, pages later, you still don't accept that one has been filed?

Does it mean you think the court docket is a forgery, that both Amaral and the said Portugal Resident journalist are both lying? You could include the blogger Astro in that list as well if you like. I really cannot understand where you are coming from on this issue.

[G-Unit]

Does that mean, pages later, you still don't accept that one has been filed?

Does it mean you think the court docket is a forgery, that both Amaral and the said Portugal Resident journalist are both lying? You could include the blogger Astro in that list as well if you like. I really cannot understand where you are coming from on this issue.

You know, I know, we all know the appeal has been filed. I don't intend to take part in this foolish discussion any more.

[Mr Gray]

You know, I know, we all know the appeal has been filed. I don't intend to take part in this foolish discussion any more.

There is no appeal yet...amaral has filed an application citing his grounds. The court will then decide an appeal is allowed

[stephen25000]

There is no appeal yet...amaral has filed an application citing his grounds. The court will then decide an appeal is allowed

Wrong.

There will be an appeal.

Try comprehending what you have read on here.

It has been explained.

[Mr Gray]

Wrong.

There will be an appeal.

Try comprehending what you have read on here.

It has been explained.

If he has grounds...there will be an appeal

[stephen25000]

If he has grounds...there will be an appeal

Read again.

[Mr Gray]

Read again.

I don't need to read anything..it's basic law

[stephen25000]

I don't need to read anything..it's basic law

Read what Montclair said.

it's all there.

[Benice]

Does anyone know what happened when Amaral appealed against his criminal conviction re Leonor Cipriano? 

Was that accepted by the Judge at the first attempt, or did he have to go to a higher court to get the appeal heard?  Was it actually heard at all - or was it not allowed to be heard?    All I know is that it failed - whether it failed to be heard or was heard and then thrown out -  I don't know.

Anyone got any info on this?   It might give us a clue as to how these things work in practise - although I realise  that his previous failed appeal was in a Criminal court and so might not apply to this appeal.

[Mr Gray]

Does anyone know what happened when Amaral appealed against his criminal conviction re Leonor Cipriano? 

Was that accepted by the Judge at the first attempt, or did he have to go to a higher court to get the appeal heard?  Was it actually heard at all - or was it not allowed to be heard?    All I know is that it failed - whether it failed to be heard or was heard and then thrown out -  I don't know.

Anyone got any info on this?   It might give us a clue as to how these things work in practise - although I realise  that his previous failed appeal was in a Criminal court and so might not apply to this appeal.

Im sure Montclair will know all the details.... Or not

[Carana]

Does anyone know what happened when Amaral appealed against his criminal conviction re Leonor Cipriano? 

Was that accepted by the Judge at the first attempt, or did he have to go to a higher court to get the appeal heard?  Was it actually heard at all - or was it not allowed to be heard?    All I know is that it failed - whether it failed to be heard or was heard and then thrown out -  I don't know.

Anyone got any info on this?   It might give us a clue as to how these things work in practise - although I realise  that his previous failed appeal was in a Criminal court and so might not apply to this appeal.

It seems that the appeal went through, but the court upheld the ruling.


18 March 2011

The Appellate Court of Évora did not approve the appeals of the two Judiciary Police officers who were convicted in Leonor Cipriano’s trial and decided to maintain the ruling made at the court of first instance...

https://madeleinemccannthetruth.wordpress.com/2011/10/31/evoras-court-upheld-the-pj-officers-convictions/


Joana Case: Court keeps sentences on former pj inspectors

The Évora Court refuted the existence of "unconstitutionality and nullity" in judgment which upheld the conviction of former inspectors of the Judicial Police (PJ) in the case of attacks on Leonor Cipriano, Joana's mother of child missing in the Algarve in 2004.

On 18 March this year, the Court of Appeal upheld the conviction of former PJ inspector Gonçalo Amaral and António Nunes Cardoso, with suspended sentences, the Court of Faro in 2009, but the latter former agent requested "clarification and reform of judgment. "

According to judicial sources, the Évora Court understood that "lacks reason," the application of António Nunes Cardoso, sentenced to two years and three months imprisonment with suspended sentence for the crime of document forgery. Understand yet the appellate court that the appeal of Évora "surpasses fully the scope allowed to a request for clarification or adduction of errors, oversights, or obscurities nonentities."

In the decision of the resources of the former inspectors, reported on 18 March 2011, the Court / Relation also maintained the sentence of one year and six months in prison for the crime of making false allegations, suspended on probation, applied to Gonçalo Amaral, former coordinator of the Criminal Investigation Department in Portimão.

http://www.dn.pt/inicio/portugal/interior.aspx?content_id=1882361&page=-1&success=1