Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
No thank god.  He should be struck off for emailing Hazel.  He has sly underhand tactics and no evidence to prove CB is innocent.
You need evidence to prove guilt, not innocence.
2
Know him personally do you ?

No thank god.  He should be struck off for emailing Hazel.  He has sly underhand tactics and no evidence to prove CB is innocent.
3
You don't have to know him.  You just need to look at him.
Yeah, just looking at him intimidating that female reporter in the article I linked to, gross.
7
Pleased to hear that I am not the only one trying to make sense of what is being said there.

Not sure that we, as casual observers, are expected to make sense of any of the proceedings as reporting seems to be selective and incomplete.
I guess the judges will have a grip on things, which is the important thing.
10
Rogue coppers covering themselves with rouge... Whatever next?  Little hope for Jezz with cacographers on his team...
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10