11
Media reports provided on this forum are for information only.
Endorsement of such material is neither intended nor implied.
* Posters are asked to keep to thread topics where possible
* Libellous or defamatory material will be removed on sight
* Abuse will not be tolerated. Break the rules expect a ban!
Contact > admin@miscarriageofjustice.co
Praia da Luz - Live webcams
Fulscher up to his usual disgraceful tricks by trying to get Hazel Behan's evidence declared inadmissible.
From The Guardian...
Wednesday’s hearing was delayed for more than an hour after Brückner’s defence lawyer, Friedrich Fülscher, lodged an objection to the official translation of Behan’s 2020 interview with Germany’s criminal police, the BKA. He claimed that the police officer who had interviewed her had not been qualified to do so, thus rendering the interview null and void.The judge, Uta Engemann, rejected the objection, paving the way for Behan to give her evidence.
Usual rubbish. Seen it on the documentary, read it in the book. So Mitchell must be innocent. Not understanding, or not willing to understand, that what they have watched/read is only 5% of what this case is about. They lack the common sense to investigate farther. They are the same types to cry that covid is a hoax, getting jab is just being microchip, that trans people are infringing there rights blah blah. What theses types can't do, is focus on innocence, without pointing the finger at others. That is where Lean comes in and the misinformation she infects there brains with. How many times do you read, these types shouting about moped at walls? Not true. Or about changed statements? How many times did the Mitchell's change there's? How about Mitchell's clothes ripped off him by the police? Not true, he handled them over. I could go on. One thing they will never mention though, is SM >> GAME OVER.I don't think that Covid-19 was a hoax. I got the vaccine for it and many others. [Name removed] did change her statement. I never said ripped; what I said was that one only takes fingernail scrapings from victims and from suspected perpetrators, let alone clothing. I think that the police bullied SM; I also think that both sides have said things about his testimony that were not entirely true. As for pointing fingers, I advise letting the forensics identify persons of interest.
Fulscher up to his usual disgraceful tricks by trying to get Hazel Behan's evidence declared inadmissible.Desperation.
From The Guardian...
Wednesday’s hearing was delayed for more than an hour after Brückner’s defence lawyer, Friedrich Fülscher, lodged an objection to the official translation of Behan’s 2020 interview with Germany’s criminal police, the BKA. He claimed that the police officer who had interviewed her had not been qualified to do so, thus rendering the interview null and void.The judge, Uta Engemann, rejected the objection, paving the way for Behan to give her evidence.
Day 13:
Brueckner's day of reckoning?...
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/27925647/madeleine-mccann-suspect-raped-holiday-rep-knifepoint/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13420651/irish-woman-raped-christian-brueckner-terrifying-ordeal-lied-pregnant-stop.html
He was forensically aware (as per his telling the police "it's not a full match if you only have some dna")...LM's words only mean that he was good at analytical reasoning. Being forensically aware means taking precautions to guard against transfer of materials per Locard's principle.