Advocates for Jeremy Bamber

[Nicholas]

So why didn't the relatives take Crispy?  After all they were pretty keen to take everything else!

The relatives weren’t given the option

The vet in question didn’t set up practice until 1986.

Bamber manipulated the vet as he initially did the police

[Myster]

Or a husband's.


 

Veet works wonders, but you need to be careful where it's applied.

[puglove]

Veet works wonders, but you need to be careful where it's applied.

Blimey, don't tell him that. He's used to a quick squirt of WD40 and an angle grinder.


 

[Nicholas]

Bamber...

Crispy, June's dog and Bruce, the farm dog we put in the care of a vet. Bruce was rehomed to another farm very quickly however no one would take Crispy. The VET recommended he be put to sleep.

The vet's w/s...

"On my arrival Mr Jeremy Bamber told me that he wished me to put down the Shih Tzu dog that had belonged to Mrs Bamber, his mother. He said that the dog was very attached to his mother, and since her death, he thought that the dog should not go to another home." . He also said that the dog had turned a bit nasty since the killings at WHF and it was a bit snappy.

So Crispy had suddenly turned nasty in the space of a few hours?  Absolute balderdash!

I know who to believe.

Someone tweeted this https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xT52ITEhcqI which reminded me of Bamber’s comment,

“If only dogs could talk”

[Holly Goodhead]

Justice 4 Crispy!!

What's a Shih Tzu?   One with no elephants.

As an adoptee you would think JB might have had more empathy for Crispy, effectively orphaned 

[Caroline]

As an adoptee you would think JB might have had more empathy for Crispy, effectively orphaned 

As a human being you would think Bamber might have had more empathy for Crispy. Defo lack of empathy all around.

[Nicholas]

NGB made a post recently on the Bamber forum regarding JM and the possibility of her having been arrested?

There’s no evidence to suggest she was* but in the Simon Hall case, it didn’t become clear to me that Jamie Barker had also been arrested and questioned under caution by Suffolk police and considered a possible suspect until around the time of the Zenith burglary discovery in 2012/13. It was following this that I recognised Simon Hall and all his previous legal representatives had never requested full disclosure on this fact - either pre-trial nor in the years that followed.

*Someone would have surely got wind of JM having been arrested, one of her friends around the time for example, and spilled the beans before now?

I found it interesting when NGB raised this on the Bamber board and wondered how long he’d considered this to be a possibility?

Re ‘all previous legal representatives had never requested full disclosure on this fact’ should include, that I’m aware of


Jeremy Bamber wrote the following in 2012:

Julie Mugford and Elizabeth Rimmington
Essex Police were convinced on the basis of all available evidence that Sheila had killed the family and committed suicide. On the 7th September 1985 Elizabeth Rimmington telephoned Witham Police Station to say that Julie Mugford was withholding vital evidence in the White House Farm enquiry. This was at 4pm. This telephone call was documented as Telephone Report Number One. The exact content of this telephone call from Ms Rimmington is still a mystery as Essex Police continue to withhold this document from the Defence.

This is the sequence of events
5:00pm D.S. Stan Jones goes to the address of Malcolm Waters and takes Julie Mugford into custody. (HOLMES 64/13 and 1/12)

While in custody at Witham Julie asked that her father is contacted so she can talk to him. (HOLMES 5/10)

Julie Mugford was interviewed under caution. (HOLMES 1/49)

7:00pm to 10:40pm D.S. Jones and D.I. Miller interviewed Juilie together. 11:00pm to 02:00am D.C.I. Jones interviewed Julie.

The taped record and written record of Julie Mugford’s interviews on 7th September 1985 remain undisclosed.
Brett Collins, Mathew MacDonald, Christine Bacon and I were all arrested on the 8th September with:-

“Suspicion of being concerned with the murder of June and Nevill Bamber, Sheila, Daniel and Nicholas Caffell.”

So, there is every reason to suspect that Julie was taken into custody for the same reason

Page 3 & 4 here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5DLsf0UggyWeUVwcWFTT1JkaEE/view

Why does Bamber ‘suspect’ it was for the same reason?

[Nicholas]

Poppy Ann Miller     ....................    Profile: Psychosomatic Counsellor and Healer. Working with dreams and pre-cognition.



 
Essex UK

Justice4Jeremy-Evidence of Collusion

Much of the tainting of Jeremy Bamber’s trial was conducted around a second sound moderator (gun silencer) which was introduced by Jeremy’s relatives over a month after the crime was committed.  Instead of questioning this sudden appearance Essex Police and others chose instead, to collude with it.
Documents intended for Public Interest Immunity (PII) were ‘inadvertently’ sent to Jeremy.  PII is a principle of common law under which English courts can grant an Order allowing one litigant to keep evidence from the sight of the other litigants if they consider disclosure to be damaging to public interest.  So it is clear that the plan was for these documents to be buried, safely out-of-sight, intended never to see the light-of-day

Jeremy’s most recent eight page letter to me provides an in-depth account of what he has found within these documents.  Jeremy’s letters are handwritten.  He writes in detail including reference and exhibit numbers revealing proof of what he has always maintained – his innocence. Details of documents which evidence beyond dispute the existence of two sound moderators and the ‘losing’, editing and re-writing of crucial evidence.  Jeremy has given me permission to reveal his entire letter and the corruption of documents which he has discovered.  I shall not record it all here though will forward relevant information to the City of London Police (COLP), the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and the Home Secretary.

For those of us who believe that the administrators of justice in our so-called Great Britain, would not comprehend such malpractice and deceit, Jeremy states on more than one occasion, ‘I have the documents to prove it’.

The following are direct quotes from Jeremy’s letter and for brevity I have paraphrased others.

‘COLP (City of London Police) discovered that Glynis Howard and her assistant Leslie Tucker; John Hayward and his assistant, Andrew Palmer; Brian Elliott and his assistant, Louise Float and Malcolm Fletcher all signed a set of falsified documents for a second sound moderator to create a chain of evidence paper trail capable of deceiving the jury and it did.......I have their lab notes.’
‘They(sound moderators) are both the same, Parker-Hale MM1 type and someone simply took SBJ/1 out of its cardboard tube packaging and slipped in DB/1 that had been contaminated with red paint from the scene.
‘And in any event they admitted this to COLP in 1991 but COLP and Essex Police just covered it up under PII.  John Hayward took photos of SBJ/1 on 12th Sept ’85, well him and his assistant Andrew Palmer, COLP showed these photos to Brian Elliott in 1991 and asked, “Is that the same sound moderator you examined?” 

Elliott replied indicating that he did not accept it could be the same one and provides an explanation as to why that is the case, including a description of how the sound moderator he examined differed from the one in the photo in relation to the positioning of red paint on it.

‘Everyone examined the sound moderator under a  microscope as well as by eye and it’s clear that the first one SBJ/1 had blood on it and this smear of red paint and the second one DB/1 was switched with SBJ/1 after being sent to the lab on 20/Sept/85.’
‘I can prove every word of the above – I have all the PII primary documents showing exactly how my relatives and Essex Police and the forensic scientists at Huntingdon and COLP and PCA (now the IPCC) all worked together to either directly corrupt the sound moderator evidence or actively assisted in concealing that Essex Police found SBJ/1 and it was switched between 20th and 25th Sept ’85 at Huntingdon Forensic Laboratory with DB/1 that had been used to scratch and score the kitchen mantle shelf at White House Farm to falsely implicate me as a murderer. ....I have the documents showing that it was.......These are the document references: Exhibit signed by Glynis Howard, Malcolm Fletched, John Hayward and Brian Elliott:- ‘Police Crime Number’ SC/786/85, ‘Description of Article ‘Silencer’ DB/1, crossed out, and DRB/1 in brackets:- Serial Number 22, as the identification marker.’

Jeremy has no doubt that lawyers, judiciary as well as the Home Office must have known about this; and what about the media?  Considering the damage much of the press did in promulgating biased views, influencing public opinion through their coverage of Jeremy’s case, I wonder if they will attempt to compensate in some small way by publishing this evidence?  The truth!  Though I appreciate it might be difficult for them to recognise the truth 'even if it jumped up and bit them in the face!'.
I feel it reprehensible that those to whom we look for justice would rather lie and deceive than admit they were wrong.  That those who set themselves up in public office as upholders of the 'Law', can collude to send an innocent man to prison and then leave him there for TWENTY FIVE YEARS rather than face up to their own shortcomings.
It doesn’t bear thinking about and maybe some people would rather not think about the enormity of the true crime here.  Heartbreaking.
I do not believe there is a Heaven for the just and a Hell for the unjust but for one brief moment there I wished there were!


Posted by Poppy Ann Miller on twitter 8 October 2011

http://poppymeze.blogspot.com/2011/10/justice4jeremy-evidence-of-collusion.html

The only ‘proof’ Bamber details is of his apparent innocence fraud

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Re ‘all previous legal representatives had never requested full disclosure on this fact’ should include, that I’m aware of


Jeremy Bamber wrote the following in 2012:

Julie Mugford and Elizabeth Rimmington
Essex Police were convinced on the basis of all available evidence that Sheila had killed the family and committed suicide. On the 7th September 1985 Elizabeth Rimmington telephoned Witham Police Station to say that Julie Mugford was withholding vital evidence in the White House Farm enquiry. This was at 4pm. This telephone call was documented as Telephone Report Number One. The exact content of this telephone call from Ms Rimmington is still a mystery as Essex Police continue to withhold this document from the Defence.

This is the sequence of events
5:00pm D.S. Stan Jones goes to the address of Malcolm Waters and takes Julie Mugford into custody. (HOLMES 64/13 and 1/12)

While in custody at Witham Julie asked that her father is contacted so she can talk to him. (HOLMES 5/10)

Julie Mugford was interviewed under caution. (HOLMES 1/49)

7:00pm to 10:40pm D.S. Jones and D.I. Miller interviewed Juilie together. 11:00pm to 02:00am D.C.I. Jones interviewed Julie.

The taped record and written record of Julie Mugford’s interviews on 7th September 1985 remain undisclosed.
Brett Collins, Mathew MacDonald, Christine Bacon and I were all arrested on the 8th September with:-

“Suspicion of being concerned with the murder of June and Nevill Bamber, Sheila, Daniel and Nicholas Caffell.”

So, there is every reason to suspect that Julie was taken into custody for the same reason

Page 3 & 4 here:

Why does Bamber ‘suspect’ it was for the same reason?

I may be wrong, but I’m sure I read police interviews weren’t recorded in 1985?

I’ve never read that JM was arrested?

This must just another of JB’s mad lies...