Was it Tuesday or Wednesday night?

[stephen25000]

Amaral is relevant to every thread concerning Madeleine McCann's case.

In what way Brietta ?

Madeleine's disappearance has nothing to do with Amaral.

[Robittybob1]

In what way Brietta ?

Madeleine's disappearance has nothing to do with Amaral.

Don't you say it is still unsolved, so it is not possible to say who is involved at this stage.  OK it would seem to be very unlikely that Amaral was involved.

[G-Unit]

Did you explain why you think "he places the writing on Tuesday 1st"?

Because that's what he writes in his book.

[Mr Gray]

I think you've got the point I'm trying to make. As there are several possible explanations anyone accusing him of lying needs to add a caveat. Otherwise they are posting their opinion as a fact.

I think you have got the message... or doesnt really understand the evidence...both options put him in a poor light. I cant see any others ...can you..



so you criticise posters for sating opinion as fact but seem to think its acceptable for amaral...it isnt

[G-Unit]

I think you have got the message...he is either lying or doesnt really understand the evidence...both options put him in a poor light. I cant see any others ...can you..

Not only that... I dont think either you or stephen are aware of what he says in the documentary that was the subject of the court case. Amaral is continually posting his opinion as fact...it isnt

so you criticise posters for sating opinion as fact but seem to think its acceptable for amaral...it isnt

I'm encouraged to see that you have also accepted that calling him a liar isn't the only option. I have no objection to his thesis being debated and criticised, that's why the forum exists. The forum has rules, though, which Amaral isn't bound by because he doesn't post here AFAIK.

[Alice Purjorick]

That appears to be contradicted by the fact that they are not suspects as far as the present active investigation is concerned.

As in unequivocally and/or incontrovertibly or merely in your opinion?

[Mr Gray]

I'm encouraged to see that you have also accepted that calling him a liar isn't the only option. I have no objection to his thesis being debated and criticised, that's why the forum exists. The forum has rules, though, which Amaral isn't bound by because he doesn't post here AFAIK.

The forum rules, are supposed  to be there because it is unfair to post opinion as, fact
Especially  when you, are accusing two people of serious criminal acts
So what, amaral is doing is unfair and wrong... And not just imo

He must be, aware of the statements of Harrison  and grime are the dogs but he chooses to ignore  them



If I can't tell the truth it isn't worth posting

[stephen25000]

Posters are reminded yet again, not to refer to others as liars, as per John's instructions.

[Alice Purjorick]

The forum rules, are supposed  to be there because it is unfair to post opinion as, fact
Especially  when you, are accusing two people of serious criminal acts
So what, amaral is doing is unfair and wrong... And not just imo

He must be, aware of the statements of Harrison  and grime are the dogs but he chooses to ignore  them



If I can't tell the truth it isn't worth posting

Seemingly only from a moral standpoint and not a legal standpoint ?

[G-Unit]

The forum rules, are supposed  to be there because it is unfair to post opinion as, fact
Especially  when you, are accusing two people of serious criminal acts
So what, amaral is doing is unfair and wrong... And not just imo

He must be, aware of the statements of Harrison  and grime are the dogs but he chooses to ignore  them



If I can't tell the truth it isn't worth posting

You need to understand the difference between what you can say on this forum and what Amaral can say elsewhere.

[misty]

I think you have got the message... or doesnt really understand the evidence...both options put him in a poor light. I cant see any others ...can you..



so you criticise posters for sating opinion as fact but seem to think its acceptable for amaral...it isnt

The 3rd option is that much of the material in the online files has either been distorted or fabricated, thus leading us, as posters, to the wrong conclusions.

[misty]

There was a room allocated in Block 6 to the PJ for a period of time after Madeleine's disappearance. Is anybody able to suggest why Mrs Fenn didn't just pop over to a room which was a stone's throw from her own apartment & tell the PJ about the crying & burglary incidents?

[Brietta]

As in unequivocally and/or incontrovertibly or merely in your opinion?

“Neither her parents or any of the members of the group that were with her are either persons of interest or suspects”
~DCI Andy Redwood

In my opinion I would say that is an unequivocal and incontrovertible statement.  You may make of it what you will.

[sadie]

Seemingly only from a moral standpoint and not a legal standpoint ?

It should be from both but I expect he will get away with it.... as he usually does

[Brietta]

The 3rd option is that much of the material in the online files has either been distorted or fabricated, thus leading us, as posters, to the wrong conclusions.

Is Duarte Levy a trustworthy source ... there is at least one individual I know of who hasn't any doubt that he may be less than trustworthy.