Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?

[Mr Gray]

I have seen sites with threads aimed at named individuals such as Amaral and Grime. I don't think they are members.

Depends if they are criticising their professional performance... Which is legitimate and not the same as the abuse directed at the mccanns

[slartibartfast]

Depends if they are criticising their professional performance... Which is legitimate and not the same as the abuse directed at the mccanns

Actually you have got that the wrong way round IMO.

Fellow professionals criticising someone if fine, layman isn’t and can be libellous. It is legitimate to criticise someone’s everyday behaviour based on fact.

[Mr Gray]

Actually you have got that the wrong way round IMO.

Fellow professionals criticising someone if fine, layman isn’t and can be libellous. It is legitimate to criticise someone’s everyday behaviour based on fact.

No it's, quite legitimate for a layman to criticise a professional based on fact... SYare constantly criticised here... Not always on fact

Brunt as, a journalist is criticised

[Mr Gray]

Actually you have got that the wrong way round IMO.

Fellow professionals criticising someone if fine, layman isn’t and can be libellous. It is legitimate to criticise someone’s everyday behaviour based on fact.

Brenda went far beyond criticism... She was abusive according to the police

[G-Unit]

No it's, quite legitimate for a layman to criticise a professional based on fact... SYare constantly criticised here... Not always on fact

Brunt as, a journalist is criticised

There's a difference between criticism and abuse.

[Mr Gray]

There's a difference between criticism and abuse.

I agree... Brenda was, abusive

[Erngath]

Actually you have got that the wrong way round IMO.

Fellow professionals criticising someone if fine, layman isn’t and can be libellous. It is legitimate to criticise someone’s everyday behaviour based on fact.

Really?

So a lay person cannot criticise their own doctor, dentist, their child's teacher.?

[Mr Gray]

Actually you have got that the wrong way round IMO.

Fellow professionals criticising someone if fine, layman isn’t and can be libellous. It is legitimate to criticise someone’s everyday behaviour based on fact.

Just Re read your post and you are quite wrong... It is quite legitimate  for a layman to criticise a professional... Doesn't have to be libellous ...try reading sone feedback from patients on NHS sites

[G-Unit]

I agree... Brenda was, abusive

And others have abused Amaral and Grime in my opinion.

[Erngath]

I have seen sites with threads aimed at named individuals such as Amaral and Grime. I don't think they are members.

Have either Amaral or Grime been stalked at work, leaflets dropped through their neighbours letter boxes.,their children photographed, places where their children went to play visited.??

[Mr Gray]

And others have abused Amaral and Grime in my opinion.

I haven't seen either accused of criminal offences they have not even been arrested for or use of the word hatred, towards them... Abuse has many levels... Can you cite any abuse towards amaral or grime at the level towards the mccanns

[Robittybob1]

One way or the other it has to stop.

[Mr Gray]

And others have abused Amaral and Grime in my opinion.

As a professional you should expect criticism and learn from it... That's what I do

[Sunny]

One way or the other it has to stop.

What exactly has to stop Rob?

Questioning professionals in the Madeleine case appears to be fair game there fore surely questioning what the couple will also be acceptable.

I agree abuse and hatred including threats must stop but they must stop from both sides.

You also say "one way or the other it has to stop" does this mean that you agree with those who created the dossier and sent to to the media

Just a few thoughts and my opinion of course.

[G-Unit]

Have either Amaral or Grime been stalked at work, leaflets dropped through their neighbours letter boxes.,their children photographed, places where their children went to play visited.??

I have no intention of playing the 'this abuse was worse than that abuse' game. No laws have been broken and all abuse is wrong whichever form it takes and whoever it's directed at. Anyone who disapproves of abuse should condemn all abuse in my opinion.