Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?

[Angelo222]

she did not tell him anything until after the doorstepping...even then he did not realise she was serious...whats the point in an discussion forum if you are going to remove posdts just to make your own point

She told him but he didn't think she was serious.  So pathetic!!

[Mr Gray]

She told him but he didn't think she was serious.  So pathetic!!

so he didnt know before the doorstepping

[Angelo222]

so he didnt know before the doorstepping

He knew before the footage was aired and that is what counts.

ETA. Any further disruptive posts will not be tolerated.

[Erngath]

Says more about them in reality imo.

Says what about "them"?

[Mr Gray]

He knew before the footage was aired and that is what counts.

ETA. Any further disruptive posts will not be tolerated.

is a disruptive post on ethat disagrees with you

[Robittybob1]

I put on the supporters thread that all supporters appear to agree with everything a supporter does. Brenda's case is a good point. None here will say they were part of the dossier gang yet every one agrees with the media onslaught that Brenda faced.

I am sure if he were asked, that Martin Brunt would not do his doorstepping of Brenda but all supporters on here are glad he did it appears regardless of the consequences.

And yet they claim that sceptics are heartless.

Davel your last post is a good example of the above.

So they deserve  the, death penalty... Lol...why dont you statrt a petition...death penalty for dossier compiling...just to show what a rational person you are

You are treating Brenda's death as a joke.   I doubt others agree with you.

Suicide is a personal choice.  I don't get any satisfaction from that.  Mind you if someone I detested committed suicide maybe I'd be glad that part is over.  It is pretty hard to be fully forgiving to everyone.  I'm a Christian - "forgive those who who trespass against us etc" but do I really do that?   

She told him.  Did you miss the evidence he gave to the coroner?

Probably  I don't make a point of studying this case.

[Angelo222]

is a disruptive post on ethat disagrees with you

It is against forum rules to post false information in order to support an argument.

[Erngath]

It is against forum rules to post false information in order to support an argument.

Are you absolutely sure that what Davel posted is "false"?

[Angelo222]

Are you absolutely sure that what Davel posted is "false"?

Absolutely.  According to Brunt himself, BL told him that she was contemplating suicide but that she had had a drink and spoken to her son and felt better now.   Alarm bells ringing yet they still aired the footage. 

[Angelo222]

No one knew brenda had, mental health issues, apart from her family.... They are, the ones, who should have helped her....brenda was free to abuse... Sky was, free to name and shame her....

This was the post I strongly objected to.  It was false and misleading. Brunt knew about her mental health issue so should have stood back immediately.  I don't know what sanctimonious selfserving code Sky operates to but it stinks frankly.  The coroner let Sky News off far too lightly imo.

[Erngath]

Absolutely.  According to Brunt himself, BL told him that she was contemplating suicide but that she had had a drink and spoken to her son and felt better now.   Alarm bells ringing yet they still aired the footage.

I see my original post answering this has gone.
Surely he only knew once he had spoken to her.
She invited him into her home later on that day.
The footage had been shown before .then.

[Erngath]

This was the post I strongly objected to.  It was false and misleading. Brunt knew about her mental health issue so should have stood back immediately.  I don't know what sanctimonious selfserving code Sky operates to but it stinks frankly.  The coroner let Sky News off far too lightly imo.

Thats something you should take up with Sky.

[Angelo222]

I see my original post answering this has gone.
Surely he only knew once he had spoken to her.
She invited him into her home later on that day.
The footage had been shown before .then.

I think you are confused as to the timing. The footage was aired after she invited him into her home. Contrary to what some people think, the whole sorry episode was recorded, it was not aired live.

[Angelo222]

Thats something you should take up with Sky.

That particular ship has sailed.

[Erngath]

I think you are confused as to the timing. The footage was aired after she invited him into her home. Contrary to what some people think, the whole sorry episode was recorded, it was not aired live.

Well it's certainly contrary to what I believe to be true.
The first footage saw her driving away with a friend in a car.
Later on that day the story continued with Brunt saying that when she came back she invited her into her home.