"no evidence" to support a theory missing girl Madeleine McCann is alive

[Robittybob1]

found this on here of all places....lol....

seems like the PJ didn't want that pic after all....

and definitely not a close up....

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7041.0


quote from carana

Total likes: 1402
Newbie
View Profile  Personal Message (Offline)

Re: The Portuguese police and Madeleine McCann's eye defect.
« Reply #14 on: February 06, 2016, 04:31:01 PM »
Quote


But Portuguese police, whose investigations usually operate in secret, always opposed the publicity and did not even want the child’s photograph to be distributed.

Mr Anjos told Radio 4’s Inside Stories programme: “We thought that the photos should not show the distinct mark Madeleine had in her eye.

“From our experience of criminal investigations, if this was a kidnap – which is what we believed from the start – the revealing of such a distinct feature would put that person’s life in danger.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492085/Madeleine-campaign-life-danger.html

That is quite an admission that PJ thought she had been abducted from day 1 not the parents.
"“From our experience of criminal investigations, if this was a kidnap – which is what we believed from the start – the revealing of such a distinct feature would put that person’s life in danger.”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492085/Madeleine-campaign-life-danger.html

[Eleanor]

That is quite an admission that PJ thought she had been abducted from day 1 not the parents.
"“From our experience of criminal investigations, if this was a kidnap – which is what we believed from the start – the revealing of such a distinct feature would put that person’s life in danger.”

Mr. Anjos.  Well he got that wrong.  The PJ released a description of Madeleine's eye defect.  The PJ also released a photograph.  The rest of what he has had to say was scandalous.

[G-Unit]

More sloppiness by The PJ.

Or by Gerry or the translator. The same thing is said in Gerry's 4th May statement.

[Eleanor]

Or by Gerry or the translator. The same thing is said in Gerry's 4th May statement.

The important point is that it was The PJ who released Madeleine' description along with a photograph to The Press.  They did this on the 5th of May 2007.

And just in case, No, I do not have a problem with this.

[Robittybob1]

The important point is that it was The PJ who released Madeleine' description along with a photograph to The Press.  They did this on the 5th of May 2007.

And just in case, No, I do not have a problem with this.

I don't think you can see the eye defect in the PJ photo.

[Eleanor]

I don't think you can see the eye defect in the PJ photo.

They mention the eye defect in The Description.  Which incidentally, I have just Posted.

[Robittybob1]

They mention the eye defect in The Description.  Which incidentally, I have just Posted.

I agree it is in the worded description, but is it visible in the photo attached to that description?

[Eleanor]

I agree it is in the worded description, but is it visible in the photo attached to that description?

I have no idea.  Does it matter?  These Coloboma are not as obvious as some seem to think.

[Robittybob1]

I have no idea.  Does it matter?  These Coloboma are not as obvious as some seem to think.

It does really, for we have just had a PJ saying it was a dangerous thing to do but they seem to have done the same thing themselves.
"Carlos Anjos, chairman of the Portuguese Union of Police Detectives, said the publicity drive by Kate and Gerry McCann to find their four-year-old daughter had damaged the investigation and he called on them to stop."

"But Portuguese police, whose investigations usually operate in secret, always opposed the publicity and did not even want the child's photograph to be distributed.

Mr Anjos told Radio 4's Inside Stories programme: "We thought that the photos should not show the distinct mark Madeleine had in her eye.

"From our experience of criminal investigations, if this was a kidnap - which is what we believed from the start - the revealing of such a distinct feature would put that person's life in danger."  end quote.

[Snowgirl]

I have no idea.  Does it matter?  These Coloboma are not as obvious as some seem to think.

So why "Look into my eyes."?
Misleading the public imo ,considering  Madeleine's passport only mentioned "small mark"

[Venturi Swirl]

So why "Look into my eyes."?
Misleading the public imo ,considering  Madeleine's passport only mentioned "small mark"

Madeleine did have a distinguishing feature in her eye so why was it misleading to point it out?

[Snowgirl]

Madeleine did have a distinguishing feature in her eye so why was it misleading to point it out?

The person who filled the passport  form in put small mark as I just said , not  Coloboma .

When asked about it in later years in an interview with Piers Morgan Kate said it wasn't really noticeable .

[sadie]

The person who filled the passport  form in put small mark as I just said , not  Coloboma .

When asked about it in later years in an interview with Piers Morgan Kate said it wasn't really noticeable .

Colobomas can be very small.  The general public would understand the term 'a small mark' much better than the name 'Coloboma'

[sadie]

You might as well for SY seem to have done nothing with it.

How do you know ?

[Robittybob1]

How do you know ?

Well they have had enough time.