Poster From The Other ForumWhat efficiency? Fireing a shotgun eight times at three close range targets (less than two feet away) is not efficent. Moreover one shot skimmed past patricks head and out the window.
This is what you call using a shotgun efficiantly. Eight targets, eight shots fired and all eight targets hit.
https://streamable.com/pd90wlol
SAS/SEALS and Police marksman are all skilled and trained to engage targets that are armed and ready. ie people that will shoot back at them. It doesnt take any skill to shoot three unsuspecting and unarmed men sat in a stationary vehicle.
Making things up to circumvent the incriminating evidence is never going to achieve anything.
My ResponseSpot the difference between the posters video clip and the soc. It isn't difficult:
Video Clip From Poster On Other Forum- Immovable targets
- Unhindered line of fire
- Daylight
- Little or no anxiety
- Zero chance of immovable targets to return fire
- Not illegal
Scene of crime- Potential for targets to move
- Hindered line of fire eg car seats, headrests and other parts of car interior
- Darkness outside with the only artificial lighting being interior car lights
- Potential for at least some anxiety. Get it wrong and end up seriously injured, dead and/or serving a long custodial sentence
- Potential for targets to return fire
- Illegal
The SAS/SEAL are on operational duties within the confines of the law. The perp at SoC was operating outside the law.
Try reading the expert evidence:
"He said from the relaxed positions of the deceased three it appeared to have happened very rapidly. There was not time for special movement or something to move them from their comfortable positions".
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6020.msg510061#msg510061Absolute rubbish to think anyone other than a marksman could fire off those shots with the murdered trio not moving from their comfortable positions. There's zero evidence Steele or Whomes possessed this sort of skill.