Off Topic and General Discussions > 911 Terror Attacks - Debate the Conspiracy Theories
Just more conspiracy cranks?
Tim Invictus:
I too thought it would just be a bunch of nutters and cranks common to all major world events. I watched a few videos expecting David Icke type nutjobs who are always good for a laugh! Not only did the evidence for a 911 conspiracy become more compelling the more I read, but slowly I realised those seeking the truth are very serious people and include 1000's of highly qualified professionals from numerous backgrounds and professions.
As 341 firefighters were killed in the Twin Towers, I think most people would agree they would hardly be involved in some crank plot, would they?
http://web.archive.org/web/20110911032318/firefightersfor911truth.org/
Tim Invictus:
Architects and Engineers
2,207 + highly qualified architects and engineers have joined http://www.ae911truth.org giving their testimony that the 3 skyscrapers that collapsed on 9/11 (the only 3 such occurrences in history)must have been brought down by controlled demolitions.
The following video produced by AE911Truth is to me PROOF POSITIVE WTC 7 was brought down by a controlled explosion. If this is true then it must follow the whole of 911 was one huge and quite incredible inside job!
Please watch : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw (15 mins)
Tim Invictus:
Pilots & Aviation Professionals
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core.html
Have a look at the members list. 100's of Captains, military pilots, etc. who do not believe the official story!
Andrea:
Nah then, Tim.
Sorry if you have already answered this but..am I correct in understanding that WTC7 was not hit by a plane? But somehow it caught fire?
I will keep an open mind on the conspiracy, but yes it does look like it was brought down in a controlled demolition. Its hard to deny that really.
The 'plane' that hit the Pentagon has always bothered me, the size of the hole just doesn't tally with the size of a plane!
The plane that came down in the field, the debris didn't resemble a plane, no wing, fuselage or engines.
The Pan am flight which blew up over Lockerbie was still recognisable as a plane!
Tim Invictus:
--- Quote from: Andrea on July 03, 2014, 10:11:29 AM ---Nah then, Tim.
Sorry if you have already answered this but..am I correct in understanding that WTC7 was not hit by a plane? But somehow it caught fire?
I will keep an open mind on the conspiracy, but yes it does look like it was brought down in a controlled demolition. Its hard to deny that really.
The 'plane' that hit the Pentagon has always bothered me, the size of the hole just doesn't tally with the size of a plane!
The plane that came down in the field, the debris didn't resemble a plane, no wing, fuselage or engines.
The Pan am flight which blew up over Lockerbie was still recognisable as a plane!
--- End quote ---
Correct Andi WTC 7 was hit by no plane and had no significant damage from debris from the collapse of the Twin Towers. It was over 100 meters away and there were other buildings between it and the Towers.
Did you know the Pentagon has it's own extensive weapons systems including surface to air missiles that can shoot down the fastest jet fighters but it still got hit by an airliner! And the Pentagon is covered inside and out, every inch, by the most sophisticated CCTV systems yet still there is no film of the plane strike!
The 'plane' in the field is a joke! They 'find' a terrorists passport and bandana and yet 6 ton Rolls Royce engines disappear? Ludicrous!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version