I have read the whole report actually. It makes no mention of '150 vile tweets a day'. The newspaper in question has taken an estimate provided by the author of the report given to the paper of the number of abusive comments made about the McCanns on a daily basis across various social media platforms, not just twitter and turned it into an attention grabbing headline. It's his estimate based on the work he and his colleagues undertook over a six week period. If you wish to disbelieve the author's estimate or the work he and his colleagues did on the subject then that's entirely up to you. I've no interest in what you believe or in trying to convince you that the McCanns are the subject of a huge amount of online abuse on a daily basis. I know what I know, and I know I'm right, that is all.
If you have read the whole report you will be able to answer very simple questions about it.
Which social media did the team monitor?
What was their methodology for classifying a message as abusive?
What was the total number of social media messages per day, relating to the McCanns?
What was the total number per day classified as abusive, according to the report?
Surely in a thread about The Sun's sensational assertion, a few facts would not go astray.
Don't be shy Alfie. Get your copy out and enlighten us. Or point us at somewhere we can read it for ourselves.
The alternative is 'trust me, I'm Alfie, and I say it is thus'.