Theories and Ideas....CJ's second witness statement.... The fact that he may have seen or heard 2-3 people at the gate on the 17th December 2010, was one of the reasons that the Police had an interest in him....
But I couldn't understand why the Police may have a similar interest in Dr Vincent Tabak... Why would The Police contact him when he was away in Cambridge?? I believe DC Karen Thomas called him whilst he and Tanja were visiting her parents over Christmas...
What statements to the Police did Dr Vincent Tabak make?? I was looking at the FOI request that N. Osey made asking if she could see any statements that Dr Vincent Tabak signed, and to cut a long story short the request was denied...
Dr Vincent Tabak has said little to nothing as far as we are aware, DC Karen Thomas tells us it was when she was in Holland that Dr Vincent Tabak's over interest in forensics was the reason the alarm bells started to ring....
But that cannot be the case.... Ann Reddrop states that it was late December 2010 that the Police had gone to seek advise and I believe it is from that time forward they began to Investigate Dr Vincent Tabak....
But what had it been before, to have DC Karen Thomas needing to contact Dr Vincent Tabak whilst he was away in Cambridge? There had to be something of importance that she felt the need to contact him again... He is a neighbour just like the rest of the people who live in that house, they were not contacted so many times.... The Police do not shift from that house, so what was found in and around that house?
The Police are wanting us to believe that because of a phone call about a car changing position, they wasted money to fly out to Holland to ask Dr Vincent Tabak about this incident.... When in reality I believe they could and should have waited on his return.... There has to be more to that interview in Holland than meets the eye...
I keep going back to DCI Phil Jones and his comment he made about Dr Vincent Tabak and saying that Dr Vincent Tabak wouldn't answer questions about CJ, and would only comment on an issue surrounding a mobile phone....
That in itself is an odd comment to make..... Why would a mobile phone be of such great importance??
Did Dr Vincent Tabak find a mobile phone?? Did he find it, did he use it?? Did Joanna Yeates have a secondary phone?? a works phone maybe??
There has to be a reason why DC Karen Thomas felt the need to contact Dr Vincent Tabak on the 23rd December 2010, I think it was, to speak to him.... He has had to divulge or suggest something for them to want to keep questioning him....
Dr Vincent Tabak has used the main gate and the little gate, either exit could have had something lying on the ground...
Did he find a phone and hand it into Police? Was it the blackberry everyone keeps hinting at... Because we have not been told which type of phone anybody owns...
DC Karen Thomas needs a jolly good reason to phone him when he's in Cambridge, he's just a neighbour, who had said he didn't see anything... So what was of such great importance DC Karen Thomas is keen to keep Dr Vincent Tabak in her sights, days before the Holland interview??
Dr Vincent Tabak didn't know Joanna Yeates had never met Joanna Yeates had never seen Joanna Yeates.... He isn't a viable suspect at this point....
Clegg says that Dr Vincent Tabak lied and lied to the Police, if he made a No Comment statements as DCI Jones tells us, and only answers questions surrounding a mobile phone, then it has to be the mobile phone he is lying about... It stands to reason....
And the only reason I could think a mobile phone would be important, is that it belonged to Joanna Yeates...
There has to be something that only the Police know.... There has to be something they held back....
There was a Police Officer who apparently went around to Dr Vincent Tabak's Flat on the early hours of Monday 20th December 2010 to ask Dr Vincent Tabak and Tanja Morson if they had seen their neighbour.... It could be at this point that Dr Vincent Tabak tells them he found a phone.... Even gives them said phone.....
Now my reasoning comes from the fact that Greg Reardon didn't ring Rebecca Scott or Darragh Bellew as far as I know on the Sunday 19th December 2010... Now if there was only one of her phones in her coat pocket, maybe that didn't reveal whom she had called...
Rebecca Scott first learnt of Joanna Yeates disappearance when the Police contacted her at about 4:00am, I believe she notices a missed message... So which phone was in Joanna Yeates coat pocket?? Her work phone or her personal phone??
Greg Rings, Mr and Mrs Yeates, his mother we have been lead to believe, CJ and the Police.... What about the people she text?? What about anyone else she may have rung or anyone who may have rung her??
He would have CJ's number in his own phone, and Mr and Mrs Yeates, he could well have had Rebecca Scotts number, but if the phone in the pocket was one of two phones, then that phone might not have revealed whom she had last spoken too....
Another reason I believe she possibly had two phones, Mr and Mrs Yeates did not call Rebecca Scott either... Now they know Rebecca Scott and they know that their daughter and her are good friends... And I am more than sure they would have rung her if the phone that was left behind had details of a call made to Rebecca Scott on the evening of the 17th December 2010... Mrs Yeates had found the receipt, she tells us this on video.... which makes me positive, if she had known that the last phone call made on that evening she would have immediately called Rebecca Scott to ask her if Joanna Yeates had said anything about going anywhere....
This might also explain why the phone had battery life still left in it of it wasn't used at all... no incoming calls to speak of no messages to run the phone battery life down...
Did the Yeates ring Rebecca Scott anyway?? To ask them if they had heard anything from Joanna Yeates?? Is that why Rebecca Scott knew immediately that when the Police had tried to contact her, that something was wrong...
She phoned me on the Friday ... erm.. I travelled home for Christmas on the Sunday..(gulp).. Erm... It was about 4 O'clock in the morning I woke up. Erm.. (licks lips) And saw that there was a message, on my phone from the police... Er... Informing me that she had gone missing...
Er... Obviously they'd seen on the phone that she'd phoned me. And.. obviously wanted me to get in touch... Erm.... I immediately sort of panicked and phoned Jo...
And Greg... Greg answered the phone.... I knew something was wrong... er I think, we all did.
Erm.. (pause)(licks lips) As soon as I found out her possessions were in the flat, you know , that was it.. I knew that hadn't left the house of her own intention.
Which phone did Rebecca Scott ring?? The house phone, Joanna Yeates phone or a secondary phone of Joanna Yeates??
If the Police are contacting her to tell her that Joanna Yeates is Missing, then it has to be the phone that is of importance....
The Police are not gonna ring her and say your best friend is Missing and we know that you were the last person to speak to her, they are not going to reveal what they know to a person they may need to interview...
It is Rebecca Scott telling us that the Police had seen on Joanna Yeates phone that she had rung her... So why didn't Greg see it or Mr and Mrs Yeates??
There is always something Missing... In this case... And it has been a case of everything Missing.... You just have to look at the staged flat to realise that.....
So was Dr Vincent Tabak in possession of a mobile phone that wasn't his?? Had someone given it to him and asked him to pass it to her seeing as he lived in the same building.....
The Police don't just do an inquiry around one building unless they believe a crime has been committed... And they were very slow to gather evidence of any significance.... Took them over a week to retrieve the footage from The Hop House Pub....
One more thing... There was more in CJ's second witness statement other than who he may have seen/heard at the gate.... That was only part of it.... Did Dr Vincent Tabak tell CJ about this mobile phone business that DCI Phil Jones speaks of??? Just like CJ had told the neighbours about seeing someone at the gate?? Now if the mobile phone is the crux of the case, because it appears to be of too great an importance, then is this the reason that CJ didn't take the stand!!!
We have all been busy, chasing CJ's second witness statement.... And I believe that Leonora is CORRECT.... !!!!
It is the most vital piece of evidence that we need to see at present... The contents must be mind blowing for it not to have been used at trial....!!(imo)