Here's another question.... if you chuck the word paedophile at someone, and they are into S&M, then legally have you libelled them?? seeing as Category (A) covers more than one subject??
Does that mean someone could 'say or link' someone to being a paedophile, simply by using an ambiguous law and legally could be seen as accurate...
Therefore, Man Z likes S&M, but someone dislikes MAN Z ( I'll call him man Y)and wants to cause him an issue, so tweets or connects this man to a known Padeophile, and everyone therefore believes that MAN Z is a Paedophile.. Man Y could confidently state that Man Z comes under category (A)...
and everyone knows what that means... So would assume it was true and accurate...
But as I have found out today, that is not the case....
So Man Y, knows the law and theoretically Man Z would come under category (A), so has man Y committed a crime? As it is an interpretation of the law he/she may have used...
Once called a paedophile, it sticks, no matter whom you are...
And everyone is always happy to look for the worst in anyone... And point the finger...