Author Topic: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.  (Read 18120 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sadie

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #45 on: October 29, 2018, 07:26:21 PM »
I suspect the fact that blood was found was enough.  Although we can't even be sure of that.

Enough for Amaral and Cristovao, but it shoukldn't have been enough for any self respecting Court.  Why didn't Leonors lawyer, Joao Grade question that ?  Why didn't he demand that the blood be properly tested ?  It could even have been none human, such as pigs blood.

Why didn't Grade question that Leonor and Joao Cipriano had killed Joana based upon Amarals assertion that she had come across them having sex together.  Nobody saw it.......  No proof of that.

Why didn't Grade question Amarals assertion that Joana had been cut up and fed to the pigs.   Nobody saw it.......  No proof of that.

Why didn't Grade make more fuss about the Torturing of Leonor?

Why didn't Grade challenge ?  ........................  I could go on


In fact, why was Joao Grade allowed in that Court after being found carrying drugs into prison ?  Amaral was, of course, the head druugs cop in the Algarve region.  Was he the one who let Grade off being charged fior that?

And Joao Grade and Amaral were buddies.  Grade attended Amarals ?50th birthday bash and according to the media offered to train Amaral as a Lawyer.



Now was that a  "CONFLICT OF INTERESTS " or not ?

I make absolutely no accusations, but think people should be aware of these things to weigh it up in their own minds

No wonder that one of the three judges refused to acknowledge the verdict.

Offline misty

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #46 on: October 29, 2018, 07:29:23 PM »
A bit slow on the uptake there imo.
53 weeks plus to catch on is hardly the speed of greased lightning is it?
Perhaps no-one in Portugal was interested in a case which had already been "solved"? There have been many reports of witnesses in the McCann case whose evidence was ignored by both the PJ & the Portuguese media as is was contrary to the narrative at the time.
All IMO.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #47 on: October 29, 2018, 08:49:49 PM »
because I read the trial details when they were available....because it was discussed at length...there was no real evidence....it was claimed there was blood on the walls and the fridge...none was tested.....yet the proven facts stated joannas blood was found in the fridge.....the portuguese seem to think proven facts dont actually have to be proven

Which has already been stated, by another poster, was only what was printed in the tabloids and interpollations thereof.
Did you obtain the actual trial transcripts and have them translated?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #48 on: October 29, 2018, 09:04:39 PM »
Which has already been stated, by another poster, was only what was printed in the tabloids and interpollations thereof.
Did you obtain the actual trial transcripts and have them translated?
Then the other poster is wrong....

https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/07/supreme-court-of-justice-joana-case.html?m=1


http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2969.0
« Last Edit: October 29, 2018, 09:17:28 PM by Davel »

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #49 on: October 29, 2018, 09:14:26 PM »
Then the other poster is wrong....

Why did you not correct her at the time?
So I take it you did not have the court transcripts translated and are working from Portuguese tabloid reports you translated into Googlish.

« Last Edit: October 30, 2018, 02:32:07 PM by John »
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #50 on: October 29, 2018, 10:03:20 PM »
You have a Cite for this letter?

Your friend Marcos Aragão Correia drafted and delivered her letter clarifying what occurred.

https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/01/translation-of-leonor-ciprianos.html?m=1

« Last Edit: October 29, 2018, 10:23:27 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #51 on: October 29, 2018, 11:00:54 PM »
I never heard of this letter.

Could we have a cite please Angelo

I seriously suggest you read up on that case again Sadie because this is basic stuff.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline misty

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #52 on: October 30, 2018, 12:05:46 AM »
Your friend Marcos Aragão Correia drafted and delivered her letter clarifying what occurred.

https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/01/translation-of-leonor-ciprianos.html?m=1



What purpose do you think that alternative "confession" served during the trial of the PJ Inspectors?

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #53 on: October 30, 2018, 12:40:05 AM »
What purpose do you think that alternative "confession" served during the trial of the PJ Inspectors?

Leonor Cipriano was appealing her conviction so was trying to come clean as to what really happened.  The judges didn't buy it though.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline misty

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #54 on: October 30, 2018, 12:50:59 AM »
Leonor Cipriano was appealing her conviction so was trying to come clean as to what really happened.  The judges didn't buy it though.

I'm not quite understanding you. The new "confession" was delivered to the Faro court during the trial of the PJ Inspectors. How could it have affected any appeal she was making?

Online Eleanor

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #55 on: October 30, 2018, 07:40:34 AM »
Your friend Marcos Aragão Correia drafted and delivered her letter clarifying what occurred.

https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/01/translation-of-leonor-ciprianos.html?m=1



This letter is not signed.  How does it make Leonor a murderer?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #56 on: October 30, 2018, 08:02:13 AM »
So you don’t accept the ruling of the Portuguese court then?  Interesting...
« Last Edit: October 30, 2018, 09:32:01 AM by Angelo222 »
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Online Eleanor

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #57 on: October 30, 2018, 08:06:15 AM »
So you don’t accept the ruling of the Portuguese court then?  Interesting...

One of The Judges didn't either.

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #58 on: October 30, 2018, 09:28:41 AM »
This letter is not signed.  How does it make Leonor a murderer?

She claimed latterly in that letter to have been an accomplice after the event.

« Last Edit: October 30, 2018, 09:32:46 AM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Online Eleanor

Re: The Joana Cipriano case revisited.
« Reply #59 on: October 30, 2018, 09:35:03 AM »
She claimed latterly in that letter to have been an accomplice after the event.

So was Joana to be sold?  Did Leonor agree to her being killed at the time?  How did she become an accomplice after the event?