Author Topic: Former Portuguese detective Gonçalo Amaral wins appeal in damages trial.  (Read 533503 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

I suppose there is a difference between being able to hear an appeal and choosing to hear one.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

stephen25000

  • Guest
And Madeleine McCann is once again prominently in public focus.

No trace of her.

Not one solitary clue.

Offline carlymichelle

I suppose there is a difference between being able to hear an appeal and choosing to hear one.

the supreme court  doesnt have to accept their appeal do they??

stephen25000

  • Guest
the supreme court  doesnt have to accept their appeal do they??

Monclair or Shining would have some idea on that.

Or perhaps ferryman can Google again. 8)--))

Offline carlymichelle

Monclair or Shining would have some idea on that.

Or perhaps ferryman can Google again. 8)--))

hey google is a  friend to   all   ?{)(**

Offline misty

No trace of her.

Not one solitary clue.

Your negativity is only exceeded by your desire to share it.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2016, 11:54:22 PM by misty »

ferryman

  • Guest
Monclair or Shining would have some idea on that.

Or perhaps ferryman can Google again. 8)--))

Google (has) provided the definitive answer on this one.

stephen25000

  • Guest
You negativity is only exceeded by your desire to share it.

What part of no trace of Madeleine do you not get ?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Google (has) provided the definitive answer on this one.

Come on, I can hardly wait. 6&%5%

Offline jassi

Google (has) provided the definitive answer on this one.

Not really . It says that the Supreme Court can hear civil cases, not that it invariably will hear them.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline misty

Re: Former Portuguese detective Gonçalo Amaral wins appeal in damages trial.
« Reply #1000 on: April 21, 2016, 09:22:55 PM »
Here's another link to the role of the Supreme Court. Perhaps one of Isa's friends could post it to her.
http://www.lexadin.nl/wlg/courts/nofr/eur/lxctpor.htm

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Former Portuguese detective Gonçalo Amaral wins appeal in damages trial.
« Reply #1001 on: April 21, 2016, 09:23:42 PM »
Not really . It says that the Supreme Court can hear civil cases, not that it invariably will hear them.

Oh dear ....

Offline misty

Re: Former Portuguese detective Gonçalo Amaral wins appeal in damages trial.
« Reply #1002 on: April 21, 2016, 09:26:03 PM »
Could you try that in legible English ?

It's supporterspeak. You'd never understand it.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Former Portuguese detective Gonçalo Amaral wins appeal in damages trial.
« Reply #1003 on: April 21, 2016, 09:27:21 PM »
It's supporterspeak. You'd never understand it.

No it's mccann supporter double Dutch.

As clear as your ability to solve equations.

Offline misty

Re: Former Portuguese detective Gonçalo Amaral wins appeal in damages trial.
« Reply #1004 on: April 21, 2016, 09:31:01 PM »
No it's mccann supporter double Dutch.

As clear as your ability to solve equations.

I understood what Ferryman posted but perhaps I am considerably cleverer that wot you fink.