The disappearance of Joana Cipriano and why was she not reported missing sooner?

[Angelo222]

I do think Antonio Colaço knows what he is talking about regardless of what the later court saw fit to accept.

[faithlilly]

I do think Antonio Colaço knows what he is talking about regardless of what the later court saw fit to accept.

In regard to what ?

[Angelo222]

So who faked the photos  ?

Who do you think?  The same guy who abused his authority as a lawyer to extract a confession from Joanas uncle.

It is very obvious that the photos were enhanced to make the injuries look much worse than they originally were.

[sadie]

It's great to be back again and to see we are all in such good spirits at last.  I think some members should have a look at the following video.   You don't even need to understand Portuguese. 

So easy to do that Angelo.  Get rid of bruises on the real image and produce flawless skin on the faked image

My hubby can do that in a flash.   Think he uses Micrographax or something like that.

Another con trick Angelo.  They have tricked you.


The Prison Governor saw them and testified to them
The Doctor saw them and testified to them
The photographer saw them and probably testified... cant be botherd to check that ... cos it is a con

The Courts saw them and accepted them

Twice




Wonder if they will take Amaral to Court again for falsifying evidence?  ... and wasting Court time.

Maybe it wasn't him, but I wonder ... really I do


Only my thoughts, of course.  Could be any of them.

[Redblossom]

Redblossom
libel



Why was it only when she got marcos the mad one as her lawyer and why? The one who was recruited by the the mccanns to dig the dirt on mr amaral? He is quoted  as saying target hit?

abuse



But nothing new

No poiint in reporting it .  Nothing happens.

Perhaps i will.  And maybe some other people should know if you keep on in this vein, Red

Leonoras mother put her into prostitution in its the. Court document, no wonder she left home sadie at 11 no libel just fact of a dysfunctional upbringing, she is unfortunately a damged individual and not the saint and perfect mother YOU wish her to be, after all, she abandoned most of her kids, silly

Oh btw carana, havent got time to hunt the right thread, bit joanoa was back home that night because her shoes that she was wearing were found there, catch up tomorrow, btw sadie you  are right  marcos is very guilty and more of abuse at best

[sadie]

Leonoras mother put her into prostitution in its the. Court document, no wonder she left home sadie at 11 no libel just fact of a dysfunctional upbringing, she is unfortunately a damged individual and not the saint and perfect mother YOU wish her to be, after all, she abandoned most of her kids, silly

I was not aware of that Red; thet her mother put her into prostitution.  Please can you supply a cite?

Sorry, I see thta it was in THAT Court Document.  The one based upon NO EVIDENCE except the words Of Amaral, and he is a convicted perjurer.

NO EVIDENCE.  The Court Documents are a nonsense

[Redblossom]

I was not aware of that Red; thet her mother put her into prostitution.  Please can you supply a cite?

The cites  have been provided in both languages go read them

[sadie]

See above.

[DCI]

Who do you think?  The same guy who abused his authority as a lawyer to extract a confession from Joanas uncle.

It is very obvious that the photos were enhanced to make the injuries look much worse than they originally were.

And when were the photo's first taken, Angelo?

[sadie]

The Court report depended upon TORTURED OUT EVIDENCE or on ?Amarals word.

Amarals word, or that of his associates, of whom he is the superior.

He was the head honcho in this case, so he carries the buck.



TORTURED OUT EVIDENCE is NOT EVIDENCE, so the case is unsafe. 

Likewise the Official Court Documents which were saying things like the body was cut up in a precise manner and describing that exact manner in detail.  Stuff that nobody witnessed and of which there was NO FORENSIC or other evidence.

So how did the Courts know this?


Please tell me.

[Angelo222]

And when were the photo's first taken, Angelo?

As you well know DCI the photos were ordered by the prison boss who was concerned for her own functionaries.

[sadie]

As you well know DCI the photos were ordered by the prison boss who was concerned for her own functionaries.

So you are saying that DR Ana was telling lies are you Angello?

[Redblossom]

Quote from: DCI on Today at 09:33:52 PM
And when were the photo's first taken, Angelo?

As you well know DCI the photos were ordered by the prison boss who was concerned for her own functionaries.
 

Exactly

[Angelo222]

So easy to do that Angelo.  Get rid of bruises on the real image and produce flawless skin on the faked image

My hubby can do that in a flash.   Think he uses Micrographic or something like that.

Another con trick Angelo.  They have tricked you.


The Prison Governor saw them and testified to them
The Doctor saw them and testified to them
The photographer saw them and probably testified... cant be botherd to check that ... cos it is a con

The Courts saw them and accepted them

Twice




Wonder if they will take Amaral to Court again for falsifying evidence?  ... and wasting Court time.

Maybe it wasn't him, but I wonder ... really I do


Only my thoughts, of course.  Could be any of them.

It is impossible to reverse edit photos which show injuries as in the Capriano fakes which indicates that you don't understand software capabilities and limitations.  The advocado was holding an original photo of Leonor showing black eyes only which was the real extent of her bruising.  Had he attempted to con the Court he would have been in contempt.  No advocado is going to do this or to show the press the photos if there was a chance that he would be held in contempt of court.   Leonora was found guilty, she has had her appeal refused.  The supreme court has not been persuaded of her innocence in the murder of Joana so until that changes she is guilty.

Leonor had injuries certainly but they were not as shown by a defence lawyer who has himself faced censure and claims that he has mental health issues.

[Benice]

So you are saying that DR Ana was telling lies are you Angello?

If the injuries were so slight, one wonders why the Govenor called in a doctor, and then one wonders why it was thought necessary to take photographs of such minor injuries?     I think both were absolutely appalled at the state Leonor was in.  Comments were also made that her condition worsened after a month or so because of the amount of blood which had collected behind her eyes due to the severity of the beatings.     No doubt there will be doctor's reports on this - (other than the one which said that the injuries were not conducive with a fall downstairs) , which may not have been made public.