All the lies the Media have told about Christian Bruckner

[Mr Gray]

I've never claimed to know what happened to Madeleine McCann.

I was referring to the possibility of Breukner being charged

[Brietta]

If the German version of the crime is correct Madeleine wouldn't have returned safely home.

If the rape cases had been handled properly by the Portuguese the eventually convicted perpetrator of one crime at least should have been under lock and key.
The crime for which Brueckner was convicted took place in Praia da Luz in 2005 and the evidence was there to be used to secure a conviction and take a dangerous man off the streets, it seems the Portuguese police didn't bother.
 
Brueckner is the prime suspect in the rape of a young woman the previous year.  He is the prime suspect in Madeleine's disappearance.
Justice is still to be done in both of these cases.

If the current poster boy for apologists of what appears to have been a major crime wave in the Algarve during the short time Madeleine was there, had paid for his violent crime of 2005 there might have been no ping from his phone registered on a mast in Luz in 2007.
Therefore with one piece of the current jigsaw displaced would he ever have been brought to the attention of investigators to assume his unique position as chief suspect.

The conundrum is were Brueckner to have been where he belonged in 2007 would Madeleine have enjoyed her holiday and returned safely from it.

I think your post evidences that you are looking from entirely the wrong perspective.

[kizzy]

If the rape cases had been handled properly by the Portuguese the eventually convicted perpetrator of one crime at least should have been under lock and key.
The crime for which Brueckner was convicted took place in Praia da Luz in 2005 and the evidence was there to be used to secure a conviction and take a dangerous man off the streets, it seems the Portuguese police didn't bother.
 
Brueckner is the prime suspect in the rape of a young woman the previous year.  He is the prime suspect in Madeleine's disappearance.
Justice is still to be done in both of these cases.

If the current poster boy for apologists of what appears to have been a major crime wave in the Algarve during the short time Madeleine was there, had paid for his violent crime of 2005 there might have been no ping from his phone registered on a mast in Luz in 2007.
Therefore with one piece of the current jigsaw displaced would he ever have been brought to the attention of investigators to assume his unique position as chief suspect.

The conundrum is were Brueckner to have been where he belonged in 2007 would Madeleine have enjoyed her holiday and returned safely from it.

I think your post evidences that you are looking from entirely the wrong perspective.

The conundrum is were Brueckner to have been where he belonged in 2007 would Madeleine have enjoyed her holiday and returned safely from it.

So a couple of times you have now mentioned if this ..if that if the other. the main conundrum though is.

If Maddie had had the protection she had a right to as their child ....she would have defiantly returned home safely from it.

[Brietta]

The conundrum is were Brueckner to have been where he belonged in 2007 would Madeleine have enjoyed her holiday and returned safely from it.

So a couple of times you have now mentioned if this ..if that if the other. the main conundrum though is.

If Maddie had had the protection she had a right to as their child ....she would have defiantly returned home safely from it.

That doesn't necessarily follow.  There are holiday tragedies every year ensuring that somebody's well protected child does not return from holiday.

But in my opinion the state which allows a rapist and paedophile to walk amongst it's people and those they have invited to their country is one which should be seriously questioned.

If Brueckner had been traced and prosecuted as he should have been in 2005 a very dangerous criminal should have been where he could harm no-one or even be suspected of further criminal activity during that time.

But most of all by delivering justice the State would have been adopting its duty of care.  But it seems no-one bothered about justice until the Germans did.

[G-Unit]

The conundrum is were Brueckner to have been where he belonged in 2007 would Madeleine have enjoyed her holiday and returned safely from it.

So a couple of times you have now mentioned if this ..if that if the other. the main conundrum though is.

If Maddie had had the protection she had a right to as their child ....she would have defiantly returned home safely from it.

You're quite right, of course. If Madeleine was abducted and murdered her parents played a part by leaving her vulnerable.

[Venturi Swirl]

You're quite right, of course. If Madeleine was abducted and murdered her parents played a part by leaving her vulnerable.

The sceptic fall back position for when they are proven wrong - it was STILL the parents wot dunnit through their "neglect".  Poor child abductor who couldn't help himself was virtually invited in and asked to remove the child because of the evil parents' actions.

[Eleanor]

It appears that point has also escaped the three people who liked Brietta’s comment.

Who Liked Brietta's Comment is entirely irrelevant.  We all have a right to Comment.  Likes are none of your business.

[Eleanor]

If the rape cases had been handled properly by the Portuguese the eventually convicted perpetrator of one crime at least should have been under lock and key.
The crime for which Brueckner was convicted took place in Praia da Luz in 2005 and the evidence was there to be used to secure a conviction and take a dangerous man off the streets, it seems the Portuguese police didn't bother.
 
Brueckner is the prime suspect in the rape of a young woman the previous year.  He is the prime suspect in Madeleine's disappearance.
Justice is still to be done in both of these cases.

If the current poster boy for apologists of what appears to have been a major crime wave in the Algarve during the short time Madeleine was there, had paid for his violent crime of 2005 there might have been no ping from his phone registered on a mast in Luz in 2007.
Therefore with one piece of the current jigsaw displaced would he ever have been brought to the attention of investigators to assume his unique position as chief suspect.

The conundrum is were Brueckner to have been where he belonged in 2007 would Madeleine have enjoyed her holiday and returned safely from it.

I think your post evidences that you are looking from entirely the wrong perspective.

This all such a waste of time in so far as this Forum is concerned.  One rule for some and another rule  for others.

I don't really care anymore, much as I want for Madeleine to be alive.  The nastiness defeats me.

But if The Sceptics want Madeleine to be dead by the hand of her own parents, which they obviously do, then something isn't quite right in the heads of these people.

[faithlilly]

Who Liked Brietta's Comment is entirely irrelevant.  We all have a right to Comment.  Likes are none of your business.

Apologies but I was just surprised that so many people had missed that very pertinent point.

[faithlilly]

That doesn't necessarily follow.  There are holiday tragedies every year ensuring that somebody's well protected child does not return from holiday.

But in my opinion the state which allows a rapist and paedophile to walk amongst it's people and those they have invited to their country is one which should be seriously questioned.

If Brueckner had been traced and prosecuted as he should have been in 2005 a very dangerous criminal should have been where he could harm no-one or even be suspected of further criminal activity during that time.

But most of all by delivering justice the State would have been adopting its duty of care.  But it seems no-one bothered about justice until the Germans did.

Do you remember the post I posted about the hundreds of paedophiles that the British police have lost track of because they have changed their names by deed poll ?

[faithlilly]

This all such a waste of time in so far as this Forum is concerned.  One rule for some and another rule  for others.

I don't really care anymore, much as I want for Madeleine to be alive.  The nastiness defeats me.

But if The Sceptics want Madeleine to be dead by the hand of her own parents, which they obviously do, then something isn't quite right in the heads of these people.

Likewise I fail to understand the tenacity with which supporters desperately try to prove that Madeleine was murdered by a vicious sex fiend. Now that really is shocking.

[Eleanor]

Apologies but I was just surprised that so many people had missed that very pertinent point.

What point?  There were no comments.

I should take that up with John if I were you.  Somedebody Liked A Comment.  What next?

[faithlilly]

What point?  There were no comments.

I should take that up with John if I were you.  Somedebody Liked A Comment.  What next?

Why would I take it up with John ?  It’s you who seems to have the problem.

Now I’ve apologised so shall we just move on ?

[Mr Gray]

Likewise I fail to understand the tenacity with which supporters desperately try to prove that Madeleine was murdered by a vicious sex fiend. Now that really is shocking.

HCW is the one collecting evidence to prove the case...not posters here

[Eleanor]

Why would I take it up with John ?  It’s you who seems to have the problem.

Now I’ve apologised so shall we just move on ?

Gosh, was that an apology?

I don't need to move on to anywhere.  I know exactly where I am.

However, it does interest me for the fact that you always pick up on my comments.  Is this a kindness on your part?  I tend to think that it is.