As did a group of supporters who collated a dossier of 'evidence' which was handed to the UK police. They thought it was going to lead to prosecutions, but it didn't.
It didn't and in my opinion that is because of failure in the law ... but not to worry ... it may have been slow to take off but the serious nature of on line abuse is at last being recognised in England and Wales. In my opinion a situation which is long overdue.
SnipOnline hate crimes should be treated as seriously as abuse committed face-to-face, prosecutors in England and Wales have been told.
Revising its guidance for prosecutors, the Crown Prosecution Service said the impact of tweeting abuse can be as "equally devastating" as shouting it.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40981235However at risk of veering back On Topic ... one really has to wonder at the collective mentality of this group as they have, in my opinion, seethed away at the outrage that Madeleine McCann's parents pulled off the impossible and got a meaningful professional investigation going into Madeleine's disappearance both here (Scotland Yard) and in Portugal (Policia Judiciaria).
Why on earth have they taken it upon themselves to present this drivel to the Portuguese Attorney General at this late stage in proceedings?
With reference to the content of the opening post ... which apparently has been consigned to its rightful dustbin somewhere ... what can one say?
Has it passed them by that Madeleine's case has been in the process of being re-investigated since it was reopened in 2013 and hopefully funding will be approved to take it to its conclusion.
What motivates such malice towards a child for which this group pretends to demand justice while interfering assiduously in every vehicle capable of providing that justice ... makes me wonder if they think the Portuguese OG is actually going to read a twenty page catalogue of delusion before consigning it to the Paiva file. Or is it just another of their meaningful but meaningless gestures.