Author Topic: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk  (Read 66167 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #375 on: March 20, 2018, 11:49:59 PM »

What abject nonsense.

You do love the use of hyperbole.

"Falling down in worship"
"To hell with their victims""
"Victim worship"
"Set upon be protective cheetahs in a zoo"

Lol.


Hyperbole.  &%%6 I am very impressed you are hanging onto my every word. I must be interestingly annoying to you in some way.  It is very effective. I use that  a lot.

I have absolutely nothing to say about you writing about me. yawn bed time.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #376 on: March 21, 2018, 06:25:19 AM »
If you do not believe the mccanns are truthful then you are, a sceptic
A label.

In this case intended to discriminate.

Hence odious.
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #377 on: March 21, 2018, 07:43:43 AM »
A label.

In this case intended to discriminate.

Hence odious.
If you remember  it was you who introduced the, label ...supporter... In your post
I don't see any discrimination...

Edit : personal comment removed
I will change it then

You see discrimination... Therefore... Odious
« Last Edit: March 21, 2018, 08:04:43 AM by Davel »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #378 on: March 21, 2018, 08:07:53 AM »
Could we have some clarification  on the rules rob

You refer to me as... Clearly confused...
But don't accept me referring  to a poster as misguided

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #379 on: March 21, 2018, 08:14:24 AM »
It is my opinion  that sil is misguided on quite a few things...am I not allowed to day that

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #380 on: March 21, 2018, 08:17:31 AM »
Why would anyone who is sceptical of the abduction theory be upset to be classed as a sceptic?  I though many self-identified as sceptics anyway...?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #381 on: March 21, 2018, 08:20:53 AM »
Why would anyone who is sceptical of the abduction theory be upset to be classed as a sceptic?  I though many self-identified as sceptics anyway...?

That is why I find sils post misguided

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #382 on: March 21, 2018, 08:38:35 AM »
Why would anyone who is sceptical of the abduction theory be upset to be classed as a sceptic?  I though many self-identified as sceptics anyway...?

It depends whether you are creating strawman arguments.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #383 on: March 21, 2018, 06:08:39 PM »
It depends whether you are creating strawman arguments.
that does't explain it IMO.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Eleanor

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #384 on: March 21, 2018, 06:47:33 PM »
that does't explain it IMO.

Slartibartfast never does.  You are on a wing and a prayer on this one.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #385 on: March 21, 2018, 10:50:20 PM »
Slartibartfast never does.  You are on a wing and a prayer on this one.

It isn’t difficult, identify a group (baddies) with nasty characters, create arguments about why those nasty characters are wrong (and nasty) and hence the Group (baddies), suggest that some reasonable and sensible people are part of the Group (baddies) and hey presto those people are nasty...

Not rocket science.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #386 on: March 21, 2018, 10:58:14 PM »
It isn’t difficult, identify a group (baddies) with nasty characters, create arguments about why those nasty characters are wrong (and nasty) and hence the Group (baddies), suggest that some reasonable and sensible people are part of the Group (baddies) and hey presto those people are nasty...

Not rocket science.
Are sceptics baddies then?  I thought that was the politically correct term, as used by the "baddies" themselves?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #387 on: March 21, 2018, 11:00:25 PM »
Are sceptics baddies then?  I thought that was the politically correct term, as used by the "baddies" themselves?

Doesn’t matter, to the obsessives on each side the others are baddies.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2018, 07:47:24 AM by slartibartfast »
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #388 on: March 21, 2018, 11:14:09 PM »
Doesn’t matter, to the obsessive son each side the others are baddies.
So, are we allowed to refer to sceptics and supporters or not?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Brietta

Re: Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk
« Reply #389 on: March 21, 2018, 11:29:06 PM »
So, are we allowed to refer to sceptics and supporters or not?

There was discussion on the forum some time ago ... sorry I can't find the thread ... the result of which was a consensus to use the terminologies of "sceptic" and "supporter" in lieu of more offensive sobriquets.
I've always found the labelling puerile ... but there it is :)
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....