Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk

[Venturi Swirl]

Those are facts to be discovered, what someone is feeling or thinking isn’t.

Yes, some people think that where someone was going and carrying what are facts, yet they haven't really got a clue.

[Venturi Swirl]

Only they know that.

and yet you wouldn't question it if it were Kerry or Denise telling you how they feel, I don't suppose?

[Mr Gray]

They may think they know.

And you may think they don't... You seem to want absilutevpriif which is plainly ridiculous... The mccanns have to prove themselves innocent... Which is impossible
Even if a culpritvwas found and found guilty some.... Perhaps you... Would still suspect the mccanns

[slartibartfast]

And you may think they don't... You seem to want absilutevpriif which is plainly ridiculous... The mccanns have to prove themselves innocent... Which is impossible
Even if a culpritvwas found and found guilty some.... Perhaps you... Would still suspect the mccanns

You appear to be struggling with the fact that at the present time we have no way of knowing for certain how someone feels or what they are thinking.

[Mr Gray]

You appear to be struggling with the fact that at the present time we have no way of knowing for certain how someone feels or what they are thinking.

I we every way of knowing....

[G-Unit]

I we every way of knowing....

How do you know? Can you explain?

[faithlilly]

I we every way of knowing....

On one hand you say we have no idea how someone would react to a situation like the disappearance of their daughter, on the other that we have every way of knowing. Could you please make your mind up ?

[Carana]

"Said one of the group’s members: “We can only hope the authorities take notice. If our findings get published in the Portuguese media, the authorities might be obliged to make an official statement and it might get reported in the UK.

In a vague attempt to get back OnT, any idea of how the latest self-styled investigative initiative may have "prompt [ed] judicial authorities towards a reinvestigation" (of their current investigation) as a result of their "shocking" "conclusion"?

Come to think of it, has anyone noted extensive coverage in the PT media go, aside from Natasha Donn's hastily redacted press release report?

[Venturi Swirl]

"Said one of the group’s members: “We can only hope the authorities take notice. If our findings get published in the Portuguese media, the authorities might be obliged to make an official statement and it might get reported in the UK.

In a vague attempt to get back OnT, any idea of how the latest self-styled investigative initiative may have "prompt [ed] judicial authorities towards a reinvestigation" (of their current investigation) as a result of their "shocking" "conclusion"?

Come to think of it, has anyone noted extensive coverage in the PT media go, aside from Natasha Donn's hastily redacted press release report?

I may be wrong, but I have a feeling that this group's efforts are likely to sink without trace, like all their other attempts at attracting the attention of the authorities to their cause.

[Carana]

I may be wrong, but I have a feeling that this group's efforts are likely to sink without trace, like all their other attempts at attracting the attention of the authorities to their cause.

I'm intrigued as to why Natasha's original "article" was pulled prior to redaction.

Who disapproved? Someone from the "research group"? An editor? Amaral? Someone else?

[Venturi Swirl]

I'm intrigued as to why Natasha's original "article" was pulled prior to redaction.

Who disapproved? Someone from the "research group"? An editor? Amaral? Someone else?

I thought the article reappeared with the offending libel about the Last Photo removed?

[byron]

Apparently this was her reply to someone on twitter.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYMagXvWsAEe9RZ?format=jpg

[jassi]

Something to look forward to 

[Carana]

Apparently this was her reply to someone on twitter.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYMagXvWsAEe9RZ?format=jpg

Hmmm. Tabloid hacks don't normally cede their right to scoops out of deference, do they?

A redacted version did eventually reappear, and I haven't come across a mega scoop by a "much bigger paper" with a "much more comprehensive article"...

I wonder what could possibly have gone wrong?

[Venturi Swirl]

Apparently this was her reply to someone on twitter.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYMagXvWsAEe9RZ?format=jpg

That was days ago wasn't it, and she reposted the article with the libellous inference removed.  I think it's fairly safe to say that the "big" paper had second thoughts...