Latest theory lands on Portuguese AG's desk

[G-Unit]

A thought.. Amaral has not been paid and has gone very quiet..... Article 8 guarantees, the right to a privarltw life and is one of the few articles that the ECHR can impose an interim judgement...
Could it be argued that the SC ruling has denied Maddie the right to be considered alive... The right to life.. A breach of article 8

Just a thought

No, it couldn't be argued that the SC ruling has denied Madeleine anything. Unless, of course, you can provide evidence for our consideration?

[Mr Gray]

No, it couldn't be argued that the SC ruling has denied Madeleine anything. Unless, of course, you can provide evidence for our consideration?

It could be argued that the SC in supporting amarals right to say he can prove maddie is dead is denying her the right to be considered alive

[barrier]

A thought.. Amaral has not been paid and has gone very quiet..... Article 8 guarantees, the right to a privarltw life and is one of the few articles that the ECHR can impose an interim judgement...
Could it be argued that the SC ruling has denied Maddie the right to be considered alive... The right to life.. A breach of article 8

Just a thought

Or it could be just as simple that the wheels of justice work so slow in Portugal Amaral is in a queue and will be dealt with when its his turn.

[barrier]

It could be argued that the SC in supporting amarals right to say he can prove maddie is dead is denying her the right to be considered alive

Scotland Yard don't/ can't confirm her to be dead or alive what sort of situation is that? is that denying her that same right.

[Mr Gray]

Scotland Yard don't/ can't confirm her to be dead or alive what sort of situation is that? is that denying her that same right.

SC have stated clearly there is no evidence of death. Amaral claims he has proof of her death

[barrier]

SC have stated clearly there is no evidence of death. Amaral claims he has proof of her death

Pardon?
Mark Rowley:

We don't have evidence telling us if Madeleine is alive or dead. It is a missing person’s inquiry but as a team we are realistic about what we might be dealing with - especially as months turn to years.

[Mr Gray]

Pardon?
Mark Rowley:

Read it again... No evidence of alive or DEATH... yet amaral claims he can prove death

[barrier]

Didn't they send their 'research' to the Brits in the first instance?

Did they? not a lot to chose between forums then with a member here doing the same I'm led to believe.

[barrier]

Read it again... No evidence of alive or DEATH... yet amaral claims he can prove death

SY can't confirm if she is alive do they therefore deny her the same right that you protest Amaral's book didn't,did he actually say in his book this? if so relevant passage if you please.

[slartibartfast]

No, it couldn't be argued that the SC ruling has denied Madeleine anything. Unless, of course, you can provide evidence for our consideration?

It’s a Stan->Loretta right.

[Mr Gray]

SY can't confirm if she is alive do they therefore deny her the same right that you protest Amaral's book didn't,did he actually say in his book this? if so relevant passage if you please.

Amaral claims in his documentary he can prove maddie died in the, apartment

[Wonderfulspam]

Amaral claims in his documentary he can prove maddie died in the, apartment

The McCanns claim in their documentary that Maddie was abducted..... I haven't seen any proof of that.

That makes them even, imo

[barrier]

It’s a Stan->Loretta right.

Why do you want to be Loretta Stan?

[Wonderfulspam]

Why do you want to be Loretta Stan?

Are you the Judean peoples front?

[G-Unit]

It could be argued that the SC in supporting amarals right to say he can prove maddie is dead is denying her the right to be considered alive

The SC judgement supported Amaral's right to freedom of speech. It didn't say it agreed with what he said.