I hope you read this, Rob...it explains in fine detail how Sheila couldn’t have shot herself, and also explains the reasons why JB’s CT carrying out a reconstruction on dead pigs was totally pointless
If the blood was put there after the event so what if the blood matches Sheila's DNA profile? The presence of Sheila's DNA does not prove when it was put there.
"It seems to be the case that Bamber's lawyers are attempting to prove that Sheila was shot with a rifle which did not have a sound moderator or silencer fitted. You see, it was the prosecution contention at trial that Sheila was shot with a rifle which had a sound moderator fitted thus why particles of her blood found their way into the moderators baffles. It has subsequently been established by DNA testing that some of Sheila's blood did end up in the sound moderator." If it could be proved the silencer was never on well I think that would be significant.
What is the proof it was used? Is it just that blood has been found in it? Blood that could be put there after the event.
Whose body had gunshot residue consistent with a silencer in use, (the wider pattern)?