Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.

[The General]

Perhaps that's why.

I agree. The deletion is of no concern; we're not deliberating quantum mechanics here. The manner of deletion is. It's surreptitious by its very nature, as you have pointed out - you are 'not obliged' to inform.

Anyway, I'm off back to nibbling at the periphery.

[Brietta]

There is nothing sneaky about deletions of comments that break Forum Rules.

Moderators are not obliged to inform anyone of this.

Quite often a perfectly reasonable post is unfortunately deleted if it is in response to a post which itself later gets deleted. 

[Carana]

Marshall wasn't reading a translated document, but you are. (That's your cue to cast aspersions on the translators byw)

LOL

Ok about deposition, but not about "the husband". And, yes, I checked the PT original, which is itself a translation of his reply, but there's no way of knowing what on earth he was given to comment on.

[G-Unit]

LOL

Ok about deposition, but not about "the husband". And, yes, I checked the PT original, which is itself a translation of his reply, but there's no way of knowing what on earth he was given to comment on.

He was commenting on DP's answers to the questionnaire sent out by LP, unless you think he was lying?

[Lace]

     Ok apologies all round.   I didn't look back enough,  my posts are still there  a big  to all.

My only defence is that I am not well at the moment 

[sadie]

Not sure which you mean, Lace. I can see your exchanges with CM.

What is CM please, Carana?

[Carana]

He was commenting on DP's answers to the questionnaire sent out by LP, unless you think he was lying?

No, I don't see any reason why he would lie. He sounds more confused.

Did LP send out questionnaires? If so, when?

[Carana]

What is CM please, Carana?

Cheeky Monkey. Who I presume isn't Clarence Mitchell. LOL

[Robittybob1]

Fiona also.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/FIONA-PAYNE_16_05-07.htm  plus the Rogatory and the early one http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/FIONA-PAYNE.htm

So that is 3 statements from Fiona. 

[Robittybob1]

Maybe they refused. They weren't exactly under caution. They could just tell them to foxtrot oscar.

Under the rules of witness statement they can't refuse. They have to answer every question.  We covered this year or more ago.  Only if they declare themselves an arguido can they refuse to answer as I understand.

[Robittybob1]

    Ok apologies all round.   I didn't look back enough,  my posts are still there  a big  to all.

My only defence is that I am not well at the moment 

If you click on your name you can click show posts 

[The General]

Under the rules of witness statement they can't refuse. They have to answer every question.  We covered this year or more ago.  Only if they declare themselves an arguido can they refuse to answer as I understand.

I meant they could refuse to give a statement.

[Robittybob1]

I meant they could refuse to give a statement.

They would automatically be treated as an arguido, then get some rough treatment.

[G-Unit]

No, I don't see any reason why he would lie. He sounds more confused.

Did LP send out questionnaires? If so, when?

Yes. Before 24th October 2007.

[G-Unit]

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/FIONA-PAYNE_16_05-07.htm  plus the Rogatory and the early one http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/FIONA-PAYNE.htm

So that is 3 statements from Fiona.

The second one was her statement about Murat.