The Sun Poster gets more Interesting.... So I must be incorrect in a way... But it was there to help the Police I believe.......
At the bottom of the Poster in "white" writing it ha terms and conditions...
It states:
Sun Offer subject to terms and conditions and Editors discretion. For Full terms (Can't read next word) www.thesun.co.uk
Here are the terms and conditions....
THE Sun’s offer of a total of £50,000 reward is for information directly
resulting in the conviction of those responsible for the murder of Jo Yeates
and is subject to the following terms and conditions:-
1. The conditions set out hereunder are subject to variation only by the
Editor of The Sun.
2. The Editor of The Sun will, at all times, have absolute discretion over the
terms of offer, conditions and payment of any/all The Sun Reward offers.
3. All offers will be subject to these terms.
4. All offers will be made in good faith.
5. All claims must be made in writing.
6. All claimant(s) must provide information which leads directly to arrest and
conviction of Jo’s killer. In the event of more than one such conviction,
the £50,000 will remain the total on offer. In the event of more than person
such giving information, the reward will be divided.
7. A claimant(s) who in the reasonable belief of the Editor has any
foreknowledge of or criminal involvement in the crime which is the subject
of the Reward offer, will not be eligible to receive the reward (or any part
of it).
8. A claimant(s) who is an accomplice in the crime or in any way thereafter
assisted the perpetrators of the crime will not be eligible to receive the
reward (or any part of it).
9. A claimant(s) who is a relative (or former relative) of a participant in
the crime will not be eligible to receive the reward (or any part of it).
10. Serving police officers (or civilians working with or for the police) will
not be eligible to receive the reward (or any part of it)
Where do I start..... I believe the reward was there to assist the Police... and yes I know that is normal , but i am thinking that they were directing it again at someone....
Those responsible.... We are still at the idea of more than one killer.... This idea was dropped when we went to trial... They seemed happy that one man could commit this crime on his own and carry a dead weight several times, without leaving any drag marks... But I believe that they still believe that there was more than one person involved...
Number 8: Thereafter assisted in the crime.... Couldn't someone inadvertently assisted??
They have to have knowledge of what the Police believe happened..(imo) There must have been many who were aware of what happened to Joanna Yeates ...(imo)
Number 9 is an interesting one.....
9. A claimant(s) who is a relative (or former relative) of a participant in
the crime will not be eligible to receive the reward (or any part of it).
How can being related to someone when you are not involved dissolve you of claiming a reward??
The date of the terms and conditions is the 6th January 2011... The Police have Dr Vincent Tabak in their sights since late December 2010... (apparently)...The media say nothing of Dr Vincent Tabak's Interview in Holland, not even after his arrest.... And I am sure that they were aware of this.... (imo)
Dr Vincent Tabak is related to who?? No-one in this country as far as I am aware.... So that tells me they knew who the Police were looking for and it wasn't Dr Vincent Tabak.... I say this because of what Clegg had said in the Interview with Fiona Bruce... and how The Police told the media information......
Also if those who apparently helped Dr Vincent Tabak, were the people seen at the gate by CJ... then why hide the identity of the people CJ has seen at the gate.... There has to be another reason that the people CJ saw/heard at the gate are being kept quiet about....
Number 5: All claims made in writing??
That has me wondering if that is related to the Pizza Label and note that was received... ??
Former relative... That is specific, by anyones standards... So they must be referring to EX married partners, step children maybe....... But they know who they are looking for (imo)
This terms and conditions The Sun has given, in no-way supports that Dr Vincent Tabak is the man that they were looking for... He apparently had no girlfriend before Tanja Morson and was not married.. , and those members of his family in Holland would not get The Sun Newspaper... The Poster was put around Clifton.... So it has to be Clifton based (imo)
I believe the killer was from around that area, or the killers relatives/ ex relatives were from around that area... (imo) for them to just put the bulk of the Posters in Clifton....
I looked at the Tia sharp poster and that had terms and conditions, which are similar to these... But the Police and the media knew who had done harm to Tia Sharp... They knew it was the grandma's boyfriend Stuart Hazell and I believe that is why the terms and conditions apply.........
The Police knew that Tia Sharp had come to harm.. there had been no CCTV of her leaving her home... The conditions set out in the reward are for her safe return...
6. All claimant(s) must provide information which leads directly to police
safely finding missing Tia Sharp. In the event of more than one person
offering such information, the £25,000 the reward will be divided.
Again a reward for Mikaeel Kular...... (terms and conditions)
6. All claimant(s) must provide information which leads directly to police
safely finding missing Mikaeel Kular. In the event of more than one person
offering such information, the £25,000 the reward will be divided.
The Police already believed that harm had also come to this young boy...... (imo)
So when we looked at terms and conditions for Joanna Yeates, number 6 tells us what they are looking for..
6. All claimant(s) must provide information which leads directly to arrest and
conviction of Jo’s killer. In the event of more than one such conviction,
the £50,000 will remain the total on offer. In the event of more than person
such giving information, the reward will be divided.
Number 6 in the terms and conditions tells us what we need to know about any of these rewards... That is where the information lies....
It clearly demonstrates that there are many people who have knowledge of what happened to Joanna Yeates (imo)
It is tailored for that purpose... And I cannot believe that this was aimed at Dr Vincent Tabak.... Especially as they are still insisting that there was more than one person involved in this crime or have knowledge of this crime.. The information in terms and condition 6 tells us so.....
No-one came forward at trial to point the finger at Dr Vincent Tabak either, which make me also believe the reward was aimed at someone other than Dr Vincent Tabak.... The Police had to believe that the people involved were connected to each other ..(imo)
They know that they will not be paying this reward (imo) especially with the terms and conditions... I believe the reward for Joanna Yeates was aimed at the perpetrators and placing the posters around Clifton and on Joanna Yeates journey home, it has to be someone from that area or someone from the area has knowledge......
Dr Vincent Tabak is no longer living at Canygne Road by the 6th January 2011... he is on Aberdeen Road... His journey to work would not take him on the same path as Joanna Yeates Journey home... Neither Tanja Morson Journey would take her on that path either.... So I cannot see how it is aimed at either of those two... (imo)
And even if they ventured into the centre I cannot see their journey mimicking Joanna Yeates journey home.... They would avoid the area just by the demographics... So it has to be someone whom is in and around the area of Joanna Yeates journey home ...(imo) Or who was well aware of Joanna Yeates journey home.... As we do not know this journey fully and we do not know exactly where these posters were placed.... But going from the information we have been given we have to assume it is through Clifton Village to Canygne road stopping at various shops.
If Tanja Morson and Dr Vincent Tabak are no longer living in the vicinity.. they would not really have a need to take that particular journey...(imo) So the placing of the posters for them is pointless...(imo) It must be aimed at someone else....(imo)
It's a no brainer offering a reward for Information that you basically exclude everyone from claiming... The reward is aimed at specific person/persons and hopefully unnerving them...(imo)...
Terms and Conditions applying feature in the advert and the Picture of Joanna Yeates in Waitrose... All very strange... (imo)
https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/292463/reward-terms-and-conditions/https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/818015/25k-sun-reward-to-find-missing-tia/https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/513764/the-suns-25k-reward-to-find-missing-mikaeel-2/[attachment deleted by admin]