If it is only Dr Vincent Tabak's story which he doesn't divulge until he takes the stand in October 2011 that tells us how and why the DNA was where ever it was....
What happened before... When he said that they tests were false... What happened before when they kept him on remand.... Did any of the defence ever question the DNA at any point of Dr Vincent Tabak's incarceration??
What evidence did they have to keep him on remand??? Or to even charge him for that matter??
JustSaying... Assume nothing..... This case is made up of assumptions.... They have allowed everyone to fill in their own gaps...
Evidence the prosecution had????* Dr Vincent Tabak lived in the same building
* Dr Vincent Tabak drove a car
* Dr Vincent Tabak was apparently seen driving on Park Street on the 18th December 2010
* Dr Vincent Tabak went shopping in Asda
* Dr Vincent Tabak searched about things related to the case (like so many of us)
* Low Copy DNA was found ( They lived in the same building.. transfer) When was it transferred??
So that is it.... And remember before they even had Dr Vincent Tabak searched his car, what evidence did they have to arrest him with??
Until the apparent story comes into play months and months after his arrest and actually at trial, they had no- idea how Joanna Yeates was killed or even when she was killed...
So why on earth did Ann Redropp have Dr Vincent Tabak in her sights from late December 2010, when there was NO evidence to connect Dr Vincent Tabak to Joanna Yeates whatsoever!!!