Will European Law allow the use of Metadata to fight crime?

[Myster]

You and your malevolent gremlins as per usual  ...

[G-Unit]

No longer available (in maroon)

Jeez, that' pretty quick! 

Is there something in there that we are not allowed to see (by certain persons)?   Or is it only my computer?

The link doesn't work for me either. If the link below is copied and pasted into a new tab, however, the document comes up. Your attribution bias is, as usual imo, unfounded.


https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/331106/DRIPgovernmentNoteEC[Name removed]udgment.pdf

[Brietta]

The link doesn't work for me either. If the link below is copied and pasted into a new tab, however, the document comes up. Your attribution bias is, as usual imo, unfounded.


https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/331106/DRIPgovernmentNoteEC[Name removed]udgment.pdf

No need for that tone as far as a valued member is concerned, is there.

As a matter of fact my link doesn't work for me and neither does yours. So a glitch somewhere.  I got back to my original link by googling Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill: government note on ECJ judgment.

[Mr Gray]

The link doesn't work for me either. If the link below is copied and pasted into a new tab, however, the document comes up. Your attribution bias is, as usual imo, unfounded.


https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/331106/DRIPgovernmentNoteEC[Name removed]udgment.pdf

Sadie looks at the evidence and draws her conclusions... That's what everyone does including you.  I don't think you are in any position to accuse anyone of affirmation bias... I don't sre any difference between you and Sadie in that respect

[G-Unit]

Sadie looks at the evidence and draws her conclusions... That's what everyone does including you.  I don't think you are in any position to accuse anyone of affirmation bias... I don't sre any difference between you and Sadie in that respect

Where's her evidence that someone's trying to stop people from reading that document?

[Mr Gray]

Where's her evidence that someone's trying to stop people from reading that document?

Not interested in a discussion as you dont supply decent evidence for things you claim. I think Sadies theory is more believable than things you and other sceptics come up with

[G-Unit]

Not interested in a discussion as you dont supply decent evidence for things you claim. I think Sadies theory is more believable than things you and other sceptics come up with

That some malevolent people spend their time altering the colour of folders, the content of videos and destroying internet links?

[Mr Gray]

That some malevolent people spend their time altering the colour of folders, the content of videos and destroying internet links?

That Maddie died in an accident covered up by the tapas  group... Ridiculous...

[Myster]

It'll be them Russians.

... or more likely the Mysterons.

[sadie]

That some malevolent people spend their time altering the colour of folders, the content of videos and destroying internet links?

That is not part of sadies Theory as you must well know.


The three things that you mention are observations that all members should be aware of ... and for the sake of Justice complaining about, but everyone seems very laid back about this altering of facts.   Few seem to complain, so I have to.  I would prefer not to have to do it, but I can't stand lies and injustices standing.

[G-Unit]

That is not part of sadies Theory as you must well know.


The three things that you mention are observations that all members should be aware of ... and for the sake of Justice complaining about, but everyone seems very laid back about this altering of facts.   Few seem to complain, so I have to.  I would prefer not to have to do it, but I can't stand lies and injustices standing.

I know that, and I never said it was. It was another member who mentioned your theory.

The reason no-one else mentions your 'altering of facts', imo, is that you're the only one who thinks it's happened.

[Brietta]

I know that, and I never said it was. It was another member who mentioned your theory.

The reason no-one else mentions your 'altering of facts', imo, is that you're the only one who thinks it's happened.

Any chance we can now continue discussing the thread topic?

[G-Unit]

Any chance we can now continue discussing the thread topic?

That will depend on whether the thread is taken off topic again, won't it?