I lost interest when I reached the John Stalker misrepresentation. That was at 5:11.
I lost interest when I read all the different 'lies' K&G were supposed to have told people about how they found the shutters. It's quite obvious to me that what different people related to others was
their own interpretation of what they had been told by two extremely upset - (hysterical in Gerry's case) people over the phone.
A neighbour of mine recently died. She had been housebound for years with arthritis. This is a small village - news travels fast and folk knew I did her shopping for her I had several phone calls from people asking about her death. I had virtually the same conversation about her with them all, and once mentioned that she hadn't been to bed for 4 years (because lying down was too painful). In a phone call later on I was asked if it was true that she hadn't been to bed for
14 years!!! This is what happens when news is passed on by word of mouth. But it's quite normal.
Common sense alone should tell people that Kate and Gerry were not going to claim shutters were 'smashed' etc etc. when it was quite obvious to everyone there that they were not. None of those other people
were there or had ever seen the place and were having to 'visualise' what had happened on the strength of what they'd been told by two parents in total shock. To believe that they all repeated word for word what Kate and Gerry had said is ridiculous. They were using their own words and their own 'imaginings' of what had happened.
The fact that the video maker doesn't appear to even understand how those different 'versions' of the shutter story came to be doesn't bode well for the rest of the documentary IMO -( but which I shall try to watch later - if this rain carries on).