Maddie cops pursue mysterious woman in purple?

[faithlilly]

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4635087/madeleine-mccann-investigation-critical-witness-portugal/


Published 7th Oct 2017

"Sources say she lived near the holiday flat in Praia da Luz on the Algarve from which Madeleine, then aged three, vanished in May 2007 but left the country after her husband’s death.

Scotland Yard’s £12million Operation Grange hunt for Madeleine was kept open with an extra £154,000 to trace the woman.

A source said: “She may have seen or heard something which to her may seem insignificant but to us could prove vital. If she recognises herself she should contact police. She has nothing to fear. This is just to eliminate her from enquiries."

A source close to Operation Grange, launched in 2011, described the woman as a “critical line of inquiry’’.

So if this woman is such a 'critical line of enquiry' why aren't SY appealing for her to come forward on their website, or Facebook page or Twitter feed ? As 'the source' says she has nothing to fear.

Further why do they need £154,000 to find her as  they must be aware of her name as why would an innocent person change it ?

604

[Robittybob1]

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4635087/madeleine-mccann-investigation-critical-witness-portugal/


Published 7th Oct 2017

"Sources say she lived near the holiday flat in Praia da Luz on the Algarve from which Madeleine, then aged three, vanished in May 2007 but left the country after her husband’s death.

Scotland Yard’s £12million Operation Grange hunt for Madeleine was kept open with an extra £154,000 to trace the woman.

A source said: “She may have seen or heard something which to her may seem insignificant but to us could prove vital. If she recognises herself she should contact police. She has nothing to fear. This is just to eliminate her from enquiries."

A source close to Operation Grange, launched in 2011, described the woman as a “critical line of inquiry’’.

So if this woman is such a 'critical line of enquiry' why aren't SY appealing for her to come forward on their website, or Facebook page or Twitter feed ? As 'the source' says she has nothing to fear.

Further why do they need £154,000 to find her as  they must be aware of her name as why would an innocent person change it ?

It could be what she knows, what she has been told, what she has seen.

[stephen25000]

It could be what she knows, what she has been told, what she has seen.

OR simply nothing of any consequence whatsoever.

So is this the reason for £150,000 ?

[Benice]

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4635087/madeleine-mccann-investigation-critical-witness-portugal/


Published 7th Oct 2017

"Sources say she lived near the holiday flat in Praia da Luz on the Algarve from which Madeleine, then aged three, vanished in May 2007 but left the country after her husband’s death.

Scotland Yard’s £12million Operation Grange hunt for Madeleine was kept open with an extra £154,000 to trace the woman.

A source said: “She may have seen or heard something which to her may seem insignificant but to us could prove vital. If she recognises herself she should contact police. She has nothing to fear. This is just to eliminate her from enquiries."

A source close to Operation Grange, launched in 2011, described the woman as a “critical line of inquiry’’.

So if this woman is such a 'critical line of enquiry' why aren't SY appealing for her to come forward on their website, or Facebook page or Twitter feed ? As 'the source' says she has nothing to fear.

Further why do they need £154,000 to find her as  they must be aware of her name as why would an innocent person change it ?

I see every reporter's bezzie invisible friend - 'a source'  has been credited with this 'information' and so should be taken with a very large pinch of salt IMO.

Just another attempt to boost sales IMO.

[Robittybob1]

OR simply nothing of any consequence whatsoever.

So is this the reason for £150,000 ?

You seem to look at the glass as half empty rather than half full.

[barrier]

You seem to look at the glass as half empty rather than half full.

Come on Rob,six years, multi millions,Grange are now reduced to a sauce,really?

[Robittybob1]

Come on Rob,six years, multi millions,Grange are now reduced to a sauce,really?

It hasn't been easy. 

[barrier]

It hasn't been easy.

Any one who thought finding an alleged abductor which hasn't even been proved to exist is/was deluded.imo

[stephen25000]

You seem to look at the glass as half empty rather than half full.

What has this investigation achieved other than wild speculation, and let's not forget the sources.....................

Meanwhile......

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4959766/Police-searching-Madeleine-McCann-critical-witness.html

[Robittybob1]

Any one who thought finding an alleged abductor which hasn't even been proved to exist is/was deluded.imo

That is the case in any abduction the finding and existence go hand in hand.

[Robittybob1]

What has this investigation achieved other than wild speculation, and let's not forget the sources.....................

Meanwhile......

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4959766/Police-searching-Madeleine-McCann-critical-witness.html

Think of all the people that have been eliminated.  To eliminate someone must be an achievement.

[stephen25000]

Think of all the people that have been eliminated.  To eliminate someone must be an achievement.

You are still presuming there was an abduction Rob, and you know my views on that.

[Robittybob1]

You are still presuming there was an abduction Rob, and you know my views on that.

I was talking generally. 
That is the case in any abduction the finding and existence generally go hand in hand.

[jassi]

Think of all the people that have been eliminated.  To eliminate someone must be an achievement.

Not if it was likely a dead cert  that these people were not involved in the first place.

[Robittybob1]

Not if it was likely a dead cert  that these people were not involved in the first place.

There were guys in 5C  during the day were they eliminated? How can you say who is a "dead cert"?