Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views

[justsaying]

if it was freshly laundered the dna did well to remain, The whole info regarding the t shirt and suggestion of whose it actually was is cloudy to say the least .

The owner and the scenario were too quickly accepted

I agree.

If it was freshly laundered then how did only one set of DNA remain and not the other? If it was not freshly laundered then how was the sisters DNA not there also?

[jixy]

Even the events leading up to the Sister suggesting it was hers are strange too like the suggestion was put to them not the other way round!

[justsaying]

Even the events leading up to the Sister suggesting it was hers are strange too like the suggestion was put to them not the other way round!

More to the point how can it be assumed fact that [Name removed] borrowed the t-shirt without asking? It was not like she could just pop into the sisters bedroom and take it, the sister did not live in the same house...

[jixy]

Considering the implications if she hadnt borrowed it, it is quite unbelievable

[Nicholas]

How have I missed the point? Shane didn't have experience of giving evidence in a murder trial. He was embarrassed by the porn revelation. He couldn't say that Luke was definitely in the house but he also couldn't say he definitely wasn't. So he may not have been able to support the alibi but he didn't refute the alibi either.

Correct me if I'm wrong but all charges were dropped against Shane and his Mum.

Will you answer a question now? Why do you attach no significance to the rest of the search party all completely changing their statements regarding Luke's behaviour that night?

What did the SCCRC say in response to Shane Mitchell's evidence? I'm presuming submissions were made regarding this aspect of the trial? The police ruled the others out as suspects. What significance should I attach?

[Nicholas]

If you want to keep referring to Simon why do you not make up a thread where you can do so without annoying people. I do not have an opinion of you, you are not that important!

There's a wealth of evidence showing the contrary!

[justsaying]

What did the SCCRC say in response to Shane Mitchell's evidence? I'm presuming submissions were made regarding this aspect of the trial? The police ruled the others out as suspects. What significance should I attach?

And what was the reason for ruling them out as quickly as they did? Just their own word, nothing else!

The boys at the V when the murder was supposed to have taken place... at the time when the moped was not running and was propped against the wall with the 2 boys missing, how do you think they failed to hear such a brutal crime taking place? Why did they not come forward earlier and only did so because witnesses put them at the scene? Why were they allowed to say they could not remember what they were doing when the moped was unattended? Why the heck did the police not put more weight on these facts? Because they only had Luke in their vision, that is why!

[justsaying]

There's a wealth of evidence showing the contrary!

Again, that is your opinion! Back to Luke!

[Nicholas]

Considering the implications if she hadnt borrowed it, it is quite unbelievable

Describe the implications to which you refer

[justsaying]

And what was the reason for ruling them out as quickly as they did? Just their own word, nothing else!

The boys at the V when the murder was supposed to have taken place... at the time when the moped was not running and was propped against the wall with the 2 boys missing, how do you think they failed to hear such a brutal crime taking place? Why did they not come forward earlier and only did so because witnesses put them at the scene? Why were they allowed to say they could not remember what they were doing when the moped was unattended? Why the heck did the police not put more weight on these facts? Because they only had Luke in their vision, that is why!

Would you care to answer these questions? Or is it again the case these are questions for which there is no answer?

[Nicholas]

And what was the reason for ruling them out as quickly as they did? Just their own word, nothing else!

The boys at the V when the murder was supposed to have taken place... at the time when the moped was not running and was propped against the wall with the 2 boys missing, how do you think they failed to hear such a brutal crime taking place? Why did they not come forward earlier and only did so because witnesses put them at the scene? Why were they allowed to say they could not remember what they were doing when the moped was unattended? Why the heck did the police not put more weight on these facts? Because they only had Luke in their vision, that is why!

What did Lukes defence team say about this?

[justsaying]

What did Lukes defence team say about this?

You tell me, you seem to have all the facts and full information.

[justsaying]

Describe the implications to which you refer

Why don't you answer some of the questions put to you?

[Nicholas]

You tell me, you seem to have all the facts and full information.

"Scott Forbes put forward Mr Kane's name

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=594.0

[justsaying]

"Scott Forbes put forward Mr Kane's name

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=594.0

You do a great job of dodging questions you cannot answer.