Is Luke Mitchell guilty - your views

[Nicholas]

Why don't you answer some of the questions put to you?

 

why don't you stop telling people what to do!

[Nicholas]

And what was the reason for ruling them out as quickly as they did? Just their own word, nothing else!

The boys at the V when the murder was supposed to have taken place... at the time when the moped was not running and was propped against the wall with the 2 boys missing, how do you think they failed to hear such a brutal crime taking place? Why did they not come forward earlier and only did so because witnesses put them at the scene? Why were they allowed to say they could not remember what they were doing when the moped was unattended? Why the heck did the police not put more weight on these facts? Because they only had Luke in their vision, that is why!

Would you care to answer these questions? Or is it again the case these are questions for which there is no answer?

It's already answered

"Scott Forbes put forward Mr Kane's name

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=594.0

[justsaying]

Just taking a leaf out of your book Stephanie, as Jixy has said, you can give it out but you sure cannot take it!

[justsaying]

It's already answered

So you agree there is no answer for these things which are truly questionable? That in itself must tell you that there is something seriously wrong with the way Luke was treated in comparison with others who had no alibi either and  who were right at the scene of the murder at the relevant times.

[justsaying]

Don't you have a mind of your own?

Sure do, but if its good enough for the goose...

[jixy]

And what was the reason for ruling them out as quickly as they did? Just their own word, nothing else!

The boys at the V when the murder was supposed to have taken place... at the time when the moped was not running and was propped against the wall with the 2 boys missing, how do you think they failed to hear such a brutal crime taking place? Why did they not come forward earlier and only did so because witnesses put them at the scene? Why were they allowed to say they could not remember what they were doing when the moped was unattended? Why the heck did the police not put more weight on these facts? Because they only had Luke in their vision, that is why!

Everything connected to those 2 was a complete mess but it was allowed. Luke didnt have the same opportunity

[Nicholas]

So you agree there is no answer for these things which are truly questionable? That in itself must tell you that there is something seriously wrong with the way Luke was treated in comparison with others who had no alibi either and  who were right at the scene of the murder at the relevant times.

Manipulation won't change the facts.

Other suspects were ruled out!

[jixy]

So you agree there is no answer for these things which are truly questionable? That in itself must tell you that there is something seriously wrong with the way Luke was treated in comparison with others who had no alibi either and  who were right at the scene of the murder at the relevant times.

There is a massive difference in the way Luke was treated. Take the Police man asking an innocent 14 year old to take him to the body of his girlfriend. When would that happen? The only child in the search party but on occasion they assumed he was alone. How can that be?

[justsaying]

Manipulation won't change the facts.

Other suspects were ruled out!

What facts am I manipulating?

On what basis were they ruled out - on the basis they could not remember what they were doing there or why they were missing from their moped. Please!

[Nicholas]

Everything connected to those 2 was a complete mess but it was allowed. Luke didnt have the same opportunity

And if you were familiar with other cases you'll know this isn't unique. Doesn't make them guilty nor does what you've posted point away from Luke Mitchell's guilt!

[jixy]

Manipulation won't change the facts.

Other suspects were ruled out!

Not sure how many times this has been said now but the question is why were they ruled out? their original statements totally changed shape and facts!

[Nicholas]

What facts am I manipulating?

These

So you agree there is no answer for these things which are truly questionable? That in itself must tell you that there is something seriously wrong with the way Luke was treated in comparison with others who had no alibi either and  who were right at the scene of the murder at the relevant times.

[justsaying]

There is a massive difference in the way Luke was treated. Take the Police man asking an innocent 14 year old to take him to the body of his girlfriend. When would that happen? The only child in the search party but on occasion they assumed he was alone. How can that be?

Exactly! There were others there who were treated with kid-gloves, everyone, apart from the 14 year old child!

[jixy]

What facts am I manipulating?

On what basis were they ruled out - on the basis they could not remember what they were doing there or why they were missing from their moped. Please!

The very same moped that drown out any noise yet it was quite acceptable to be stood not making any noise without a valid reason or explanation as to where they were or most importantly what they were doing!

[Nicholas]

On what basis were they ruled out - on the basis they could not remember what they were doing there or why they were missing from their moped. Please!

You tell me

https://www.scotsman.com/news/mitchell-legal-team-drops-interest-in-jodi-suspect-1-1154608