Could Virginia’s wedding have been called off - if she was getting married - and she was attempting to patch things up and Anji’s story was to help her sister
Or did Bamber put Anji up to it?
The following is an excerpt from Roger Wilkes book Blood Relations and he seems to have taken Anji’s words from the Sun news story
‘I was giving him the love in bed she should have been giving him,’she told the paper. ‘She was just giving him mouth.’
Bamber went all out to smear Julie and used people to do his dirty work for him - people who had never met her
Excerpts from Roger Wilkes book ‘Blood Relations’
’A 24-year-old woman named Sabina Butt struck up a relationship with Jeremy Bamber by offering to become his pen friend. She visited him at Wormwood Scrubs in the early months of his sentence, representing herself to tabloid journalists as the heiress of a multi-million-pound manufacturing empire. ‘I can’t believe he’s the evil monster he’s made out to be,’ said Miss Butt. ‘He told me he’s innocent and I believe him.’ Accordingly, the young woman announced she was pledging the family fortune to finance an appeal. Not long after this, a reporter traced Sabina Butt to the humble council house where she lived. The affair shrivelled on the spot. Who’s idea was it to tell the media Sabina was ‘the heiress of a multi-million-pound manufacturing empire’ - Sabina’s or Bambers?
Two years into his sentence, Bamber was reported to be having ‘steamy jail sex sessions’ with a busty 23-year-old blonde called Jayne Beardsley. These, too, ceased when details (including an extract of one of Bamber’s letters to ‘Dearest Jayne’) were published across two pages of a Sunday newspaper. Why did journalists seem so interested in telling the stories of Anji, Sabina, Jayne and co ?
A third such liaison met a similar fate. In 1991 a pretty 18-year-old retail trainee from Yorkshire, Nikky O’Hare, became interested in Bamber’s case and began writing to him. She visited him frequently in prison, and became involved in his efforts to have his case referred to the appeal court. In December 1992, her story appeared in a rival Sunday paper. The young woman claimed Bamber had made her pregnant during ‘steamy four-times-a-week sex sessions behind bars’ but that she had lost the child through a miscarriage. These ‘sessions’ had taken place during visiting hours. Miss O’Hare had been given accreditation to visit Bamber as a member of his defence team, and this entitled the couple to meet in a private interview room. ‘It was just a ruse for us to have sex,’ Bamber was reported as saying. The young woman in question was said to be considering a career in the police force or prison service. How and why were HM prison service allowing a mass murderer, child killer and sexual predator time alone with a young women ?
All this titillation obscured Jeremy Bamber’s real concerns. A few weeks after his trial, he announced through his lawyers that he planned to launch an appeal against his convictions for murder. He had protested his innocence from the outset, and he was determined that one day – sooner rather than later – he would prove his innocence, and walk out into the waiting world a free man.[/i]Did all this titillation’ also obscure the authors ‘concerns’ ?
