JB's Claims Published In Maldon Standard

[Holly Goodhead]

http://www.maldonandburnhamstandard.co.uk/news/16178432.Convicted_killer_asks_for_evidence_to_be_disclosed_to_allow_for_third_appeal/

This is something JB and his most fervent supporters have been beating the drum about for a long time.  The court will not be remotely interested in paper trails and theories of two silencers, albeit JB et al could well be right ie there may well have been two silencers sent to FSS.  The court will be concerned with the one silencer exhibited at trial.  At 2002 appeal MT QC attempted to appeal against the hand swabs on the basis they had been swapped and this was simply batted away (see CoA doc points 175 - 213 http://www.maldonandburnhamstandard.co.uk/news/16178432.Convicted_killer_asks_for_evidence_to_be_disclosed_to_allow_for_third_appeal/)

When John Hayward, biologist responsible for the blood stained exhibits, was sworn in at trial the trial judge asked Rivlin the following:

MR JUSTICE DRAKE:  Now, Mr Rivlin, the witness is going to be asked about a large number of items which later on he is going to tell us about, is there any dispute that they were transmitted properly to him, or where they were found?

MR RIVLIN:  No, my Lord.

MR JUSTICE DRAKE:  Then we need not bother with the transmission, and the jury can assume the formalities have been gone through.

I'v been unable to upload John Hayward's testimony to this post but it's in the link here:

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7845.msg379422#msg379422

[Nicholas]

http://www.maldonandburnhamstandard.co.uk/news/16178432.Convicted_killer_asks_for_evidence_to_be_disclosed_to_allow_for_third_appeal/

This is something JB and his most fervent supporters have been beating the drum about for a long time.  The court will not be remotely interested in paper trails and theories of two silencers, albeit JB et al could well be right ie there may well have been two silencers sent to FSS.  The court will be concerned with the one silencer exhibited at trial.  At 2002 appeal MT QC attempted to appeal against the hand swabs on the basis they had been swapped and this was simply batted away (see CoA doc points 175 - 213 http://www.maldonandburnhamstandard.co.uk/news/16178432.Convicted_killer_asks_for_evidence_to_be_disclosed_to_allow_for_third_appeal/)

When John Hayward, biologist responsible for the blood stained exhibits, was sworn in at trial the trial judge asked Rivlin the following:

MR JUSTICE DRAKE:  Now, Mr Rivlin, the witness is going to be asked about a large number of items which later on he is going to tell us about, is there any dispute that they were transmitted properly to him, or where they were found?

MR RIVLIN:  No, my Lord.

MR JUSTICE DRAKE:  Then we need not bother with the transmission, and the jury can assume the formalities have been gone through.

I'v been unable to upload John Hayward's testimony to this post but it's in the link here:

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7845.msg379422#msg379422

Jeremy Bamber has most certainly made a fool of himself; yet again!

I'm really surprised you cannot see through Bamber's deceit Holly?

[Holly Goodhead]

Jeremy Bamber has most certainly made a fool of himself; yet again!

I'm really surprised you cannot see through Bamber's deceit Holly?

I take no notice of anything JB and his supporters do or say etc.  I form my own opinions on my own research.

[John]

http://www.maldonandburnhamstandard.co.uk/news/16178432.Convicted_killer_asks_for_evidence_to_be_disclosed_to_allow_for_third_appeal/

This is something JB and his most fervent supporters have been beating the drum about for a long time.  The court will not be remotely interested in paper trails and theories of two silencers, albeit JB et al could well be right ie there may well have been two silencers sent to FSS.  The court will be concerned with the one silencer exhibited at trial.  At 2002 appeal MT QC attempted to appeal against the hand swabs on the basis they had been swapped and this was simply batted away (see CoA doc points 175 - 213 http://www.maldonandburnhamstandard.co.uk/news/16178432.Convicted_killer_asks_for_evidence_to_be_disclosed_to_allow_for_third_appeal/)

When John Hayward, biologist responsible for the blood stained exhibits, was sworn in at trial the trial judge asked Rivlin the following:

MR JUSTICE DRAKE:  Now, Mr Rivlin, the witness is going to be asked about a large number of items which later on he is going to tell us about, is there any dispute that they were transmitted properly to him, or where they were found?

MR RIVLIN:  No, my Lord.

MR JUSTICE DRAKE:  Then we need not bother with the transmission, and the jury can assume the formalities have been gone through.

I'v been unable to upload John Hayward's testimony to this post but it's in the link here:

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7845.msg379422#msg379422

An interesting find Holly, don't know why this newspaper is giving the case any exposure as the sound moderators are in my view irrelevant anyway.  The main evidence is the forensics involving Sheila and the fight in the kitchen which she could never have been involved in.  If Bamber is looking for a technical reason to overturn the conviction without addressing the real evidence I fear he is deluding himself.

[Nicholas]

I take no notice of anything JB and his supporters do or say etc.  I form my own opinions on my own research.

I must say I find it odd you claiming to take no notice of what Bamber says. Why's that Holly? Surely you need a starting point based on innocence otherwise it makes no sense why you have spent so many years focused on his case in the first place?

[Nicholas]

An interesting find Holly, don't know why this newspaper is giving the case any exposure as the sound moderators are in my view irrelevant anyway.  The main evidence is the forensics involving Sheila and the fight in the kitchen which she could never have been involved in.  If Bamber is looking for a technical reason to overturn the conviction without addressing the real evidence I fear he is deluding himself.

According to Poppy Miller's blog and news articles associated to her, I think that's her neck of the woods. She may have twisted someone's arm? Or maybe news in Maldon and Burnham is sparse?

[Nicholas]

Here's what David is claiming:

"No, the ballistic photographic evidence shows the blood was planted. You need to realise that much of this summing is a result of bad defence strategy." http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9404.msg438091.html?PHPSESSID=ajl4br58ds63cdjs76s69bijl7#msg438091

Though he did claim:

"Anyway blaming people is something that should be done after a conviction is overturned. Doing such things prior can be counter productuve http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9402.msg438077.html#msg438077

 

Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!" (Sir Walter Scott, 1808).

[Nicholas]

An interesting find Holly, don't know why this newspaper is giving the case any exposure as the sound moderators are in my view irrelevant anyway.  The main evidence is the forensics involving Sheila and the fight in the kitchen which she could never have been involved in.  If Bamber is looking for a technical reason to overturn the conviction without addressing the real evidence I fear he is deluding himself.

Wendy Brading could be another reason?

She's written news stories on Bamber in the past, as she once did for Simon Hall.

http://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/14631374._30_years_of_journalism_has_gone_in_the_blink_of_an_eye___Wendy_Brading_celebrates_30_years_at_the_Gazette/

"I have interviewed convicted killer Jeremy Bamber in Category A prisons

He most probably charmed her? 

I'm going with it being linked to Wendy Brading. If you google her name along with Bambers it throws up numerous articles; including this one http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/14616124.Emmerdale_actress_narrates_video_released_to_mark_30_year_anniversary_of_Jeremy_Bamber_mass_murder_sentence/

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8610.msg410558.html?PHPSESSID=5ieanqlho3h3m1oe006dvh0ie5#msg410558

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=4690.210

http://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/14637257.Battered__controlled_and_abused___the_women_who_seek_shelter_at_Colchester_s_Women_s_Refuge/

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6530.msg261476#msg261476 I

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/10739904.display/

[Holly Goodhead]

An interesting find Holly, don't know why this newspaper is giving the case any exposure as the sound moderators are in my view irrelevant anyway.  The main evidence is the forensics involving Sheila and the fight in the kitchen which she could never have been involved in.  If Bamber is looking for a technical reason to overturn the conviction without addressing the real evidence I fear he is deluding himself.

I can't take the credit for the find.  I think it was Caroline ? on one of the other threads.

Yes the forensics need undermining not the paperwork trails.

[Holly Goodhead]

I must say I find it odd you claiming to take no notice of what Bamber says. Why's that Holly? Surely you need a starting point based on innocence otherwise it makes no sense why you have spent so many years focused on his case in the first place?

Trial testimony from experts, Dr Ferguson's WS, WS's from police and lay witnesses, autopsy reports, Dr Lincoln's report etc plus my own research. 

[Nicholas]

Wendy Brading could be another reason?

She's written news stories on Bamber in the past, as she once did for Simon Hall.

http://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/14631374._30_years_of_journalism_has_gone_in_the_blink_of_an_eye___Wendy_Brading_celebrates_30_years_at_the_Gazette/

"I have interviewed convicted killer Jeremy Bamber in Category A prisons

He most probably charmed her? 

I'm going with it being linked to Wendy Brading. If you google her name along with Bambers it throws up numerous articles; including this one http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/14616124.Emmerdale_actress_narrates_video_released_to_mark_30_year_anniversary_of_Jeremy_Bamber_mass_murder_sentence/

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8610.msg410558.html?PHPSESSID=5ieanqlho3h3m1oe006dvh0ie5#msg410558

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=4690.210

http://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/14637257.Battered__controlled_and_abused___the_women_who_seek_shelter_at_Colchester_s_Women_s_Refuge/

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6530.msg261476#msg261476 I

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/10739904.display/

It appears to me Wendy Brading could be a supporter?

"David Cameron to Jeremy Bamber who is currently serving a life tariff in a high security prison after being convicted of the murders of five members of his family
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/wendy-brading-753762111

[Daisy]

You are right once again Steph. Wendy is a friend of Jeremy and on his telephone list. I wouldn’t necessarily say she is a supporter but like any journalist likes to be the first in the know. I am sure Jeremy phoned her to give her the heads up then sent the information to her.

[Nicholas]

You are right once again Steph. Wendy is a friend of Jeremy and on his telephone list. I wouldn’t necessarily say she is a supporter but like any journalist likes to be the first in the know. I am sure Jeremy phoned her to give her the heads up then sent the information to her.

Do you think she may be "Claire Powell?"

I'm suspicious of this link Daisy because I have high expectations when it comes to good journalism

[Nicholas]

You are right once again Steph. Wendy is a friend of Jeremy and on his telephone list. I wouldn’t necessarily say she is a supporter but like any journalist likes to be the first in the know. I am sure Jeremy phoned her to give her the heads up then sent the information to her.

Wendy Brading stated in July 2016:

"Truth and transparency are fundamental and journalists must combine being creative with being informative.

At some points over the years, journalism lost its way a little and, to a degree, the public’s respect. However, I am still a profound believer that journalism is a force for good.

It is a cornerstone of democracy and justice. It holds the powers that be to account, it strives for transparency and exposes wrong-doing. One of its greatest assets is to give people a voice. http://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/14631374._30_years_of_journalism_has_gone_in_the_blink_of_an_eye___Wendy_Brading_celebrates_30_years_at_the_Gazette/

I wonder if Ms Brading has ever considered she may have lost her way in relation to Jeremy Bamber and some of her work may be behind why the public have lost their respect?

I didn't find the recent news article informative one iota. It's totally shameful! It's dragging out the inevitable. Jeremy Bamber has nowhere else to go and he just clings to those few people he's managed to dupe along the way.

[Nicholas]

You are right once again Steph. Wendy is a friend of Jeremy and on his telephone list. I wouldn’t necessarily say she is a supporter but like any journalist likes to be the first in the know. I am sure Jeremy phoned her to give her the heads up then sent the information to her.

What makes you think she isn't a supporter?

Did he talk about her a lot?

You appear to have much knowledge on Bamber Daisy? Why don't you share more?