Author Topic: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.  (Read 52250 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Brietta

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #105 on: August 05, 2017, 08:49:00 PM »
Why are you so upset at the idea that the McCanns wanted to be in control of what was said to the press? It makes sense to me.

Doesn't bother me one way or t'other ... but it certainly does seem to have served over the years as a convenient hook for some on which to hang their obsessive dislike of the McCann family ... if the internet is anything to go by.

It really is so simple ... the reason for reluctance to speak to the press was as a result of fear of the repercussions to which they would have subjected themselves to had they fallen foul of the law.

Snip
Rachael Oldfield, one of the so-called Tapas Seven, accused detectives of "outrageous" leaking of case information to the media.

She said officers were guilty of "double standards" for insisting the group obey strict secrecy laws.

She told the BBC: "They leaked information and these rumours that have flown around for the past year - it is outrageous. We have all felt very angry about it.


Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate - sent direct to you
 Read more
"We were asked to comply with the Portuguese judicial secrecy laws [under] which we were made to understand that we could face two years in prison for speaking out.

"So, as a group, we have not said anything from day one. There have been all these rumours flying around and leaks from sources close to the PJ [Policia Judiciaria], which we haven't been able to refute.

"We would have loved to have spoken out really and just put the record straight, but believed that the investigation would be the best way of finding Madeleine if we cooperated with the police and complied by their rules and regulations."

Oldfield made her comments in the documentary Searching for Madeleine, which will be broadcast tonight on Radio 4.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/apr/24/madeleinemccann

They kept their mouths shut in defence of their own reputations which were being deliberately dragged through the mud to protect the integrity of the police investigation into the disappearance of a much loved and missing child.

How sad is it that the police did not demonstrate the same devotion to their duty of finding Madeleine McCann and upholding the law.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #106 on: August 05, 2017, 09:38:49 PM »
Doesn't bother me one way or t'other ... but it certainly does seem to have served over the years as a convenient hook for some on which to hang their obsessive dislike of the McCann family ... if the internet is anything to go by.

It really is so simple ... the reason for reluctance to speak to the press was as a result of fear of the repercussions to which they would have subjected themselves to had they fallen foul of the law.

Snip
Rachael Oldfield, one of the so-called Tapas Seven, accused detectives of "outrageous" leaking of case information to the media.

She said officers were guilty of "double standards" for insisting the group obey strict secrecy laws.

She told the BBC: "They leaked information and these rumours that have flown around for the past year - it is outrageous. We have all felt very angry about it.


Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate - sent direct to you
 Read more
"We were asked to comply with the Portuguese judicial secrecy laws [under] which we were made to understand that we could face two years in prison for speaking out.

"So, as a group, we have not said anything from day one. There have been all these rumours flying around and leaks from sources close to the PJ [Policia Judiciaria], which we haven't been able to refute.

"We would have loved to have spoken out really and just put the record straight, but believed that the investigation would be the best way of finding Madeleine if we cooperated with the police and complied by their rules and regulations."

Oldfield made her comments in the documentary Searching for Madeleine, which will be broadcast tonight on Radio 4.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/apr/24/madeleinemccann

They kept their mouths shut in defence of their own reputations which were being deliberately dragged through the mud to protect the integrity of the police investigation into the disappearance of a much loved and missing child.

How sad is it that the police did not demonstrate the same devotion to their duty of finding Madeleine McCann and upholding the law.

According to Sol in June 2007 they spoke to Russell O'Brien on the phone and he said;

“I have nothing further to tell you. I am not going to dishonour the compromise I assumed with Kate and Gerry. They want to control all information that is disclosed”.
https://joana-morais.blogspot.co.uk/2008/03/madeleine-case-pact-of-silence.html?m=0

An official denial was issued via Clarence Mitchell in October 2007 for some reason.

It is rumoured that the PJ leaked, but as we have seen with the UK media and Operation Grange, that doesn't mean they actually did say anything.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #107 on: August 05, 2017, 11:52:21 PM »
According to Sol in June 2007 they spoke to Russell O'Brien on the phone and he said;

“I have nothing further to tell you. I am not going to dishonour the compromise I assumed with Kate and Gerry. They want to control all information that is disclosed”.
https://joana-morais.blogspot.co.uk/2008/03/madeleine-case-pact-of-silence.html?m=0

An official denial was issued via Clarence Mitchell in October 2007 for some reason.

It is rumoured that the PJ leaked, but as we have seen with the UK media and Operation Grange, that doesn't mean they actually did say anything.

Are you sure an official denial over something so absurdly trivial was issued by Clarence Mitchell?  Was he not pointing out that in his job he was not controlling the media?
The old "Monitor" in English which translates to "controlar" in Portuguese thing, which I've already mentioned.

Perhaps you would be good enough to supply a cite in support of your post ... then it might be a good idea to desist from deflecting from the topic which is ... Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.

The leaks from the investigation to the Portuguese press were not designed to further Madeleine's case they were aimed at damaging her parents' reputation.  At doing that, they have been very successful indeed in some quarters.

The problem is though, that the tactic used by the police of blatantly breaking the law and directing resources to one end calls into question just what it was they were doing to further Madeleine's investigation.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #108 on: August 06, 2017, 08:48:34 AM »
Russell was quoted by Sol in June 2007. I'm not sure why the denial was issued in October, but it was. I'm not deflecting because it's connected to Judicial secrecy according to the T7. As with the UK media, I expect most of the stories in Portugal were wild guesses when an unnamed source is mentioned. Perhaps cites supporting the accusations that the stories originated with the PJ could be provided?

"We wish to state that there is categorically no ‘pact of silence’ or indeed anything secretive between us - just the desire to assist the search for Madeleine," they said in a joint statement, released by the McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell.
"From day one, the police in Portugal told us not to discuss our statements.
"It is incredibly frustrating for us that the fact we have done as we were asked to by the Portuguese police is still being looked upon as suspicious.
"Everything we have done, and continue to do, has been to help with the search for Madeleine and to end this nightmare for Gerry and Kate."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1567702/Madeleine-McCann-Friends-deny-silence-pact.html
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #109 on: August 06, 2017, 02:19:32 PM »
Russell was quoted by Sol in June 2007. I'm not sure why the denial was issued in October, but it was. I'm not deflecting because it's connected to Judicial secrecy according to the T7. As with the UK media, I expect most of the stories in Portugal were wild guesses when an unnamed source is mentioned. Perhaps cites supporting the accusations that the stories originated with the PJ could be provided?

"We wish to state that there is categorically no ‘pact of silence’ or indeed anything secretive between us - just the desire to assist the search for Madeleine," they said in a joint statement, released by the McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell.
"From day one, the police in Portugal told us not to discuss our statements.
"It is incredibly frustrating for us that the fact we have done as we were asked to by the Portuguese police is still being looked upon as suspicious.
"Everything we have done, and continue to do, has been to help with the search for Madeleine and to end this nightmare for Gerry and Kate."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1567702/Madeleine-McCann-Friends-deny-silence-pact.html

23rd September 2007
He has complained that while fellow officers were leaking information illegally — Portugal has strict secrecy laws — the same officers would instruct him to deny the stories when printed. The problem for Sousa was that the denials rarely got into the media.

The result has been endless column inches slandering the McCanns.
''Some Portuguese journalists were fairly convinced the so-called evidence passed on to them by police was nowhere near as concrete as their sources suggested," says Jose Lugios, a freelance reporter based in the Algarve.

"The way it works here is that we can't get official police comments so we have to rely on tip-offs from them.
We know they use us at times?…?as they did when they drip-fed us snippets that might exert enough pressure on the McCanns to confess.

But that's the strange way it works. It's the only way we can get crime stories."

Such lax practice has shocked even the country's politicians.
''The leaks to the press of some details that are supposed to be classified have been used as an easy way to manipulate and shape public opinion," says Francisco Louçã, leader of a Portuguese opposition party.

''It is clear the leaks have been used in a battle to turn public opinion against the McCanns and convince people they are guilty when there is no concrete evidence to support this," said another politician, who asked to remain anonymous.

For months the McCanns have been angered by snide suggestions that their PR machine, dubbed Team McCann — a term they hate — is too slick.

The truth is that it has not been, until now.

In Praia da Luz it was little more than a borrowed fax, two mobile telephones and Gerry McCann's Apple laptop. And while friends and family in the UK did what they could, in Portugal the McCanns had only one official spokesman, provided and paid for initially by the Foreign Office.

Last week that became a six-strong team, top-heavy on legal experts and media representatives.

That transformation was borne of necessity.

Not least because Mr Sousa's observation is nearer to the truth than he may know. What began as a tale of heartbreaking loss has become a fierce propaganda battle, punctuated by smears and in-fighting.

For an increasingly embittered Portuguese police force, to lose such a battle would mean world-wide ridicule, allegations that they have attempted to "fit up" an innocent mother and accusations from a £2.8 billion tourism industry that they were ruining the Algarve's reputation.

Yesterday there was additional embarrassment when it emerged unofficially that Robert Murat, the only other suspect in the case, is unlikely to face charges.

But the greater tragedy is that Madeleine's fate – to her parents' anguish – appears to have been forgotten.

Instead the propaganda war has led to lurid headlines such as "The DNA found in the McCanns' rented Renault Scenic, is 100 per cent positively that of Madeleine" and "McCanns killed Maddie with an accidental overdose of sedative".
Kate has been attacked as an unfit mother, who could not cope with her three toddlers and resented bearing the bulk of the child care; she had "lost control" in police interviews — proof, Portuguese officers concluded, that she was capable of having harmed her child; the sniffer dogs "reacted wildly to the scent of death" in the McCanns' car.

Then, on Friday, came the allegation that there were six hours of Madeleine's life unaccounted for on the afternoon of her disappearance. It was an accusation swiftly denied by Kate McCann's friends, who have consistently substantiated the family's version of events.

"The Portimão police were definitely furious that they were depicted as bumbling and ineffectual," confirms a Portuguese officer from another force.

"They were especially furious about stories of their long, drunken lunches and their alleged willingness to force a confession to cover their ineffectual investigations.

They know they made mistakes – a whole catalogue – from failing to secure the crime scene, to leaving the border with Spain open for a further twelve hours after Madeleine vanished, to returning the hire car to the McCanns despite having allegedly found incriminating evidence inside.

But their own press would never write critically of them – they need to keep the relationship sweet.
It was a slap in the face and a shock when the British press not only branded them inept but heaped ridicule upon them, too."

Chief Inspector Sousa could only look on in despair. He knew that these leaks were long on exaggeration.

Then came the McCann retaliation which, Mr Sousa must have known, would be brisk, logical and based on sound facts.
Possibly unnerved by a recent British newspaper poll which revealed that only 20 per cent of the public considered them utterly innocent, and that almost half thought they could have been involved in their daughter's death, the couple's response was swift.
Within hours of an announcement by the Portuguese attorney general that local police had not gathered enough evidence yet to press charges against them, the McCanns had re-hired Clarence Mitchell, a former BBC reporter who had originally been assigned to them by the Foreign Office.
Mitchell, canny, erudite and well versed in media hardball — whose salary, it is believed, is being covered by Brian Kennedy, the millionaire owner of Sale Sharks rugby club — turned the couple from victims to combatants.

He succinctly rebuffed the flimsy evidence against them, telling the Portuguese authorities to "put up or shut up".
Perhaps more significantly, the couple also swiftly assembled a world-class team of lawyers
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1563938/Madeleine-McCann-police-chief-breaks-silence.html

"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #110 on: August 06, 2017, 05:15:47 PM »
Chief Inspector Olegário Sousa said? We don't know what he said because he isn't quoted as saying anything, despite the headline. In fact the story confirms it;

"In public he has said nothing."

Privately, apparently, he confided in;

"a tight trio of trusted colleagues"

Did these 'trusted colleagues' immediately seek out a UK newspaper in order to betray their friend? The article doesn't have any named sources so it's difficult to judge.

Unsupported rumours imo.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #111 on: August 06, 2017, 07:44:51 PM »
Chief Inspector Olegário Sousa said? We don't know what he said because he isn't quoted as saying anything, despite the headline. In fact the story confirms it;

"In public he has said nothing."

Privately, apparently, he confided in;

"a tight trio of trusted colleagues"

Did these 'trusted colleagues' immediately seek out a UK newspaper in order to betray their friend? The article doesn't have any named sources so it's difficult to judge.

Unsupported rumours imo.

Please note I deliberately missed out what Chief Inspector Olegário Sousa had to say on the matter ... for the simple reason that the quotes were using friends as a vehicle.

One notes that Chief Inspector Olegário Sousa did not voice any objection to what his friends said on his behalf;  very telling one would have thought.

The quote I cut and pasted is from the horse's mouth ... a journalist who made his living from police 'assistance' via leaks in criminal cases.

Snip
''Some Portuguese journalists were fairly convinced the so-called evidence passed on to them by police was nowhere near as concrete as their sources suggested," says Jose Lugios, a freelance reporter based in the Algarve.

"The way it works here is that we can't get official police comments so we have to rely on tip-offs from them.
We know they use us at times?…?as they did when they drip-fed us snippets that might exert enough pressure on the McCanns to confess.

But that's the strange way it works. It's the only way we can get crime stories."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1563938/Madeleine-McCann-police-chief-breaks-silence.html

Confirmation of what the Chief Inspector's friends told the press on his behalf?

However one does not require to rely on unattributed quotes from the Portuguese police to get a fair idea of the way in which the McCanns were disadvantaged when we have attributed quotes made under oath by a senior British police officer.


Leveson inquiry: ex-police chief defends not preventing false McCann DNA reports

Snip
The UK police were right not to "put the record straight" over false reports claiming Gerry and Kate McCann were implicated in their daughter's disappearance, the Leveson inquiry has heard.

Matthew Baggott, the former chief constable of Leicestershire police, told the inquiry on Wednesday he could not have released information about DNA tests conducted in the UK to counter leaks by the Portuguese police that falsely claimed they showed the McCanns had hidden Madeleine in the boot of a hire car in Portugal.

Baggott said there were both legal and professional reasons for this. Portuguese secrecy laws made it "utterly wrong to have somehow, in an off-the-record way, have breached what was a very clear legal requirement upon the Portuguese themselves", he told Lord Justice Leveson.

He also said the Leicestershire force's priority was to maintain a positive relationship with the Portuguese police, with a view to "eventually ... resolving what happened to that poor child".
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/mar/28/leveson-madeleine-mccann-dna-police

Therefore it is no "unsupported rumour" that the Portuguese police were releasing inaccurate information about Madeleine McCann's parents.

If you can think of one morally defensible reason why some consider that fine, it would be interesting to hear it.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #112 on: August 06, 2017, 09:44:45 PM »
Were the PJ accused by Leveson of leaking false information to the press or was that just the Guardian's opinion?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline misty

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #113 on: August 06, 2017, 10:10:58 PM »
Were the PJ accused by Leveson of leaking false information to the press or was that just the Guardian's opinion?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-482007/Lies-beatings-secret-trials-dark-police-handling-Madeleine-case.html#ixzz0UzGpRERF

Worth a read for details about what was going on with the press at the time.

Offline Brietta

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #114 on: August 07, 2017, 01:53:01 AM »
Were the PJ accused by Leveson of leaking false information to the press or was that just the Guardian's opinion?

Why on earth do you think Leveson would comment on the Policia Judiciaria media onslaught conducted against Madeleine's parents?

He was not a witness.

The witness was the former chief constable of Leicestershire police, Mathew Baggott.

His sworn evidence to the inquiry revealed that "leaks by the Portuguese police" ... "falsely claimed ~ the McCanns had hidden Madeleine in the boot of a hire car in Portugal."

The Guardian merely reported on the evidence presented to the inquiry ...
(a) the Policia Judiciaria leaked pejorative information to the Portuguese press
(b) the highly damaging information given to the Portuguese press was false

Former chief constable Baggott was aware of Portuguese Secrecy Laws and was mindful of them when considering the need for cooperation with the Portuguese on Madeleine's behalf.
Thus he reconciled himself to the knowledge the PJ were using the press to damage the reputations of Madeleine's parents while his own inaction allowed them further suffering.
The leak referred to was around the time of the 100% Madeleine's DNA headlines ... so nothing too trivial.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #115 on: August 07, 2017, 08:51:26 AM »
It seems it was Jerry Lawton of The Daily Star who mentioned leaks by the PJ. He knew it was true because his Portuguese media colleagues told him so.  8**8:/:

If the Portuguese press were shown the evidence by the PJ why did they get the details wrong? The press reports do not match what is in the police files.

I've been told by my colleagues in the Portuguese media that the leaks weren't a case of spurious gossip. Portuguese reporters were shown extracts of police files, hence the detail in some the leaks, which of course subsequently it's turned out to be in the police files.
http://leveson.sayit.mysociety.org/hearing-19-march-2012/mr-jeremy-lawton

Martin Brunt reported on the matter too. He said there were three interesting results. A full match to Madeleine's DNA was found on the window sill of 5A, a full match and a partial match in their hire car.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3HQ74Rfdbk

You will search the police files in vain to find anything supporting what Brunt said.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #116 on: August 07, 2017, 11:10:07 AM »
It's quite strange when some people use unsubstantiated press reports to prove others were talking to the press.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Brietta

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #117 on: August 07, 2017, 11:11:11 AM »
It seems it was Jerry Lawton of The Daily Star who mentioned leaks by the PJ. He knew it was true because his Portuguese media colleagues told him so.  8**8:/:

If the Portuguese press were shown the evidence by the PJ why did they get the details wrong? The press reports do not match what is in the police files.

I've been told by my colleagues in the Portuguese media that the leaks weren't a case of spurious gossip. Portuguese reporters were shown extracts of police files, hence the detail in some the leaks, which of course subsequently it's turned out to be in the police files.
http://leveson.sayit.mysociety.org/hearing-19-march-2012/mr-jeremy-lawton

Martin Brunt reported on the matter too. He said there were three interesting results. A full match to Madeleine's DNA was found on the window sill of 5A, a full match and a partial match in their hire car.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3HQ74Rfdbk

You will search the police files in vain to find anything supporting what Brunt said.

At last you are getting there.

The actualité of the situation is that many of the leaks given to the press were at best misunderstandings or at worse total pejorative fabrication.

What do you think the information given out contrary to Portuguese secrecy laws was intended to do ...
pay for the source's next family holiday?
assist in any way possible in the search for Madeleine McCann?
or to soften up public opinion while putting pressure on the targets of the opprobrium thus directed at them - namely Madeleine's parents?

Journalists took what was fed to them by 'a source close to the investigation' ... it didn't have to be accurate and in many cases it wasn't ... and that is the whole point.

The winners of this propaganda war were those in the Policia Judiciaria releasing the propaganda and those in the media selling it to an eager public.

The big loser was the missing child whose case was sidetracked by it all ... Madeleine McCann.   
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #118 on: August 07, 2017, 11:12:49 AM »
It's quite strange when some people use unsubstantiated press reports to prove others were talking to the press.

If your comment is directed at me ... have the courtesy to put up or shut up.  Thank you.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy law and its impact on the Madeleine case.
« Reply #119 on: August 07, 2017, 12:46:13 PM »
At last you are getting there.

The actualité of the situation is that many of the leaks given to the press were at best misunderstandings or at worse total pejorative fabrication.

What do you think the information given out contrary to Portuguese secrecy laws was intended to do ...
pay for the source's next family holiday?
assist in any way possible in the search for Madeleine McCann?
or to soften up public opinion while putting pressure on the targets of the opprobrium thus directed at them - namely Madeleine's parents?

Journalists took what was fed to them by 'a source close to the investigation' ... it didn't have to be accurate and in many cases it wasn't ... and that is the whole point.

The winners of this propaganda war were those in the Policia Judiciaria releasing the propaganda and those in the media selling it to an eager public.

The big loser was the missing child whose case was sidetracked by it all ... Madeleine McCann.

Getting where? I have seen nothing which proves that the PJ leaked. All I have seen is reporters (both Portuguese and UK) trying to justify their speculative stories by blaming the PJ.

I find it quite mind boggling to suggest that the PJ leaked inaccurate information in an attempt to harm the McCann's reputation. That suggests that the PJ knowingly harmed their own reputation by leaking such untrue 'facts' as reported below;

Portuguese newspaper Diario de Noticias, citing informed investigation sources, said the couple had both admitted to giving Madeleine and their other two children a sedative on the night she vanished.
Belfast Telegraph 10 September 2007

The statements and evidence which have been gathered by Portuguese Police over the last 132 days is colossal, amounting to thousands of pages.
 
But they contain not just the much-discussed forensic reports of blood stains and other material but also, Channel 4 News understands, transcripts of recorded phone conversations the McCanns have had with others over many weeks. There is also evidence from emails they have sent and received.
Channel 4 news 10/9/2007

Police have claimed that forensic tests have found three DNA matches to the missing girl.
 
One came from the window sill of the family's holiday apartment in Praia da Luz and two from the Renault Scenic car the McCanns hired 25 days after the girl disappeared.
Metro 11/9/2007

Police are said to have been bugging the McCanns' phones and intercepting their emails for weeks. Reports in the Portuguese press have suggested that some of their conversations may have contradicted statements they gave to police. One newspaper suggested that the phone taps had helped satisfy police that the couple believed their daughter was dead.
Telegraph 12/9/2007

French investigative reporter Guilhem Battut said a report outlining how the four-year-old met her death was already with Portuguese prosecutors.

The newspaper France Soir said it contains scientific analysis of the bodily fluids found in the boot of the car hired by Kate and Gerry McCann which "prove that the little girl had ingested medicines, without doubt sleeping pills, in large quantities".

A source at the newspaper said 'We are not simply repeating rumours carried in other papers.

"This is not a theory, but a fact contained in hard evidence in the hands of the Portuguese authorities.
Mail 14/9/2007
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id109.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0