UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Disappeared and Abducted Children and Young Adults => Madeleine McCann (3) disappeared from her parent's holiday apartment at Ocean Club, Praia da Luz, Portugal on 3 May 2007. No trace of her has ever been found. => Topic started by: Angelo222 on September 03, 2021, 03:03:15 PM
-
I for one fear that the mystery surrounding the disappearance of Madeleine McCann will never be solved. Too much time has passed, too many people have since died, too little real investigation was carried out in the first few years following the incident and too many have a vested interest in this case for the truth to ever be revealed.
Now prove me wrong.
-
I for one fear that the mystery surrounding the disappearance of Madeleine McCann will never be solved. Too much time has passed, too many people have since died, too little real investigation was carried out in the first few years following the incident and too many have a vested interest in this case for the truth to ever be revealed.
Now prove me wrong.
That I do agree with. Too many establishment figures who would lose face if the truth became public knowledge. IMO
-
That I do agree with. Too many establishment figures who would lose face if the truth became public knowledge. IMO
ooh a juicy conspiracy fer sure!
-
I for one fear that the mystery surrounding the disappearance of Madeleine McCann will never be solved. Too much time has passed, too many people have since died, too little real investigation was carried out in the first few years following the incident and too many have a vested interest in this case for the truth to ever be revealed.
Now prove me wrong.
I think you will be proved wrong. From what Wolters says he knows exactly how Mddie died...in that sense it is solved
-
I think you will be proved wrong. From what Wolters says he knows exactly how Mddie died...in that sense it is solved
Yes he knows exactly how she died, hence the reason he said she could be alive.
-
Yes he knows exactly how she died, hence the reason he said she could be alive.
If you actually knew what he said you would understand that apparrent contradiction.....
-
If you actually knew what he said you would understand that apparrent contradiction.....
He said there's no forensic evidence & it may be theoretically possible she's alive.
“We don’t want to kill the hope and because there is no forensic evidence it may be theoretically possible."
How do you square 'knowing exactly how she died' with there being a possibility she's alive?
It would make sense if it was a 'belief', but according to you it's certainty.
-
He said there's no forensic evidence & it may be theoretically possible she's alive.
“We don’t want to kill the hope and because there is no forensic evidence it may be theoretically possible."
How do you square 'knowing exactly how she died' with there being a possibility she's alive?
It would make sense if it was a 'belief', but according to you it's certainty.
Knowing exactly would suggest an autopsy, mighty hard without a body.
-
I for one fear that the mystery surrounding the disappearance of Madeleine McCann will never be solved. Too much time has passed, too many people have since died, too little real investigation was carried out in the first few years following the incident and too many have a vested interest in this case for the truth to ever be revealed.
Now prove me wrong.
I've long said it'll remain person/s unknown removed Madeleine from 5a without leaving a trace to her whereabouts, I've seen nothing to change my mind on that.
-
Knowing exactly would suggest an autopsy, mighty hard without a body.
Perhaps it's all on film, like some snuff movie.
'Course if that were the case, then they would have told the parents - which they may have. How would we know ?
-
Perhaps it's all on film, like some snuff movie.
Who identified said child, no one cause there ain't one.
-
He said there's no forensic evidence & it may be theoretically possible she's alive.
“We don’t want to kill the hope and because there is no forensic evidence it may be theoretically possible."
How do you square 'knowing exactly how she died' with there being a possibility she's alive?
It would make sense if it was a 'belief', but according to you it's certainty.
Have you not heard him explain.. It makes perfect sense
-
Have ypu not heard him explain.. It makes perfect sense
For those of us who don't understand, how about explaining how & why it makes perfect sense ?
-
For those of us who don't understand, how about explaining how & why it makes perfect sense ?
If you had listened to what Wolters has said you would understand..... If you havent then you are not really informed enough to criticise him...this is a general statement not directed solely at you
-
If you had listened to what Wolters has said you would understand..... If you havent then you are not really informed enough to criticise him...this is a general statement not directed solely at you
So no explanation - bullshit as usual
-
So no explanation - bullshit as usual
Im so glad I followed my instincts and didnt bother
-
Im so glad I followed my instincts and didnt bother
You never do. The concept of explanation is totally alien to you.
-
You never do. The concept of explanation is totally alien to you.
Whatever.. Im obviously not really bothered
-
Yes he knows exactly how she died, hence the reason he said she could be alive.
But he didnt say... She could be alive..
He said... Theoretically.. She could be alive
Theres a big difference... Perhaps you think they are the same
-
But if Wolter knew she was dead, he wouldn't say she might theoretically she might be alive, therefore he doesn't know.
-
But he didnt say... She could be alive..
He said... Theoretically.. She could be alive
Theres a big difference... Perhaps you think they are the same
Then he doesn't know exactly how she died.
-
Then he doesn't know exactly how she died.
Or even if she is dead - although she almost certainly is.
-
Wolted originally said Maddie was dead.... He then accepted he didnt have absolute 100% proof of death but what evidence they had would show death almost certainly followed.
Exactly the same as Rui Pedro. There is no absolute proof of his death but it can be assumed he died after the abuse he was subjected too
-
But he didnt say... She could be alive..
He said... Theoretically.. She could be alive
Theres a big difference... Perhaps you think they are the same
I disagree dear Dave. If one knows for sure how someone died. then it is impossible that said person can still be "theoretically" alive.
-
I disagree dear Dave. If one knows for sure how someone died. then it is impossible that said person can still be "theoretically" alive.
I presume you are not familiar with the Rui Pedro case.. A child sbducted in Portugal. Assumed to be dead after photographic evidence of his abuse was found.
-
I presume you are not familiar with the Rui Pedro case.. A child sbducted in Portugal. Assumed to be dead after photographic evidence of his abuse was found.
Nothing to say Wolters has anything of the sort,save in the conspiracy minds.
-
I presume you are not familiar with the Rui Pedro case.. A child sbducted in Portugal. Assumed to be dead after photographic evidence of his abuse was found.
Do they know exactly how he died?
-
Nothing to say Wolters has anything of the sort,save in the conspiracy minds.
He has actually mentioned photographic evidence as being a possibility... And several other pointers ive already pointed out
-
Do they know exactly how he died?
Google the facts
-
Google the facts
So that's a no then.
-
I disagree dear Dave. If one knows for sure how someone died. then it is impossible that said person can still be "theoretically" alive.
Wolters has found Brueckner's video of Maddie being shot point blank in the temple then bleeding out.
But obviously without forensic evidence there's a chance she could be alive.
-
So that's a no then.
Its a
.
Ive posted the facts of the Rui Pedro case many times.. Im not bothered if you cant see the similarities
-
Its a
.
Ive posted the facts of the Rui Pedro case many times.. Im not bothered if you cant see the similarities
Good because there aren't any.
-
Wolters has found Brueckner's video of Maddie being shot point blank in the temple then bleeding out.
But obviously without forensic evidence there's a chance she could be alive.
One of your better posts
-
Good because there aren't any.
In yor opinion... Imo there are
-
One of your better posts
Yes because many people survive bullets to the head without immediate medical treatment.
-
In yor opinion... Imo there are
I've been looking for Rui Pedro's cause of death & can't find it anywhere.
You seem to know, so how 'exactly' did he die?
-
Yes because many people survive bullets to the head without immediate medical treatment.
No one said "many people survive bullets to the head without immediate medical treatment", however theoretically it is possible to survive a bullet to the head. Like it's possible to survive a 100ft fall off a building.
-
No one said "many people survive bullets to the head without immediate medical treatment", however theoretically it is possible to survive a bullet to the head. Like it's possible to survive a 100ft fall off a building.
If Wolters has the evidence which apparently shows Madeleine being killed. He should tell the parents immediately, and probably charge his suspect. This has been going on for over a year!! It's grossly unfair to her family not to disclose the information to them, if indeed it is a fact. This drawn out public insinuation must be, if true, torturing Madeleine's family.