UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Disappeared and Abducted Children and Young Adults => Madeleine McCann (3) disappeared from her parent's holiday apartment at Ocean Club, Praia da Luz, Portugal on 3 May 2007. No trace of her has ever been found. => Topic started by: carlymichelle on September 22, 2013, 11:54:59 AM
-
will kates description of their sister traumatise them as well? i would imagine so most normal people thought that page was very disturbing
-
129 isn't it? I am going from memory though.
-
129 isn't it? I am going from memory though.
either page number you know what im reffering too and imo it was very disturbing the twins would find that more disturbing then GA book considering as far as i know the twins cant read portugese
-
I'm a bit worried about what kind of respect for authority the twins will grow up with based on their fragrant mother's use of language describing Portuguese policemen... ;-)
-
I'm a bit worried about what kind of respect for authority the twins will grow up with based on their fragrant mother's use of language describing Portuguese policemen... ;-)
or the monster who took maddie.............. the mcanns told the twins that a monster took maddie and they were only 2.....
-
or the monster who took maddie.............. the mcanns told the twins that a monster took maddie and they were only 2.....
Have Kate and Gerry McCann ever done you any harm, carlymichelle?
-
or the monster who took maddie.............. the mcanns told the twins that a monster took maddie and they were only 2.....
No they didn't!
-
or the monster who took maddie.............. the mcanns told the twins that a monster took maddie and they were only 2.....
Please show us some evidence that what you are claiming actually happened. I have seen this comment before but never seen anything to prove it happened.
-
Please show us some evidence that what you are claiming actually happened. I have seen this comment before but never seen anything to prove it happened.
The McCann's didn't tell the twins that a monster took maddie, Carly's doing her thing again.
McCann twins play ‘find Maddie’
By metrowebukmetro Sunday 27 Jan 2008 10:35 pm
The brother and sister of missing Madeleine McCann cope with their loss by playing a game called ‘Find the monster that took Maddie’, it was claimed on Sunday.
The game was described by leading world sex crimes expert Ray Wyre after he met parents Kate and Gerry McCann.
Twins Sean and Amelie, two, were helping to give their parents the strength to carry on, he added.
The parents told him they were together recently when the twins rushed into the room shouting.
He added: ‘They said they were going to go and find the monster that took Maddie. Then they dashed off to play the game. It’s a sad story, but it is healthy that Madeleine remains a real presence in their lives.’
A spokesman for the McCanns denied the story.
Maddie vanished in Portugal last May, aged three.
http://metro.co.uk/2008/01/27/mccann-twins-play-find-maddie-87246/
-
The McCann's didn't tell the twins that a monster took maddie, Carly's doing her thing again.
McCann twins play ‘find Maddie’
By metrowebukmetro Sunday 27 Jan 2008 10:35 pm
The brother and sister of missing Madeleine McCann cope with their loss by playing a game called ‘Find the monster that took Maddie’, it was claimed on Sunday.
The game was described by leading world sex crimes expert Ray Wyre after he met parents Kate and Gerry McCann.
Twins Sean and Amelie, two, were helping to give their parents the strength to carry on, he added.
The parents told him they were together recently when the twins rushed into the room shouting.
He added: ‘They said they were going to go and find the monster that took Maddie. Then they dashed off to play the game. It’s a sad story, but it is healthy that Madeleine remains a real presence in their lives.’
A spokesman for the McCanns denied the story.
Maddie vanished in Portugal last May, aged three.
http://metro.co.uk/2008/01/27/mccann-twins-play-find-maddie-87246/
So...
a) this is the age-old tactic of "report all the details in their salubrious glory" and then post a footnote denying it so the feeble-minded can subsequently claim "they never said that!" and
b) the twins, like obviously right, came up with that term all by themselves at that age without any involvement of the parents.
It amazes me that some of you can tie your own shoelaces. Assuming you can, of course.
-
or the monster who took maddie.............. the mcanns told the twins that a monster took maddie and they were only 2.....
you really shouldnt posts lies carly .do you know what libel means
ETA I really dont know what this thread has to do with anything ..everyone knows whats in kates book well those who have read it ..you are sick minded bringing page 129 up ....its been discussed over and over why do you feel the need to discuss it again ?
-
you really shouldnt posts lies carly .do you know what libel means
ETA I really dont know what this thread has to do with anything ..everyone knows whats in kates book well those who have read it ..you are sick minded bringing page 129 up ....its been discussed over and over why do you feel the need to duscuss it again ?
...as sick-minded as the person who wrote it, perhaps? No, obviously not.
-
...as sick-minded as the person who wrote it, perhaps? No, obviously not.
it was kates thoughts anyone that thought a pedo had took their child would think the same imo..but why keep mulling over something so sensitive no need to bring it up what point is carly trying to make is beyond me.
-
it was kates thoughts anyone that thought a pedo had took their child would think the same imo..but why keep mulling over something so sensitive no need to bring it up what point is carly trying to make is beyond me.
In that case you're intellectually challenged. The point is that the McCanns are taking someone to court over a complex book laying out the conclusions of the investigating force and yet they are failing to look at the fouling of their own back yard in such literature as exists on p. 129 and carlymichelle is quite rightly drawing a juxtaposition between this outwardly contradictory stance.
-
In that case you're intellectually challenged. The point is that the McCanns are taking someone to court over a complex book laying out the conclusions of the investigating force and yet they are failing to look at the fouling of their own back yard in such literature as exists on p. 129 and carlymichelle is quite rightly drawing a juxtaposition between this outwardly contradictory stance.
There is nothing contradictory about the two positions. On the one hand Kate McCann admitted her worst fears about what may have happened. On the other hand a disgraced ex-cop is being brought to task over potential libel and lies about a missing child.
The positions are in no way related, no matter how hard you attempt to convince readers that they are.
It is a completely illogical stance that you are taking and that suggests that is you who may be intellectually challenged as logic is a fundamental aspect of intelligence.
-
There is nothing contradictory about the two positions. On the one hand Kate McCann admitted her worst fears about what may have happened. On the other hand a disgraced ex-cop is being brought to task over potential libel and lies about a missing child.
The positions are in no way related, no matter how hard you attempt to convince readers that they are.
It is a completely illogical stance that you are taking and that suggests that is you who may be intellectually challenged as logic is a fundamental aspect of intelligence.
For the avoidance of doubt I acknowledge I have read your post. I have no comment to make because there is nothing else I need to add.
-
the mcanns fear what the twins think about Ga BOOK what about page 128
What does Amaral say on page 128 of his book?
-
the mcanns fear what the twins think about Ga BOOK what about page 128
What does Amaral say on page 128 of his book?
was mistaken i was reffering to kates book 129 i wont go into details but most ubiased people were disgusted by it
-
was mistaken i was reffering to kates book 129 i wont go into details but most ubiased people were disgusted by it
What was she thinking to put such a thing in print?
-
What was she thinking to put such a thing in print?
[/quote
would most mothers write something like that about their little girl??
-
There is nothing contradictory about the two positions. On the one hand Kate McCann admitted her worst fears about what may have happened. On the other hand a disgraced ex-cop is being brought to task over potential libel and lies about a missing child.
The positions are in no way related, no matter how hard you attempt to convince readers that they are.
It is a completely illogical stance that you are taking and that suggests that is you who may be intellectually challenged as logic is a fundamental aspect of intelligence.
For the avoidance of doubt I acknowledge I have read your post. I have no comment to make because there is nothing else I need to add.
So you cannot respond to my demonstrating that your stance is illogical.
Understood.
-
What was she thinking to put such a thing in print?
How reducing that was. This is was shocked people, Madeleine was described as an object, she wasn't considered as an individual, i.e what can't be divided without being destroyed.
-
How many pages did KMs book have? Makes me cringe the strange obsession people have with that particular page.
Personally I wouldn't have included it, but then I am not a distraught mother who is letting all sorts of evils run rampant through my mind as to what could be happening to my missing little daughter.
It must have been a difficult book to write and I assume that Kate McCann was being open and honest about how she was feeling.
-
How many pages did KMs book have? Makes me cringe the strange obsession people have with that particular page.
Personally I wouldn't have included it, but then I am not a distraught mother who is letting all sorts of evils run rampant through my mind as to what could be happening to my missing little daughter.
It must have been a difficult book to write and I assume that Kate McCann was being open and honest about how she was feeling.
I agree absolutely with you.
The emphasis by people on this one line on one page from the book is most cringeworthy and frankly worrying. Do they not actually realise that honesty was the aim? Do they not realise that the despair and dark thoughts of the parent of a missing child are going to be as depressing and blunt as this?
I am pretty sure that I would not have included it either but that does not explain why so many people are so fascinated by this phrase.
-
I find it quite sickening the obsession with it.
As for Honesty well we know how that works or doesn't with the usual suspects.
-
was mistaken i was reffering to kates book 129 i wont go into details but most ubiased people were disgusted by it
"Most people" strikes again. Who are most people?
-
"Most people" strikes again. Who are most people?
e.g. Have you read the yahoo pages comments on this trial ?
Please don't come back with the cliche that the people there are unrepresentative.
It really doesn't wash.
-
e.g. Have you read the yahoo pages comments on this trial ?
Please don't come back with the cliche that the people there are unrepresentative.
It really doesn't wash.
What percentage of the world population does that represent, Stephen? Around 0.000001% perhaps?