UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Disappeared and Abducted Children and Young Adults => Madeleine McCann (3) disappeared from her parent's holiday apartment at Ocean Club, Praia da Luz, Portugal on 3 May 2007. No trace of her has ever been found. => Topic started by: lizzibif. on October 27, 2013, 11:40:52 AM
-
Sorry for starting this thread but!
Where is Madeleine when all the bitching and biting is going on about her
Parents you are forgetting one important person in the midst of it a missing child
{ MADELEINE McCANN}
Still missing still findable still being looked for.
-
People are wondering why if finding Maddie was so important information was suppressed for 5 years.
-
People are wondering why if finding Maddie was so important information was suppressed for 5 years.
Yes, they've turned into yet another way to stick the knife in, haven't they?
-
Sorry for starting this thread but!
Where is Madeleine when all the bitching and biting is going on about her
Parents you are forgetting one important person in the midst of it a missing child
{ MADELEINE McCANN}
Still missing still findable still being looked for.
I believe that Madeleine McCann is at the forefront of every posters minds on this forum, whether a 'pro' or an 'anti'. Questioning why important information that might find her has been suppressed is very much about Madeleine and not her parents. If it had been someone else suppressing the information, I'm sure everyone would be equally shocked.
-
What people are saying in here is not important.
What is important is that the police investigation in Portugal and UK are ongoing and are active and open.
The both police forces have much more information that the people in here.. what is happening here is just 'beating around the bush'.. no one in here has the real picture of the real situation..
-
What people are saying in here is not important.
What is important is that the police investigation in Portugal and UK are ongoing and are active and open.
The both police forces have much more information that the people in here.. what is happening here is just 'beating around the bush'.. no one in here has the real picture of the real situation..
Seeya then.
-
What people are saying in here is not important.
What is important is that the police investigation in Portugal and UK are ongoing and are active and open.
The both police forces have much more information that the people in here.. what is happening here is just 'beating around the bush'.. no one in here has the real picture of the real situation..
This is absolutely correct. No one here, from either side, has the full picture. All we know is that the police forces of both the UK and Portugal are actively investigating this abduction, and neither force considers the McCanns as suspects.
-
This is absolutely correct. No one here, from either side, has the full picture. All we know is that the police forces of both the UK and Portugal are actively investigating this abduction, and neither force considers the McCanns as suspects.
They don't even know for sure what the crime is yet so expecting them to name suspects is a bit optimistic don't you think?
-
They don't even know for sure what the crime is yet so expecting them to name suspects is a bit optimistic don't you think?
They do know what the crime is - abduction - and of course they don't know yet who the abductor/s is/are, but both forces have stated that the McCanns are not suspects.
-
Scotland Yard, at least, have stated quite clearly that the crime they are investigating is abduction by a stranger.
-
Scotland Yard, at least, have stated quite clearly that the crime they are investigating is abduction by a stranger.
Doesn't mean it's the correct 'thesis'.
-
Doesn't mean it's the correct 'thesis'.
do you think the mcanns and supporters are in damage mode today? that was a huge bombshell yesterday for them and IMO it will affect the verdict with GA
-
do you think the mcanns and supporters are in damage mode today? that was a huge bombshell yesterday for them and IMO it will affect the verdict with GA
Yes they are.
Expect some form of counter attack, and/or of course another 'sighting'.
-
Yes they are.
Expect some form of counter attack, and/or of course another 'sighting'.
Counter attack?
Is this a game? A missing child and an investigation into finding her and you are talking tit for tat?
The reality is a child is missing.
-
Counter attack?
Is this a game? A missing child and an investigation into finding her and you are talking tit for tat?
The reality is a child is missing.
And yet information that could have helped to find her was suppressed for 5 years! Doesn't that raise questions for you?
-
And yet information that could have helped to find her was suppressed for 5 years! Doesn't that raise questions for you?
So the Times says, other papers this morning are reporting that the information was with the police. Choose your portal of truth.
My point remains the same, it's being viewed as a game, a team sport and that is revolting.
-
So the Times says, other papers this morning are reporting that the information was with the police. Choose your portal of truth.
My point remains the same, it's being viewed as a game, a team sport and that is revolting.
No matter who had the information and suppressed it, the parents, the PJ, sy or all of the above. Doesn't make you question exactly how hard this child was being looked for?
I personally think that she's beyond our help and has been for a long time, for more than five years, but everybody who has said that they are looking for a live child, how can they balance that with not releasing information that could be pertinent to the case?
-
No matter who had the information and suppressed it, the parents, the PJ, sy or all of the above. Doesn't make you question exactly how hard this child was being looked for?
I personally think that she's beyond our help and has been for a long time, for more than five years, but everybody who has said that they are looking for a live child, how can they balance that with not releasing information that could be pertinent to the case?
I personally hope for the best until the worst is established. If information was passed to the relevant authorities then no, it doesn't make me question how hard she is being looked for.
Again, the relegating this issue into a game is revolting.
-
Scotland Yard, at least, have stated quite clearly that the crime they are investigating is abduction by a stranger.
They might well be investigating an abduction but there is no evidence it ever took place. For all anyone knows Madeleine could have wandered out into the street and fallen down a storm drain.
As far as the conflicting stories in the Press are concerned ask yourself this question. If it were your child and two e-fits had been produced which collectively offered a reasonable chance of finding her - Would You Suppress Them?
...or as I suspect would you be shouting it out from the rooftops?
-
They might well be investigating an abduction but there is no evidence it ever took place. For all anyone knows Madeleine could have wandered out into the street and fallen down a storm drain.
As far as the conflicting stories in the Press are concerned ask yourself this question. If it were your child and two e-fits had been produced which collectively offered a reasonable chance of finding her - Would You Suppress Them?
...or as I suspect would you be shouting it out from the rooftops?
8@??)(
That would be the logical thing to do, unless of course you were trying to hide something.
-
They might well be investigating an abduction but there is no evidence it ever took place. For all anyone knows Madeleine could have wandered out into the street and fallen down a storm drain.
As far as the conflicting stories in the Press are concerned ask yourself this question. If it were your child and two e-fits had been produced which collectively offered a reasonable chance of finding her - Would You Suppress Them?
...or as I suspect would you be shouting it out from the rooftops?
The first investigation was centred on the parents and there was no evidence found there, either, was there?
At the moment there are conflicting reports, John, and yet you reflexively jump on the "They did it" side again. I seriously doubt the Mccanns personally suppressed anything, it was too big for that. They continue to shout from the rooftops when and where they can. Why would they spend money, time and energy and suppress the very thing they want? This isn't some small matter, and it was always going to come out, and it has, albeit in conflicting reports.
-
They might well be investigating an abduction but there is no evidence it ever took place. For all anyone knows Madeleine could have wandered out into the street and fallen down a storm drain.
As far as the conflicting stories in the Press are concerned ask yourself this question. If it were your child and two e-fits had been produced which collectively offered a reasonable chance of finding her - Would You Suppress Them?
...or as I suspect would you be shouting it out from the rooftops?
"For all anyone knows Madeleine could have wandered out into the street and fallen down a storm drain."
No John,
Kate McCann: "Because I know. I was there, I found my daughter gone. I know more than you do. I know what I saw."
"I knew immediately she'd been taken."
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id301.html
-
I'm not saying they did anything Jazzy, I am simply trying to understand what has happened.
Those e-fits should have been distributed widely back in 2008 when there was a reasonable chance that she was still alive but for some unknown reason they weren't.
The question which will have to be answered now is who suppressed them and why?
-
The first investigation was centred on the parents and there was no evidence found there, either, was there?
At the moment there are conflicting reports, John, and yet you reflexively jump on the "They did it" side again. I seriously doubt the Mccanns personally suppressed anything, it was too big for that. They continue to shout from the rooftops when and where they can. Why would they spend money, time and energy and suppress the very thing they want? This isn't some small matter, and it was always going to come out, and it has, albeit in conflicting reports.
Who do you think suppressed it then, and why?
-
Who do you think suppressed it then, and why?
Maybe they did suppress it, maybe they did not.. we cannot claim anything right now with any level of certainty because we are not privy with information.
As we know from past, we cannot rely on paper reports either.
My view is: 'Lets trust the police forces working on this case'..