UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Other Forums and Organisations => Jeremy Bamber forum => Topic started by: scipio_usmc on July 07, 2014, 11:02:57 PM
-
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5566.15.html
In the above thread Grahame calls the post from the supposed newbie thought provoking.
However, in the past Grahame posted about how these unarmed police followed standard procedure and the armed personnel did as well and that any suggestion they should have immediately entered the premises is wrong.
Grahame doesn't bother to challenge the claims of the pro Jeremy newbie though on the same grounds he was arguing with Adam and others. Grahame is not in the least bit consistent.
For that matter no one there effectively challenged him. Adam's responses are a mess tha tis why they like him there he is incompetent.
Why is it that not a single person called him out for his bogus claims that police were aware shots were fired? He bases the claim EXCLUSIVELY on the fact the unarmed personnel were scared to go inside. He makes the assumption that they had to know shots had already been fired or they would not have been scared to go inside.
First of all to know shots had been fired before they arrived would require someone telling them shots had been fired. Who could have done so let alone did do such? No one. The only person to summon them was Jeremy and he claimed his father said Sheila was armed. They were scared to go in not because they knew shots had already been fired but because they were told there was an armed person in the house threatening the other occupants. They wanted more details from Jeremy before they did anything so that was why they wanted to speak with him. After they did speak to him things got worse. He told them she had an arsenal at her disposal and was proficient with all the weapons.
Robertson's assumptions that police had to know shots were fired or they would have ran inside are unfounded assumptions easy to refute.
Instead of refuting them people like Grahame suggest it is very interesting and thought provoking while Adam does his usual worhtless dance instead of explicitly addressing the subject at hand.
Robertson claims that for years he has studied the first 2 hours of events but nothing else. That would mean no effort to actually study the murders in detail just the police actions the first 2 hours. That sounds pretty absurd and worthless but if true just means he made no serious inquiry of any value into the case. It also seems like many wasted years if all you can come up with is a stupid suggestion that they would have to have known shots had been fired or they would have went inside though they were unarmed and told there was a crazy woman with an arsenal inside.
When he escalated to blaming Stanley Jones then that brought out Caroline and Neil.
Caroline didn't bother to refute his part about them knowing shots had been fired but instead took the following tact:
"You seem to be suggesting that it was known by most (if not all) of the early responders that shots had been fired. This being the case, it would have been well known among all concerned that Jeremy was innocent - so why was this not communicated to the relatives? Why did no one mention anything about KNOWING Sheila was responsible during the whole time she was 'suspected' and the relatives were suspicious about Jeremy's involvement?"
Neil also chimed in that it would be extraordinary for Stan Jones to just frame Jeremy because of some instant dislike.
Matt chimed in about how not even Jeremy heard any shots fired.
But Robertson didn't say police heard shots fired he said they knew that shots had been fired before they arrived which by definition means they would not have been in a position to hear them. He said that their actions demonstrated they knew shots had been fired. He also attacked Bonnet in an unspecified manner. He has not fully laid out his claims but it seems like if he were challenged with my counter and pushed he would end up claiming Nevill let police know shots had been fired and that Bonnet later eliminated Nevill's call from the records.
-
There are so many basic flaws in Bill's theory, it actually made me snork when I read it! Although, he writes well enough. And no one takes Gladys seriously, that's why he is so 8()(((@#.
I still can't believe that forum got rid of you and Hartley, but kept Gladys and susan. 8-)(--)
-
Ditto: well written but many flaws. Poster seems to be implying that he's ex police? To my mind it has something of the Martin ring to it >@@(*&)
It deserves a second read which I'll do later when I have more time.
-
Grahame is full of crap! What a shocker! 8-)(--)
-
Ditto: well written but many flaws. Poster seems to be implying that he's ex police? To my mind it has something of the Martin ring to it >@@(*&)
It deserves a second read which I'll do later when I have more time.
He didn't say he was ex-police and I don't have any reason at all to believe that he is. in fact the things he says makes it clear to me there is no way was ever a cop. People suggested he is an ex-cop because he said he made the trip and they made the giant leap that he was speeding and would have to be a cop to speed. He simply didn't bother to correct their error so his deception is more subtle than to say he is an ex cop. His deception is not correcting them.
-
Grahame is full of crap! What a shocker! 8-)(--)
If I was not banned I would be throwing his posts back in his face asking him how come he inssited in the past he insisted police followed proper procedures and no way would they rush in but now suddenly he agrees they would have. What did he learn to change his mind or is his bias driving him again.
Robertson has made some new claims and Grahame agrees with all of them. It is amusing watching Grahame always buy every Jeremy supporter claim out there no matter how absurd and yet to swear up and down he is not a Jeremy supporter and to stop calling him one. He even erased a post where he stated he will never believe Jeremy is guilty because some friend of his who knew Jeremy said there is no way Jeremy could have done it. I referred to that post in another thread as proof he is a Jeremy supporter and biased so he deleted it and pretended he never wrote it.
-
Scipio how does a yank become so au fait with an old British murder case?
Did you follow many of the US notorious cases like The Menendez Brothers, Casey Anthony and Jodi Arias? I found the Arias trial riveting on live TV.
-
Scipio how does a yank become so au fait with an old British murder case?
Did you follow many of the US notorious cases like The Menendez Brothers, Casey Anthony and Jodi Arias? I found the Arias trial riveting on live TV.
A British friend who is interested in the Amityville Murders (there is some play being performed in the UK about the murders so apparently some interest in the case) told me about this case. Someone also posted about it on an Amityville message board as the UK's Amityville equivalent. I talked about the many differences in both and saw all the various articles and claims that made it look like Jeremy was innocent so decided to look in more detail if that is true. I was open to the idea he was actually innocent which made it more interesting but after researching it was clear those defending Jeremy are full of crap and the press simply publishing unfounded claims the defense has been making.
After seeing the evidence against the Menendez Brothers and Arias it was so clear they were guilty that it was not really worth following the court cases in much detail, just what the news showed. Most care about the raunchy sex stories and supposed beauty of Arias instead of the case itself anyway. That is what was sensationized and written about extensively in tabloids and articles.
The Casey Anthony case I didnd't follow in great deatail because the conclusion was obvious. They had evidence suggesting she hid the corpse but no evidence of her killing the child. They had nothing that could overcome her claim the child died by accident as opposed to in some nefarious way. In our system it was obvious they lacked the necessary evidence to prove murder or even manslaughter. So I was not surprised by the verdict at all and predicted it to people who wanted to discuss the matter but I chose not to watch it unfold. I personally believe that at minimum her negligence led to the death so wish they could have got her for something relatively serious. They framed their case all wrong though.
As far as modern cases I mostly look at ones where people vanish and there thus are giant unknowns. Some like Holly Bobo they have resolved but others like Jessica Heeringa remain unsolved.
-
If I was not banned I would be throwing his posts back in his face asking him how come he inssited in the past he insisted police followed proper procedures and no way would they rush in but now suddenly he agrees they would have. What did he learn to change his mind or is his bias driving him again.
Robertson has made some new claims and Grahame agrees with all of them. It is amusing watching Grahame always buy every Jeremy supporter claim out there no matter how absurd and yet to swear up and down he is not a Jeremy supporter and to stop calling him one. He even erased a post where he stated he will never believe Jeremy is guilty because some friend of his who knew Jeremy said there is no way Jeremy could have done it. I referred to that post in another thread as proof he is a Jeremy supporter and biased so he deleted it and pretended he never wrote it.
"Grahame, I like your ability to step back from the fray; a cool head." @)(++(*
Oh, "Bill", that's your credibilty STRAIGHT out of the window!! 8)-)))
-
"Grahame, I like your ability to step back from the fray; a cool head." @)(++(*
Oh, "Bill", that's your credibilty STRAIGHT out of the window!! 8)-)))
Hohoho "Bill" obviously hasn't witnessed all the Beltdowns @)(++(*
-
Jackie Preece is back posting on blue, with exciting news to tell the forum.
-
I think the blue forum need to talk about Gladys. Even I'm starting to feel sorry for him.
-
Jackie Preece is back posting on blue, with exciting news to tell the forum.
Has old Nelly really let 'Chloe 23' back on Tesco's! Nelly is a forgiving chap considering 'Chloe 23' exposed his full details and errrmmm interesting past to the World!
@)(++(*
And she's back on the Bamber case too with 'exciting news' ... oh goody! Jeremy Bamber himself dumped her like a bad habit but Tesco's will always have her back!
-
@)(++(*
I had to have a look at 'Chloe 23's' new ramblings and I see the old s...ky phone sex worker is using my full name in her posts! As NGB is obviously condoning personal information being used by that barren tramp, I have to assume he is happy for the personal wars to start again! Your choice Nelly!
And I see another classic from Gladys too! He actually says that he is not going to believe in Bamber's guilt because of Scipio's "depraved" posts! Only a complete plonker like Gladys could base his belief in Bamber's guilt or innocence by the attitude of other posters! Forget the facts and evidence, Gladys makes his mind up based upon whose supporters he gets on with!
@)(++(*
-
Can we have a 'Chloe 23' thread please .... seeing as the s...ky phonesex worker is using my name on her posts tagline?
We could have a 'mass debate' about a 50 something munter pretending she is 23 to talk dirty to very sad losers for money! My opinion is the phone s...k is even more tacky and sad than the pervs who pay her!
Can't the courts do something about this .... under the Trade Descriptions Act!
@)(++(*
-
Gladys is doing God on Blue 8)><(
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5596.msg245175.html?PHPSESSID=1b0feb61c7335a44c17071669a19b6ab#msg245175
-
Gladys is doing God on Blue 8)><(
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5596.msg245175.html?PHPSESSID=1b0feb61c7335a44c17071669a19b6ab#msg245175
Ooh er, it must be the heat.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIBTg7q9oNc
-
Ooh er, it must be the heat.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIBTg7q9oNc
..."ring of fire" @)(++(*
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Inflatable-Rubber-Cushion-Hemorrhoids-Relief/dp/B006HF183K
or should that be rim of fire 8)><(
-
..."ring of fire" @)(++(*
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Inflatable-Rubber-Cushion-Hemorrhoids-Relief/dp/B006HF183K
or should that be rim of fire 8)><(
GOOD GRIEF!! 16 inch hemorrhoids? They must look like mutant aubergines. 8(8-))
But I suppose it explains the selfie!! "Ol' chap"!! 8)-)))
-
I think the blue forum need to talk about Gladys. Even I'm starting to feel sorry for him.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1RS2pU4wRw
Bumpity bwww.youtube.com/watch?v=F1RS2pU4wRwump bump bump.
Gladys - you ALWAYS give it first, so take it, too. You insult and patronise, with your snarky little pops and silly emoticons, so don't bleat when someone comes along and gives you both barrels. Take it on the chin.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1RS2pU4wRw
-
www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1RS2pU4wRw
Bumpity bwww.youtube.com/watch?v=F1RS2pU4wRwump bump bump.
Gladys - you ALWAYS give it first, so take it, too. You insult and patronise, with your snarky little pops and silly emoticons, so don't bleat when someone comes along and gives you both barrels. Take it on the chin.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1RS2pU4wRw
I obviously have lame computer skills, but at least I've never pretended to be Gav. That was bum-clenchingly awful.
8-)(--)
-
I obviously have lame computer skills, but at least I've never pretended to be Gav. That was bum-clenchingly awful.
8-)(--)
It's only a matter of time before scipio gets banned, because he's so close to the truth.
So......where's ngb? And Roch?
No clever comments? Come on, ngb. You're such a smart alec, you use Jackie, and you used Steph Hall like an attack dog. Nothing to say to Scipio?
Massive flake.
-
It's only a matter of time before scipio gets banned, because he's so close to the truth.
So......where's ngb? And Roch?
No clever comments? Come on, ngb. You're such a smart alec, you use Jackie, and you used Steph Hall like an attack dog. Nothing to say to Scipio?
Massive flake.
Scipio is 100% right about Bamber but unfortunately in Scipio's world he is 100% right about everything and gets pretty shouty with anyone who dares contradict him! Arrogant septic tank!
-
Gladys has finally cracked ... He has kind of admitted Bamber is guilty and closed his account forever! @)(++(*
How many times is it now that he has left for good? Must be 20 odd! @)(++(*
-
Gladys has finally cracked ... He has kind of admitted Bamber is guilty and closed his account forever! @)(++(*
How many times is it now that he has left for good? Must be 20 odd! @)(++(*
He'll be back.
In the meantime, I hope he's finding something useful to do, and not going back on youtube and threatening to "ass-rape that fat b@stard cop till he's dead." 8(8-))
-
He'll be back.
In the meantime, I hope he's finding something useful to do, and not going back on youtube and threatening to "ass-rape that fat b@stard cop till he's dead." 8(8-))
Tell me Pugsy The Brave Gladys didn't really say that about a policeman did he?
-
Tell me Pugsy The Brave Gladys didn't really say that about a policeman did he?
I'm grounded till 4.00 so I'm watching Mrs Miniver, and Walter Pidgeon just said "Cheer up, Gladys"!! Ho ho!!
I think I'd better pm you! 8(0(*
-
I videoed Shona and Andi reading Grahame's goodbye forever post .... quite a moving scene actually!
For those not in the know Shona is the dark haired noisy one:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VAQjCYnjeS4
-
@)(++(*
-
Gladys will have his faith to draw on for comfort and strength during this difficult chapter of his life: post Blue blues 8)><(
Or...he might just resurface next week as..."Tonight Matthew I'm Going To Be"...God, The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit. Or even good ol Gav @)(++(*
-
Gladys has finally cracked ... He has kind of admitted Bamber is guilty and closed his account forever! @)(++(*
How many times is it now that he has left for good? Must be 20 odd! @)(++(*
What? ...not again! &%&£(+ Poor Gav, I honestly believe he knows the truth about Bamber but can't bring himself to admit it.
-
What? ...not again! &%&£(+ Poor Gav, I honestly believe he knows the truth about Bamber but can't bring himself to admit it.
Gladys is now a "guilter." Or, as he once so delicately put it, a "cock-sucking, small-dicked gaylord."
*&*%£
-
Gladys is now a "guilter." Or, as he once so delicately put it, a "cock-sucking, small-dicked gaylord."
*&*%£
But....kudos to Gladys for changing allegiance, especially as he wished that he himself was responsible for the Caffell boys' deaths, so that Bamber, convicted of the murders, could be released from prison. (To kill again?)
So, fair play, even Gladys got there in the end. Everyone does. Eventually.
Thank goodness for Scipio.
-
But....kudos to Gladys for changing allegiance, especially as he wished that he himself was responsible for the Caffell boys' deaths, so that Bamber, convicted of the murders, could be released from prison. (To kill again?)
So, fair play, even Gladys got there in the end. Everyone does. Eventually.
Thank goodness for Scipio.
So....the only two left are Mike, who will always have an ongoing vendetta against the police, and ngb, who has (imo) never believed that Bamber is innocent, but finances the Bamber forum and keeps up the facade of a mild-mannered ex-barrister.
It really is no wonder that Bamber is well and truly f..ked, and is where he belongs.
Just my opinion.
-
Bamber has lost a lot of supporters this year from the blue forum, many have changed their stance.
-
So....the only two left are Mike, who will always have an ongoing vendetta against the police, and ngb, who has (imo) never believed that Bamber is innocent, but finances the Bamber forum and keeps up the facade of a mild-mannered ex-barrister.
It really is no wonder that Bamber is well and truly f..ked, and is where he belongs.
Just my opinion.
I've had this conversation with bob and Hartley...why is Bamber so bloody sanguine about his plight? Why doesn't he kick and scream and fight? Why does he sit back and let silly, delusional women fight his corner?
-
I've had this conversation with bob and Hartley...why is Bamber so bloody sanguine about his plight? Why doesn't he kick and scream and fight? Why does he sit back and let silly, delusional women fight his corner?
Why is Bamber such an arrogant arsehole, and has never once mourned the loss of those two lovely boys?
-
Bamber has lost a lot of supporters this year from the blue forum, many have changed their stance.
Well it's not rocket science to work out Bamber is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt. Jeremy himself kindly proved it was either Sheila or him and the known physical facts from the murder scene prove it could not have been Sheila! Ergo Bamber 'it is whom what dunnit'!
Some very clever (and many mediocre) legal minds have tried to twist the crime scene to fit Bamber's story and the best they can come up with is ridiculous inventions of ritual cleaning and 'Aga heated rifle torturing'! Even with all their flights of fantasy they still can't produce one logical scenario to support Sheila's guilt!
With all due respect to Holly, Abs and the other couple of decent Bamber supporters, I believe anyone who can't see the obvious is either deliberately blinkered by wishful thinking or a blithering idiot!
-
Well it's not rocket science to work out Bamber is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt. Jeremy himself kindly proved it was either Sheila or him and the known physical facts from the murder scene prove it could not have been Sheila! Ergo Bamber 'it is whom what dunnit'!
Some very clever (and many mediocre) legal minds have tried to twist the crime scene to fit Bamber's story and the best they can come up with is ridiculous inventions of ritual cleaning and 'Aga heated rifle torturing'! Even with all their flights of fantasy they still can't produce one logical scenario to support Sheila's guilt!
With all due respect to Holly, Abs and the other couple of decent Bamber supporters, I believe anyone who can't see the obvious is either deliberately blinkered by wishful thinking or a blithering idiot!
Tim, guess it is like being half black: you are BLACK, period, but thanks for calling me decent!
You cannot call me a Bamber supporter, I have always been on the fence about this case. I have not been a 100% convinced of Bamber´s guilt because something is missing from the equation. There are things that don´t make sense and don´t fit and are not fully logical and explained.
I think the possible missing piece of the puzzle is that there was in fact a "hitman" - someone assisting JB, meaning there were two persons committing those murders that night.
I am pretty much alone with this thought, but I cannot pretend that everything has been explained when I don´t see it.
-
Jeremy Bamber is a liar, murderer and parasite. There is forensic and photographic evidence that proves his guilt, and as for his last remaining ally, an angry old woman who seems to be in love with him, if you think that Sheila looked "serene and grateful" I would advise you to look at the last image of James Foley. Executed in the most foul way, but his last expression was serene. Considering that you were once a nurse, I would expect you to know that facial muscles relax after death.
-
There are so many basic flaws in Bill's theory, it actually made me snork when I read it! Although, he writes well enough. And no one takes Gladys seriously, that's why he is so 8()(((@#.
I still can't believe that forum got rid of you and Hartley, but kept Gladys and susan. 8-)(--)
What a load of codswallop that Bill Robertson posted on blue. One of the daftest things he claims is that the police wouldn't have called out the TSU on the basis of Jeremy's phone call. Absolute bollocks.
The police would alert the TSU immediately there was any mention of firearms and we know that Jeremy told the police civilian operator that his father had told him that Sheila had a rifle and had gone berserk. I'm afraid the blue forum has attracted yet another deluded soul.
It never ceases to amaze how these people can spin the simplest event into something sinister. There was never any siege at White House Farm. It was dark and the first police responders had been told that there was someone in the house with a rifle. Unarmed police do not make any attempt to enter premises under those circumstances, they wait on the arrival of the armed response unit and daybreak. Normal practice common to every police force in Britain.
When Bews and his two colleagues arrived at the farmhouse they rightly set up a provisional perimeter and waited. There was no movement in the house and no sounds, no need to force entry. He did take Jeremy with him on a recce of the perimeter to gather information for the TSU for when they arrived. Again, no movement confirmed and no sounds of anyone in distress.
There isn't a single fact relating to events that morning which can in any way point to a police cover up. To suggest such is simply absurd and yet another case of clutching at straws.
-
What a load of codswallop that Bill Robertson posted on blue. One of the daftest things he claims is that the police wouldn't have called out the TSU on the basis of Jeremy's phone call. Absolute bollocks.
The police would alert the TSU immediately there was any mention of firearms and we know that Jeremy told the police civilian operator that his father had told him that Sheila had a rifle and had gone berserk. I'm afraid the blue forum has attracted yet another deluded soul.
Bamber, for the first time EVER, asked Sheila when she and the boys would be at the farm. Then invented the magic ears, rabbit crap, and leaving out bullets even though Ralph would have put them away, and June would have a fit if a gun and ammo were left lying around when the twins were staying.
Bamber just wasn't smart enough. He just didn't think it through.
-
Bamber, for the first time EVER, asked Sheila when she and the boys would be at the farm. Then invented the magic ears, rabbit crap, and leaving out bullets even though Ralph would have put them away, and June would have a fit if a gun and ammo were left lying around when the twins were staying.
Bamber just wasn't smart enough. He just didn't think it through.
He very nearly got away with it had it not been for Julie having the confidence to come forward and the late DS Jones for just being too smart for him. Stan Jones was onto Bamber from the moment he caught him sniggering just hours after the murders. Stan was of the old school and had the experience to be able to see through Bamber. Stan Jones was most definitely Bamber's nemesis.
-
He very nearly got away with it had it not been for Julie having the confidence to come forward and DS Jones for just being too smart for him.
Yep.
I reckon, 2 more plastic bowls full of mushy sprouts, then a massive heart attack.
I hope the f..ker rots in hell. 8((()*/
-
Yep.
I reckon, 2 more plastic bowls full of mushy sprouts, then a massive heart attack.
I hope the f..ker rots in hell. 8((()*/
Sorry, lookout, Mike and.....oh, just you two then. Right.
But it will be a snowy day in July before Bamber sees the light of day again.
Yay!! 8)--))
-
Sorry, lookout, Mike and.....oh, just you two then. Right.
But it will be a snowy day in July before Bamber sees the light of day again.
Yay!! 8)--))
Every time I see that Scouse s...ks name I think of the most ironic sentence ever uttered in the English language:
"i feel so sorry that Jeremy doesn't have his family around him to support him!"
I bet she is heartbroken Myra Hindley never got the chance to have kids of her own too!
-
Every time I see that Scouse s...ks name I think of the most ironic sentence ever uttered in the English language:
"i feel so sorry that Jeremy doesn't have his family around him to support him!"
I bet she is heartbroken Myra Hindley never got the chance to have kids of her own too!
I've actually wished that I could post again on blue when I've read the coarse, spiteful, bigoted bile written about Sheila, June and the remaining relatives. Thank goodness that the relatives have more grace and restraint than I do.
-
I've actually wished that I could post again on blue when I've read the coarse, spiteful, bigoted bile written about Sheila, June and the remaining relatives. Thank goodness that the relatives have more grace and restraint than I do.
She knows even less about the Bamber case than Gladys (ignorance level - Ninja) yet she has free rein to denigrate the reputations and memories of decent folk. Grim.
Having said that, after the truly disgraceful Hall debacle, I doubt that anything from the blue forum could dismay me now. 8(8-))
-
When Bamber tried to stage Sheila's body as a suicide, then realised she still had a pulse, he must have crapped himself. He shot her again, then staged the bible, then took the silencer off, wiped the blood off the end (clearly seen under the bible), then had to lose the silencer. Tried to lose it at the back of the cupboard. Oh dear. What a tangled web.
And if Sheila used the gun to batter Ralph with, her prints would be smeared all over that gun. Everywhere.
-
When Bamber tried to stage Sheila's body as a suicide, then realised she still had a pulse, he must have crapped himself. He shot her again, then staged the bible, then took the silencer off, wiped the blood off the end (clearly seen under the bible), then had to lose the silencer. Tried to lose it at the back of the cupboard. Oh dear. What a tangled web.
And if Sheila used the gun to batter Ralph with, her prints would be smeared all over that gun. Everywhere.
Come quick. Your sister has gone crazy with a gun.
Oh well. Whatever. Have a bit of a mooch, ring my girlfriend. Wank about a bit. Thumb through the Argos book. Oooh, that's a nice toaster.
Ugh.
-
Come quick. Your sister has gone crazy with a gun.
Oh well. Whatever. Have a bit of a mooch, ring my girlfriend. Wank about a bit. Thumb through the Argos book. Oooh, that's a nice toaster.
Ugh.
There was a chance, albeit a small chance, that Bamber could have saved the day. If there as a phone call. From Ralph. When Ralph was shot in bed, or being battered to death in the kitchen.
Jeremy, don't think about yourself, don't save yourself, don't call the police. just get here quick. You'll save the day.
-
Grahame is on record as stating that he has no time for Jeremy Bamber but he has always resisted admitting that he too sees him as guilty. Instead he deletes his account and disappears for a while.
Man up Grahame and admit it. You know as we do that there isn't a shred of evidence which supports Jeremy's claim even after 29 years.
-
Grahame is on record as stating that he has no time for Jeremy Bamber but he has always resisted admitting that he too sees him as guilty. Instead he deletes his account and disappears for a while.
Man up Grahame and admit it. You know as we do that there isn't a shred of evidence which supports Jeremy's claim even after 29 years.
There was no DNA testing in 1985 .... for Bamber ti be innocent (impossible!) he had to have been fitted up by the rellies and cops! I always thought it just confirms Bamber's guilt that later DNA testing just supported the official story and didn't help Bamber in the slightest.
-
Gladys is back 8)><(
And bible bashing
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5839.msg260389.html?PHPSESSID=f7374cc1f8c6bd02e90182eb3dbc7a39#msg260389
8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><(
-
They say senility is the second childhood .... Gladys is unique in that he reached his second childhood without ever having left his first!
&%&£(+
-
Gladys is back 8)><(
And bible bashing
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5839.msg260389.html?PHPSESSID=f7374cc1f8c6bd02e90182eb3dbc7a39#msg260389
8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( 8)><(
Yea, Mr Gee. Such a lot of thought has gone into that name, he must have risen more times than the flipping Phoenix @)(++(*
-
Yea, Mr Gee. Such a lot of thought has gone into that name, he must have risen more times than the flipping Phoenix @)(++(*
It gets even better John; according ti the Malodon oracle himself, he didn't really want to return (yet again!) but is responding ti popular demand!
*&*%£
-
It gets even better John; according ti the Malodon oracle himself, he didn't really want to return (yet again!) but is responding ti popular demand!
*&*%£
Yes, I notice he wants to herald a reconciliation on the blue forum now that the 'guilters' are beginning to swamp the apologists but it is he who bad mouths those he opposes. Part of the course I suppose.
-
Yes, I notice he wants to herald a reconciliation on the blue forum now that the 'guilters' are beginning to swamp the apologists but it is he who bad mouths those he opposes. Part of the course I suppose.
I must admit I am glad Gladys is back; I have missed his wit and wisdom! He reminds me of Alan Partridge; a true legend in his own lunchbox! Monkey tennis anyone?
-
I must admit I am glad Gladys is back; I have missed his wit and wisdom! He reminds me of Alan Partridge; a true legend in his own lunchbox! Monkey tennis anyone?
Thought for a moment there you said TIT as in the deluded fool variety 8@??)( @)(++(*
-
Thought for a moment there you said TIT as in the deluded fool variety 8@??)( @)(++(*
What truly baffles Gladys Titmus is why the rest of the world can't appreciate his greatness! The mere fact they can't understand his preeminence just reinforces his own superiority complex! I just hope the tenants on his cul-de-sac can't speak English .... for their sake!
-
Some profound posts from Claptrap and Gladys
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,886.msg262049.html#msg262049
Gladys "sin"? Always bashing the bible aren't you? Why cant you stick to secular language on the forum and use, for example, 'wrongdoing'? I find you a very creepy little man with your Calvinist crutch. Yes I remember when you were pushing the bible on Blue and I responded with a quip and you complained to Patti. Pah...you big girls blouse.
If I had to choose between a night on the town with say You, Misty's owner and Nelly v John, Tim and Myster I know who I would choose and I bet most other females would share my choice. But then I suspect that doesn't bother you too much does it Gladys 8(0(*
-
Some profound posts from Claptrap and Gladys
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,886.msg262049.html#msg262049
Gladys "sin"? Always bashing the bible aren't you? Why cant you stick to secular language on the forum and use, for example, 'wrongdoing'? I find you a very creepy little man with your Calvinist crutch. Yes I remember when you were pushing the bible on Blue and I responded with a quip and you complained to Patti. Pah...you big girls blouse.
If I had to choose between a night on the town with say You, Misty's owner and Nelly v John, Tim and Myster I know who I would choose and I bet most other females would share my choice. But then I suspect that doesn't bother you too much does it Gladys 8(0(*
Actually......Gladys and I had a dirty weekend away. He took me to Drinkstone Park, covered me in jam, then wrote about it on tripadvisor. 8**8:/:
-
Seems more posts are being deleted and archived on blue these days than are allowed to stand. hmm..