UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Disappeared and Abducted Children and Young Adults => Madeleine McCann (3) disappeared from her parent's holiday apartment at Ocean Club, Praia da Luz, Portugal on 3 May 2007. No trace of her has ever been found. => Topic started by: Robittybob1 on September 19, 2016, 03:01:07 AM
-
I was discussing the two sets of pyjamas with a friend and we both are sure there is a definite photoshopped section of the pyjamas. I wasn't able to tell what has happened whether a section was added but there is a section where the flowers are not formed properly.
Can anyone see the reasoning for that?
The same photo is on http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2709.msg186070#msg186070
But the smaller version don't have the same defects.
-
I noticed that previously Rob but didn't really think much about it.
-
Never mind the pyjamas, whats with the boards that they are lying on? Whats going on there?
-
Never mind the pyjamas, whats with the boards that they are lying on? Whats going on there?
And why is there a step (small) in the RH frame to the picture?
-
I was discussing the two sets of pyjamas with a friend and we both are sure there is a definite photoshopped section of the pyjamas. I wasn't able to tell what has happened whether a section was added but there is a section where the flowers are not formed properly.
Can anyone see the reasoning for that?
The same photo is on http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2709.msg186070#msg186070
But the smaller version don't have the same defects.
Am I alone in thinking that the pyjamas in the photo of the opening post (Crechmans daughters) are far to long and skinny for a child of her age . They seem to be for a much older child.
Was she two, or was she three? ... cant remember.
-
Am I alone in thinking that the pyjamas in the photo of the opening post (Crechmans daughters) are far to long and skinny for a child of her age . They seem to be for a much older child.
Was she two, or was she three? ... cant remember.
I saw an original article and there was no photoshopping so I thinking it must be just the photo on the UK justice site that has been manipulated.
Neither of those two show the cuffs at the bottom of the trousers. But more importantly there is no distorted flowers so the original put out has not be chopped around.
It is more like the photo uploaded on the site here http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2709.msg186070#msg186070 had been altered before being uploaded.
-
Am I alone in thinking that the pyjamas in the photo of the opening post (Crechmans daughters) are far to long and skinny for a child of her age . They seem to be for a much older child.
Was she two, or was she three? ... cant remember.
Furthermore, they are winter pyjamas with a fleece type top and long sleeves.
They don't seem right for a two year old in a potentially warm place like the Portugal
Algarve
... and i repeat, why does the photo that Robbity thinks photo-shopped have a notch in its RH frame ?
-
Furthermore, they are winter pyjamas with a fleece type top and long sleeves.
They don't seem right for a two year old in a potentially warm place like the Portugal
Algarve
... and i repeat, why does the photo that Robbity thinks photo-shopped have a notch in its RH frame ?
Could it be an attempt to alter the photo by laying physical cutouts of multiple photos on top of each other and rephotographing it? It certainly isn't a professionally done photoshopping job.
-
Could it be an attempt to alter the photo by laying physical cutouts of multiple photos on top of each other and rephotographing it? It certainly isn't a professionally done photoshopping job.
But why photoshop it?
-
But why photoshop it?
He may have been practicing the technique on this photo.
-
He may have been practicing the technique on this photo.
Seems improbable
-
Seems improbable
The photo was uploaded to the forum by Pathfinder, so is he still here? Does he recall where the photo came from?
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2709.msg186070#msg186070
-
Image source https://www.allmystery.de/i/t771edd_10f878_Pyjama-Vater-01.jpg
Google image search.
-
Image source https://www.allmystery.de/i/t771edd_10f878_Pyjama-Vater-01.jpg
Google image search.
So you would also have no idea why it was photoshopped? Tomorrow I'll try and put them side by side and see if I can see what they may have been trying to do.
-
There are two separate pictures of the Crecheman pyjamas. One shows the pyjama top plus part of the trousers.
The other shows the cuff part of the trouser.
The photo-shopped picture adds these two together.
That could explain why they look longer than they should.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9eJi_NdGaY @ 22:00 minute stage.
-
You can't take screenshots of the whole of the pyjamas as the view on the YT scrolls downward so we are unable to see the whole of the pyjamas in one view, so someone has pieced the part views together.
-
It still amazes me that such scruffy pair of pyjamas would be kept for all those years later. I keep thinking there must be a significant reason for that.
-
It still amazes me that such scruffy pair of pyjamas would be kept for all those years later. I keep thinking there must be a significant reason for that.
The pyjamas were probably packed away in a cupboard with all the other clothes the girl had grown out of. Not everyone is on the ball when it comes to sorting out old stuff, especially if they lead a busy life.
-
The pyjamas were probably packed away in a cupboard with all the other clothes the girl had grown out of. Not everyone is on the ball when it comes to sorting out old stuff, especially if they lead a busy life.
You're not wrong there.