UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Alleged Miscarriages of Justice => Jeremy Bamber and the callous murder of his father, mother, sister and twin nephews. Case effectively CLOSED by CCRC on basis of NO APPEAL REFERRAL. => Topic started by: Admin on March 05, 2012, 01:37:44 PM
-
Published 29 October 1986
(http://i.imgur.com/HqBg3.jpg)
-
Thank's for these cuttings admin.
I remember well Bamber being tried and everyone I knew was hoping for a guilty verdict. Most people didn't know the full details before the verdict but everyone had seen Bamber trying to sell those nude photos of Sheila to The Sun and hated him for it.
That behaviour showed the World just what a s..mbag Bamber is and everyone thought he was guilty before the verdict.
-
Thank's for these cuttings admin.
I remember well Bamber being tried and everyone I knew was hoping for a guilty verdict. Most people didn't know the full details before the verdict but everyone had seen Bamber trying to sell those nude photos of Sheila to The Sun and hated him for it.
That behaviour showed the World just what a s..mbag Bamber is and everyone thought he was guilty before the verdict.
Very true, I also remember the feelings at the time, people just couldn't understand how someone like Bamber with so much going for him could have done such a thing. I am quite sure there was a lot said and done in court which we will never see in any transcript now. Am I right in saying that part of the transcript is missing in any event. 8-)(--)
-
Thank's for these cuttings admin.
I remember well Bamber being tried and everyone I knew was hoping for a guilty verdict. Most people didn't know the full details before the verdict but everyone had seen Bamber trying to sell those nude photos of Sheila to The Sun and hated him for it.
That behaviour showed the World just what a s..mbag Bamber is and everyone thought he was guilty before the verdict.
Its good to read those reports again after all this time. I know that reporters sometimes overcook their stories but much of the time they actually report what is said in court which is useful if any other form of record does not exist.
-
I believe Bamber's testimony is lost but his cross examination exists. Now that is actually a bit unlucky for Bamber!
-
I believe Bamber's testimony is lost but his cross examination exists. Now that is actually a bit unlucky for Bamber! ;D
Rather convenient that they lost that bit and still had his cross examination. I smell a rat.
-
I believe Bamber's testimony is lost but his cross examination exists. Now that is actually a bit unlucky for Bamber! ;D
Rather convenient that they lost that bit and still had his cross examination. I smell a rat.
Must be yet more noble cause corruption eh?
-
Rather convenient that they lost that bit and still had his cross examination. I smell a rat.
Must be yet more noble cause corruption eh?
Did Bamber and Tesko share a cell?
-
Must be yet more noble cause corruption eh?
Did Bamber and Tesko share a cell?
They were in a protection Hall together for a time and possibly did share a cell.
-
Can you think of any other explanation why Tesko has been 100% consumed with freeing Bamber for 23 years .... never for a second supporting others who almost certainly are innocent like Simon Hall?
Bamber has nothing whatsoever to do with Tesko anymore yet Mike is still dedicating his life to him! The killer even chooses Preece over Tesko .... to remain so obsessed is just perverse.
-
Moderated
Can you think of any other explanation why Tesko has been 100% consumed with freeing Bamber for 23 years .... never for a second supporting others who almost certainly are innocent like Simon Hall?
Bamber has nothing whatsoever to do with Tesko anymore yet Mike is still dedicating his life to him! The killer even chooses Preece over Tesko .... to remain so obsessed is just perverse.
And yet it is sad to watch a basically good man as Tesko unravel, as he comes to terms with the fact that he has been used and decieved for 23 years.
-
Admin Note - Posters are reminded.
Please don't speculate on the sexuality of an identifiable individual unless you have evidence of such persuasion.
Thank you
Admin ?>)()<
-
Moderated
Does that Preece woman know about this? I understand she was planning a life in Australia with Bamber.
The good Lord made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
someone mention me and adam?
i am not going to australia at least i dont think so
i will have to ask billy and sandra
-
Admin Note - Posters are reminded.
Please don't speculate on the sexuality of an identifiable individual unless you have evidence of such persuasion.
Thank you
Admin
Fair enough admin. I wasn't being serious about Tesko bumming Bamber; I am just amazed at how a grown man (tesko) can be so obsessed with another (Bamber) who doesn't even want to associate with him.
-
Admin Note - Posters are reminded.
Please don't speculate on the sexuality of an identifiable individual unless you have evidence of such persuasion.
Thank you
Admin
Fair enough admin. I wasn't being serious about Tesko bu..ing Bamber; I am just amazed at how a grown man (tesko) can be so obsessed with another (Bamber) who doesn't even want to associate with him.
Well, I was being serious. Deadly serious. It's everywhere you look, these days.
-
Admin Note - Posters are reminded.
Please don't speculate on the sexuality of an identifiable individual unless you have evidence of such persuasion.
Thank you
Admin
Fair enough admin. I wasn't being serious about Tesko bu..ing Bamber; I am just amazed at how a grown man (tesko) can be so obsessed with another (Bamber) who doesn't even want to associate with him.
I must admit, the same thoughts went through my mind. After all, he only met the guy for a short while as they served sentences in the same unit, at least that is what Teskowski tells us. I still think it strange how a minor offender like Teskowski would have contact with a Cat A lifer unless they were both in protection.
Why has he spent all those years dong what he has done, has Bamber done a deal with him possibly?
-
Fair enough admin. I wasn't being serious about Tesko bu..ing Bamber; I am just amazed at how a grown man (tesko) can be so obsessed with another (Bamber) who doesn't even want to associate with him.
Well, I was being serious. Deadly serious. It's everywhere you look, these days.
Sorry if i am wrong about this but doesn't Mike have a family and grand children?
-
Admin Note - Posters are reminded.
Please don't speculate on the sexuality of an identifiable individual unless you have evidence of such persuasion.
Thank you
Admin
I see that admin has a much better working knowledge of how defamation law works than Neil the barrister.
-
Admin Note - Posters are reminded.
Please don't speculate on the sexuality of an identifiable individual unless you have evidence of such persuasion.
Thank you
Admin
I see that admin has a much better working knowledge of how defamation law works than Neil the barrister.
We like to run a tight ship gerald. A successful forum can only be built on mutual trust and respect. Allowing speculation to rule the day is a non starter for us. We must all be mindful that a wrongful conviction is a very serious subject and must be dealt with appropriately. Humour has its place too but must be done respectfully and humbly where possible.
We have found the forum to be extremely easy to moderate and this is due to the calibre of its members. Keep up the good work people. ?>)()<
-
Admin Note - Posters are reminded.
Please don't speculate on the sexuality of an identifiable individual unless you have evidence of such persuasion.
Thank you
Admin
I see that admin has a much better working knowledge of how defamation law works than Neil the barrister.
It wouldn't be defamation though these days; Mike & Jeremy can have a Civil Partnership if Bamber ever gets out if they are gay.
-
Admin Note - Posters are reminded.
Please don't speculate on the sexuality of an identifiable individual unless you have evidence of such persuasion.
Thank you
Admin
I see that admin has a much better working knowledge of how defamation law works than Neil the barrister.
It wouldn't be defamation though these days; Mike & Jeremy can have a Civil Partnership if Bamber ever gets out if they are gay.
Oh I say.... lol....ha ha ha.........
-
Rather convenient that they lost that bit and still had his cross examination. I smell a rat.
Must be yet more noble cause corruption eh?
Did Bamber and Tesko share a cell?
They did not share a cell.
-
The first shot to Sheila produced an amount of blood in her throat. If she had remained conscious after that shot, so that she could "shoot herself again" she would surely have coughed and spluttered that blood out of her mouth and onto her face and body. She would have felt as though she was drowning in her own blood, she couldn't possibly have prevented herself from coughing and gagging. So the first shot MUST have rendered her unconscious.
-
The first shot to Sheila produced an amount of blood in her throat. If she had remained conscious after that shot, so that she could "shoot herself again" she would surely have coughed and spluttered that blood out of her mouth and onto her face and body. She would have felt as though she was drowning in her own blood, she couldn't possibly have prevented herself from coughing and gagging. So the first shot MUST have rendered her unconscious.
and if the first shot was in the kitchen and then she ran upstairs as some would suggest (cough, splutter) then the blood would have been all down her front and on the lower half of her face, not just in two neat lines away from her nose and mouth.
-
The first shot to Sheila produced an amount of blood in her throat. If she had remained conscious after that shot, so that she could "shoot herself again" she would surely have coughed and spluttered that blood out of her mouth and onto her face and body. She would have felt as though she was drowning in her own blood, she couldn't possibly have prevented herself from coughing and gagging. So the first shot MUST have rendered her unconscious.
and if the first shot was in the kitchen and then she ran upstairs as some would suggest (cough, splutter) then the blood would have been all down her front and on the lower half of her face, not just in two neat lines away from her nose and mouth.
I don´t buy that the first shot was in the kitchen. It is too far fetched for me.
-
The first shot to Sheila produced an amount of blood in her throat. If she had remained conscious after that shot, so that she could "shoot herself again" she would surely have coughed and spluttered that blood out of her mouth and onto her face and body. She would have felt as though she was drowning in her own blood, she couldn't possibly have prevented herself from coughing and gagging. So the first shot MUST have rendered her unconscious.
She could have shot in quick succession.
-
The first shot to Sheila produced an amount of blood in her throat. If she had remained conscious after that shot, so that she could "shoot herself again" she would surely have coughed and spluttered that blood out of her mouth and onto her face and body. She would have felt as though she was drowning in her own blood, she couldn't possibly have prevented herself from coughing and gagging. So the first shot MUST have rendered her unconscious.
and if the first shot was in the kitchen and then she ran upstairs as some would suggest (cough, splutter) then the blood would have been all down her front and on the lower half of her face, not just in two neat lines away from her nose and mouth.
I don´t buy that the first shot was in the kitchen. It is too far fetched for me.
So abs (nice to meet you by the way ?{)(**), do you think Sheila shot herself once, then, in the same position realised she wasn't dead and shot herself again? What do you think happened?
-
How quick though, Abs? It would have to be very quick, before the blood flooded into her throat. While she was shocked, disorientated and in pain from the first shot?
-
The first shot to Sheila produced an amount of blood in her throat. If she had remained conscious after that shot, so that she could "shoot herself again" she would surely have coughed and spluttered that blood out of her mouth and onto her face and body. She would have felt as though she was drowning in her own blood, she couldn't possibly have prevented herself from coughing and gagging. So the first shot MUST have rendered her unconscious.
and if the first shot was in the kitchen and then she ran upstairs as some would suggest (cough, splutter) then the blood would have been all down her front and on the lower half of her face, not just in two neat lines away from her nose and mouth.
I don´t buy that the first shot was in the kitchen. It is too far fetched for me.
So abs (nice to meet you by the way ?{)(**), do you think Sheila shot herself once, then, in the same position realised she wasn't dead and shot herself again? What do you think happened?
I think it could have happened quickly. I don´t know of course.
Nice to meet you too. Suddenly the old board was gone, huh!
-
The first shot to Sheila produced an amount of blood in her throat. If she had remained conscious after that shot, so that she could "shoot herself again" she would surely have coughed and spluttered that blood out of her mouth and onto her face and body. She would have felt as though she was drowning in her own blood, she couldn't possibly have prevented herself from coughing and gagging. So the first shot MUST have rendered her unconscious.
and if the first shot was in the kitchen and then she ran upstairs as some would suggest (cough, splutter) then the blood would have been all down her front and on the lower half of her face, not just in two neat lines away from her nose and mouth.
I don´t buy that the first shot was in the kitchen. It is too far fetched for me.
So abs (nice to meet you by the way ?{)(**), do you think Sheila shot herself once, then, in the same position realised she wasn't dead and shot herself again? What do you think happened?
I think it could have happened quickly. I don´t know of course.
Nice to meet you too. Suddenly the old board was gone, huh!
If she shot herself once she would have fallen back prostrate on the floor. To do so again she would have had to have sat up to get the rifle in position thus blood would have dripped centrally down her neck and nightie....it didn't. She was shot while she lay on her back with her head on the floor. Suicide victims don't shoot them self in such a manner.
-
The position is equally awkward if another shot her, I think. I really can´t see how that happened.
-
The first shot to Sheila produced an amount of blood in her throat. If she had remained conscious after that shot, so that she could "shoot herself again" she would surely have coughed and spluttered that blood out of her mouth and onto her face and body. She would have felt as though she was drowning in her own blood, she couldn't possibly have prevented herself from coughing and gagging. So the first shot MUST have rendered her unconscious.
and if the first shot was in the kitchen and then she ran upstairs as some would suggest (cough, splutter) then the blood would have been all down her front and on the lower half of her face, not just in two neat lines away from her nose and mouth.
I don´t buy that the first shot was in the kitchen. It is too far fetched for me.
So abs (nice to meet you by the way ?{)(**), do you think Sheila shot herself once, then, in the same position realised she wasn't dead and shot herself again? What do you think happened?
I think it could have happened quickly. I don´t know of course.
Nice to meet you too. Suddenly the old board was gone, huh!
Hmm Rochford says I am courting you abs, methinks he underestimates your intelligence, don't you?
It could have happened quickly yes, but why would she risk a second failure with another shot herself to her throat at the funny angle she was found in? If she wanted to kill herself she'd have put the gun in her mouth and fired up through the roof of her mouth (sorry to be so graphic 8(8-)))
-
The first shot to Sheila produced an amount of blood in her throat. If she had remained conscious after that shot, so that she could "shoot herself again" she would surely have coughed and spluttered that blood out of her mouth and onto her face and body. She would have felt as though she was drowning in her own blood, she couldn't possibly have prevented herself from coughing and gagging. So the first shot MUST have rendered her unconscious.
and if the first shot was in the kitchen and then she ran upstairs as some would suggest (cough, splutter) then the blood would have been all down her front and on the lower half of her face, not just in two neat lines away from her nose and mouth.
I don´t buy that the first shot was in the kitchen. It is too far fetched for me.
So abs (nice to meet you by the way ?{)(**), do you think Sheila shot herself once, then, in the same position realised she wasn't dead and shot herself again? What do you think happened?
I think it could have happened quickly. I don´t know of course.
Nice to meet you too. Suddenly the old board was gone, huh!
Hmm Rochford says I am courting you abs, methinks he underestimates your intelligence, don't you?
It could have happened quickly yes, but why would she risk a second failure with another shot herself to her throat at the funny angle she was found in? If she wanted to kill herself she'd have put the gun in her mouth and fired up through the roof of her mouth (sorry to be so graphic 8(8-)))
Sheila was a beautiful woman with a beautiful face. I can see why she didn´t shoot herself in the face.
-
You really think that went through her mind after she supposedly killed her own children and her parents? Can't see that myself but we'll never know I guess.
-
You really think that went through her mind after she supposedly killed her own children and her parents? Can't see that myself but we'll never know I guess.
I'm sorry if I'm doing a Mike, but I want to pursue this. If Sheila had shot herself in the throat, a terrible, shocking, painful assault on her body with blood immediately leaking from the soft tissue, could she have kept her mouth closed, not gasped or choked, and calmy reposition the gun into a more effective position? Wouldn't her hands have been shaking with shock? And how incredibly "lucky" that there were two bullets left.
-
You really think that went through her mind after she supposedly killed her own children and her parents? Can't see that myself but we'll never know I guess.
I'm sorry if I'm doing a Mike, but I want to pursue this. If Sheila had shot herself in the throat, a terrible, shocking, painful assault on her body with blood immediately leaking from the soft tissue, could she have kept her mouth closed, not gasped or choked, and calmy reposition the gun into a more effective position? Wouldn't her hands have been shaking with shock? And how incredibly "lucky" that there were two bullets left.
I'm with you Shona, the scene would look totally different.
-
It would, Ammi (sorry, I can't work out how to do quotes if the original message is a long one!) This sounds like a ridiculous question, but how long would it take for Sheila to realise that she hadn't succeeded? That she was still alive? Surely it would take a few seconds, and all the time blood would be flooding into her throat and neck.......(I really DO sound like Mike, now!)
-
It would, Ammi (sorry, I can't work out how to do quotes if the original message is a long one!) This sounds like a ridiculous question, but how long would it take for Sheila to realise that she hadn't succeeded? That she was still alive? Surely it would take a few seconds, and all the time blood would be flooding into her throat and neck.......(I really DO sound like Mike, now!)
I can't work out how to edit, either!! I meant to say throat and mouth.
-
It would, Ammi (sorry, I can't work out how to do quotes if the original message is a long one!) This sounds like a ridiculous question, but how long would it take for Sheila to realise that she hadn't succeeded? That she was still alive? Surely it would take a few seconds, and all the time blood would be flooding into her throat and neck.......(I really DO sound like Mike, now!)
Not to me you don't Shona. Unless the second shot was involuntary - like muscle spasm/movement on death/incapacity, what you are suggesting is certainly how I would see it. I don't use guns but I would think it would take more than an involuntary spasm to fire a rifle, no?
-
It would, Ammi (sorry, I can't work out how to do quotes if the original message is a long one!) This sounds like a ridiculous question, but how long would it take for Sheila to realise that she hadn't succeeded? That she was still alive? Surely it would take a few seconds, and all the time blood would be flooding into her throat and neck.......(I really DO sound like Mike, now!)
I can't see that happening myself. Even if it didn't kill her she would have been knocked out...stunned. Had she come round her hands would have gone to the burning wound immediately.
Q. Was there blood on the inside of her hands...
A. NO
From the look on her face I believe she never regained consciousness from the first shot.
-
Are you having a problem editing Shona? Can I help?
-
Oh dear, I hope I'm not making a Rochy tit of myself here, but I think that the gun was a semi-automatic and could not "run away with itself." I think that Sheila would have actually had to pull the trigger. And even if it was an involuntary shot, wouldn't the gun have slipped away from her neck, rather than further across, which would have involved positioning? Am I being naive here, or have we cracked it?
-
Are you having a problem editing Shona? Can I help?
Ta, John. Unless I can see "quote" at the end of a message (if it's a long message) I can't work out how to quote. Does that make sense? I'm not even blonde at the moment. Oh, sorry, you said edit!! Oh Gawd. No, I can't see a modify thingy, either. I'm better with crayons.
-
Oh dear, I hope I'm not making a Rochy tit of myself here, but I think that the gun was a semi-automatic and could not "run away with itself." I think that Sheila would have actually had to pull the trigger. And even if it was an involuntary shot, wouldn't the gun have slipped away from her neck, rather than further across, which would have involved positioning? Am I being naive here, or have we cracked it?
As I understand it she would have had to pull the trigger again. I was just playing devil's advocate with the involuntary spasm etc as I suppose it is theoretically possible, but unlikely.
-
It would have been nigh impossible for her to shoot herself in virtually the same spot with an accidental shot.
-
It would have been nigh impossible for her to shoot herself in virtually the same spot with an accidental shot.
Perhaps this could be added to the misnomer list, then. The images of Sheila prove that she never regained consciousness after the first shot?
-
It would have been nigh impossible for her to shoot herself in virtually the same spot with an accidental shot.
Perhaps this could be added to the misnomer list, then. The images of Sheila prove that she never regained consciousness after the first shot?
Now amazon, that would not be for a gentleman to say about a lady.
We had a female prison officer in Edinburgh when I was there, her name was Vinegar Tits. @)(++(*
-
It would have been nigh impossible for her to shoot herself in virtually the same spot with an accidental shot.
Perhaps this could be added to the misnomer list, then. The images of Sheila prove that she never regained consciousness after the first shot?
I was just thinking the same thing Shona. The fact that she had no blood on her hands just shows that she never touched the bleeding wound after the first shot as would have been a normal reaction. I will get admin to draft another one up in the morning, he likes his early nights just now as his wife is back from Africa.
-
She possibly would have touched the wound, but I think that the fact that she didn't open her mouth after the first shot is important. No gasping, choking or gagging, no spray of blood. And yet, when her body was moved hours after, blood poured out of her mouth.
-
She possibly would have touched the wound, but I think that the fact that she didn't open her mouth after the first shot is important. No gasping, choking or gagging, no spray of blood. And yet, when her body was moved hours after, blood poured out of her mouth.
You're right, there would have been blood everywhere and all around her mouth and jaw and most certainly over the front of her nightie and on the carpet.
-
She possibly would have touched the wound, but I think that the fact that she didn't open her mouth after the first shot is important. No gasping, choking or gagging, no spray of blood. And yet, when her body was moved hours after, blood poured out of her mouth.
Perhaps this is our Eureka moment. Those images aren't fantastically clear, but clear enough.
-
Sorry to bang on, but it's a pity that Rochy doesn't post on here anymore. I'd love to see how his side would try to dismiss this. They've never explained Sheila's clean hands and perfect nails, either.
-
Sorry to bang on, but it's a pity that Rochy doesn't post on here anymore. I'd love to see how his side would try to dismiss this. They've never explained Sheila's clean hands and perfect nails, either.
They said she went and washed after shooting herself in the throat...as if!! 8-)(--)
-
Sorry to bang on, but it's a pity that Rochy doesn't post on here anymore. I'd love to see how his side would try to dismiss this. They've never explained Sheila's clean hands and perfect nails, either.
They said she went and washed after shooting herself in the throat...as if!! 8-)(--)
Good moaning, everybiddy. I was pissing by when I heard two shats. Bamber held in his hinds a smooking goon. I roast my kiss.
-
that Preece ones a nasty piece of work, it shows what the other inmates are like that they let her get away with it. Like she'd say, Jeremy must be proud
-
I agree dan. they must be shit scared of her.
-
that Preece ones a nasty piece of work, it shows what the other inmates are like that they let her get away with it. Like she'd say, Jeremy must be proud
-
that Preece ones a nasty piece of work, it shows what the other inmates are like that they let her get away with it. Like she'd say, Jeremy must be proud
Try to show some compassion, she suffers most grievously from envy and loneliness. There is good in all God's children, even if we sometimes have to seek to find it.
-
I am sure I posted a photo here of Ann and Peter last night??? Where has it gone to?? 8-)(--)
-
I am sure I posted a photo here of Ann and Peter last night??? Where has it gone to?? 8-)(--)
Seems it wasn't Dave.....better luck next time mate. 8(0(*
-
dam....and i was told it was to.. i must go back to my sources......sorry! 8()-000(
-
dam....and i was told it was to.. i must go back to my sources......sorry! 8()-000(
No bother mate. We all make mistakes at times.
-
(http://tueursenserie.wifeo.com/images/j/jb3/JB-39-.JPG)
Printed beneath the picture read...
All smiles! Jeremy Bamber pictured after being charged with the murders.
Despite the jumble of clues and sometimes controversial technical elements (the gun, the silencer, the footprints, the phone call to the police station Chelmsford), Arlidge pointed out that the case would revolve around the clash of the testimony of two young people, former friends and lovers: Jeremy Bamber and Julie Mugford.
One by one the officers who had watched for hours on the farm of White House came to describe that fateful night. The Chief Inspector Cook had to admit serious mistakes. He did not put on gloves to hold the gun, and did not thoroughly searched the closet of the office, which would eventually be found the muffler.
More seriously, Cook had negligently lost a hair found on the silencer and had not even told of that loss. In his summary of facts, the judge gave Cook a severe reprimand.
-
Jeremy Bamber claims he was framed for murder by cousins.
By Matthew Moore - 12 July 2010
Jeremy Bamber has accused two of his cousins of manipulating the evidence that led to his conviction for murdering five relatives in one of Britain’s most notorious crimes.
Bamber, who has served nearly 25 years of a life sentence for killing his adoptive parents, sister and her twin children, claims he was set up in a conspiracy to cut him out of the inheritance.
Bamber has always maintained his innocence and the Criminal Cases Review Commission is currently analysing photographic evidence which his supporters claim shows he cannot have been responsible for the rampage at his parents’ Essex farmhouse in 1985.
But his allegations against Ann Eaton and David Boutflour, made in his first full prison interview, represent the first time he has directly blamed other people for his plight.
Mr Boutflour yesterday dismissed the allegations as “absolute piffle” and said he and his sister had no reason to incriminate their cousin, who was described by the trial judge as “evil, almost beyond belief”.
Bamber, who is now 49, was found guilty of the murders after a rifle silencer covered in specks of blood, red paint and a single hair was found in a cupboard at White House Farm in the village of Tolleshunt D'Arcy days after the killing.
Link (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7884046/Jeremy-Bamber-claims-he-was-framed-for-murder-by-cousins.html)
-
Killer Bamber sues family again.
By James Hore - 26 January 2004
MASS murderer Jeremy Bamber has launched a fresh claim for £325,000 compensation against four members of his family.
Bamber was jailed for life in 1986 after he was found guilty of killing his adoptive parents, June and Nevill, his six-year-old nephews, Nicholas and Daniel, and his sister Sheila Caffell in Tolleshunt D'Arcy, near Maldon.
However, Bamber – who has been told he will never be released – has always maintained his innocence and believes he was convicted on flawed evidence.
The latest writ issued from his prison cell is against his adopted aunt and uncle, Pamela and Robert Boutflour, his cousin, Ann Eaton, and the company secretary, Sarah Jane Eaton, for money which he claimed to be owed from shares he held with Osea Road Camp Sites Limited.
The company was set up and owned by Bamber's grandparents, Leslie and Mabel Speakman, and in the 1970s he was given 750 shares.
But Bamber claimed since 1985 he had received no financial remuneration from the company, "contrary to the intentions" of his grandfather.
Bamber alleged he had been frozen out of the company by the actions of his family, claiming they had taken directors' fees and not paid any dividends.
The High Court writ claimed Osea Road Camp Sites Limited had made increasing profits since 1985 and he was owed, with interest, £325,709.
It added: "Since 1985 it is realistically estimated that the claimant's co-owners of Osea Road Camp Sites Limited have paid themselves £2,090,236 and paid him nothing at all."
His latest writ follows a unsuccessful action against the family for £1.27million after Bamber claimed he had been unfairly cut out of his grandmother's will.
Pamela Boutflour said last night her solicitors were dealing with the matter and added: "I had not really thought about it, we have just finished with the last one, it gets tiring.
"There is nothing to say at the moment – the last one was very satisfactory and I am sure this one won't be successful."
But Bamber said last night: "It is a legitimate claim and I will be pursuing it and as far as I can see I am entitled to it."
In August 1985, Bamber's mother and his six-year-old nephews were shot in their beds at Whitehouse Farm in Tolleshunt D'arcy.
His father Nevill was found dead downstairs, while the body of his sister Sheila Caffell, a model nicknamed Bambi, was discovered by her parents' bed.
Bamber had denied the murders, but was convicted in 1986 and jailed for life. His appeal against conviction was heard in 2002 and proved unsuccessful.
In a television documentary screened earlier this month, Ann Eaton spoke of her fears that she and her family would be "picked off" should Bamber ever be released.
Mrs Eaton, who now lives in the farmhouse where the killings took place, said: "We know that. It is more than just a fear, we know it."
Link (http://www.eadt.co.uk/news/killer_bamber_sues_family_again_1_63405?ot=archant.PrintFriendlyPageLayout.ot)
-
Thank you for posting these press cuttings. It makes a welcome change to re-visit the reports at the time.
If a daughter of my mine was running amok with a gun while my grandchildren were sleeping I would not be making any telephone calls.
Jeremy Bamber got this aspect of his alibi very wrong.
Even if he had said nothing then Mugford may still have had the influence she did.
I wonder if Jeremy's rejection by his natural parents played some part in his development.
I await with interest Simon McKay's basis of the appeal application to the CCRC that implies that Shelia was the killer.
Recent postings on the other forum seem to suggest that the second shot was fired by the police. If Shelia had taken a shot anywhere than under the chin I could almost see some logic in this theory.
-
The police shot her is a complete red herring. Such an event could never have been covered up for a number of reasons not least that such a shot would have been clearly heard in the stillness of the morning and as the police use higher powered weapons the consequences of her being shot by a different weapon would have been very obvious to the eye.
These stupid theories just serve to highlight the naivety of some of those posting on the Bamber forum. If Bamber is ever to have a realistic chance of freedom they really need to up their game plan.
-
Here is an interesting full spread article about the White House Farm murders which I came across recently published by the Sunday Times Magazine in July 2010.
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B5DLsf0UggyWMDBjNWMwNDMtNTNhNC00NGRmLThiNjQtNWQ0OTZmMDEzMmU0&hl=en_US (https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B5DLsf0UggyWMDBjNWMwNDMtNTNhNC00NGRmLThiNjQtNWQ0OTZmMDEzMmU0&hl=en_US)
(http://i.imgur.com/TmB64.gif)
-
Evening Times - Tuesday 28 October 1986
(http://i.imgur.com/YqmMm.jpg)
To read click here (http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=cd1AAAAAIBAJ&sjid=6qYMAAAAIBAJ&dq=brett%20collins%20bamber&pg=5839%2C6644530)
-
Indicted on 5 murder charges - 30 September 1985
(http://i.imgur.com/Xi3pN.jpg)
-
(http://i.imgur.com/kzLAk.jpg) (http://i.imgur.com/jEviW.jpg) (http://i.imgur.com/JSXEY.jpg)
-
(http://i.imgur.com/UfGeC.jpg)
The murder weapon complete with sound moderator.
-
(http://i.imgur.com/KyfE1.jpg)
Plumber and alleged mercenary Matthew McDonald