Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Please don't be silly about this ... the man is a career criminal with convictions for child abuse.  Funny you didn't mind the comparison being drawn on the forum between innocence and guilt before now 😀

Fgs was he the only one in the area [unique like] ..same as the unique abduction.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11819000

Brown said it was "extremely unlikely" anyone from a child sex ring would have abducted Madeleine. She said children could be illegally bought in some poor areas or "easily taken from drug addicts and prostitutes".

"Even blonde ones," she said.

'They're not going to steal a British tourist from a holiday resort because they know that will prompt a major investigation into them."
 
2
The thread title is ... "Is there more circumstantial  evidence against the mccanns than there is CB"
I've voiced my opinion on that ... but it is what it is.

Obviously you don't have a scooby about 'evidence' against the McCanns ... all of which is in the public domain ...  because had you known you wouldn't have been backwards in coming forward with it.  So no point in asking.

But it is thought provoking that those who claim to know are apparently keeping it very much to themselves when asked.
At least you agree that the thread title doesn't actually ask for any evidence to be listed. Thanks for that.
The rest was just detritus.
3
I think the money tree for Amaral as represented by Madeleine is being cut down root and branch by German intervention.

Amaral is well aware of this.  I think you may well be too if your posts are anything to go by.  Although sometimes they are easier to decipher than at others.
Your posts read like Helen Keller discovering brail for the first time, but who's judging.
As for Amaral's Golden Goose Laying Egg Goose Egg Layer courtesy of Mr and Mrs McCann, it's a win / win. If CB is not charged - sweet, he just needs to shake the tree and another daft hack will pop over for an exclusive. If he is, then every dope with a microphone will want to interview him.
If he's finished his lunch he may well be relaxing poolside, pondering which wing of the villa to develop next.
4
Being a career criminal with convictions for child abuse isn't evidence that he killed Madeleine McCann.

Did I say that ??  I know I did not.  Allow me to reiterate with regard to the thread title ...  "Funny you didn't mind the comparison being drawn on the forum between innocence and guilt before now 😀"

The question has been asked about McCann evidence.  You have been unable to provide an answer, nor has anyone else. 

Says it all really.
5
Being a career criminal with convictions for child abuse isn't evidence that he killed Madeleine McCann.

Its evidence of his character...and therefore part of the circumstantial evidence.

His  statement that he wanted to find something small and use it for days...is evidence for motive.

The statements by his associates

the statement by his girlfriend

His phone ping in PDL placing him in the area that night.


Then we have the apparrent lack of an alibi and whatever HCW has as his concrete evidence.


as opposed to basically nothing of any substance  against the McCanns



6
...beep....beep....beep beep....beep.......KERRCHHINNGG.
Another talking heads invoice being rang up on the Amaral Retirement Fund till.
His accountant and him are probably on the lash right now, enjoying his usual 4 hour boozy lunch.
He'll be dining out on this story probably forever. The man's an utter genius. Felicidades Snr. Ole!

I think the money tree for Amaral as represented by Madeleine is being cut down root and branch by German intervention.

Amaral is well aware of this.  I think you may well be too if your posts are anything to go by.  Although sometimes they are easier to decipher than at others.
7
Please don't be silly about this ... the man is a career criminal with convictions for child abuse.  Funny you didn't mind the comparison being drawn on the forum between innocence and guilt before now 😀

Being a career criminal with convictions for child abuse isn't evidence that he killed Madeleine McCann.
8
What, of substance, has been produced against Christian B?

Please don't be silly about this ... the man is a career criminal with convictions for child abuse.  Funny you didn't mind the comparison being drawn on the forum between innocence and guilt before now 😀
9
Gufffaw. Stop. Too funny.
In fairness, the thread title doesn't ask to list any, just whether there's more circumstantial evidence against the McCann's than there is CB.

....and it's a question we can't answer, as we don't know what circumstantial evidence there is, because the policeman is playing poker with a little girl's life and the feelings of two apparently bereft parents.

The thread title is ... "Is there more circumstantial  evidence against the mccanns than there is CB"
I've voiced my opinion on that ... but it is what it is.

Obviously you don't have a scooby about 'evidence' against the McCanns ... all of which is in the public domain ...  because had you known you wouldn't have been backwards in coming forward with it.  So no point in asking.

But it is thought provoking that those who claim to know are apparently keeping it very much to themselves when asked.
10
Not only Gunit.  Despite the thread title no-one has been able to produce anything of substance against the McCanns not even if just more hot air.

What, of substance, has been produced against Christian B?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10