Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
3 - The re-enactment, within the LOR, shall take place probably on May 15, 2008, between 5.30 p.m. and 11 p.m., thus covering the time period before dinner, dinner time and about an hour after having checked that the child had gone missing;

5 - The re-enactment will be carried out with the attendance of the nine holidaying friends, as well as, incidentally, any figurant considered to be necessary for a visualization of the events, i.e. a man carrying a child;

14 - The PJ considers this re-enactment to be highly important, and hopes the witnesses show their total cooperation, as they have been doing so far, towards finding out the truth.

Paulo Rebelo

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/RE_ENACTMENT.htm
2
Perhaps thereís a clue in the fact that not even the PJ considered it necessary to reconstitute the men playing tennis or the parents putting their kids to bed, probably because it would have been an entirely pointless exercise that would reveal nothing more than a few witnesses remembered coming and going from one to the other at slightly different times, and would also necessitate the presence of the children, hardly fair or beneficial to anyone to drag them into it.  But guess what?  I have no interest in trying to convince you of anything as you strike me as the sort that would argue the sky was pink if I suggested it was blue.
Did the PJ ever define what part of the night they wanted reconstructed?  Was it just whether Jane could pass by Gerry and Jez and not be  seen?  Or was it how Matt did his check?

I can't see how any of those could be reconstructed and for all the previous scenarios that played out for the week would not be replicated.
3
So far you have done nothing to convince me your post(s) extend beyond you believe it is daft simply because you wish to say it is so.
There is hardly a cogent argument proferred by your goodself to substantiate why the investigators would not wish to test statements to the point, if you will, "does it all hang together from 17:30 til 22:00" ?
Perhaps thereís a clue in the fact that not even the PJ considered it necessary to reconstitute the men playing tennis or the parents putting their kids to bed, probably because it would have been an entirely pointless exercise that would reveal nothing more than a few witnesses remembered coming and going from one to the other at slightly different times, and would also necessitate the presence of the children, hardly fair or beneficial to anyone to drag them into it.  But guess what?  I have no interest in trying to convince you of anything as you strike me as the sort that would argue the sky was pink if I suggested it was blue.
4
If you would like to sketch it all up with some numbers chucked at it we will have a better appreciation of your point.
As described it would seem to fly in the face of Bernoulli's and Euler's ideas.
A link to Euler's ideas would be appreciated.
Bernoulli ideas show a lowered pressure perpendicular to the gas flow.  But that is unimportant for the door is held by the hinges from moving in the direction of that lowered pressure.
5
If you can see the same effect caused by the river analogy I will agree with you entirely.   The narrow portion of the river constricts the flow until the pressure rises the river level will rise and hence there is an increased drop through the rapid section.

So as you closed the door the pressure in the room rises and hence the flow velocity thorough the narrow portion will be faster than when the door was wide open.

If you would like to sketch it all up with some numbers chucked at it we will have a better appreciation of your point.
As described it would seem to fly in the face of Bernoulli's and Euler's ideas.

6
Only if the upstream pressure is increased accordingly or the flow rate reduces.
If you can see the same effect caused by the river analogy I will agree with you entirely.   The narrow portion of the river constricts the flow until the pressure rises as the river level will rise and hence there is an increased drop in pressure (height) through the rapid section.

So as you closed the door the pressure in the room rises and hence the flow velocity  thorough the narrow portion will be faster (although the total amount of air will be less) than when the door was wide open.
7
No, what is absurd are the two suggestions here that the reconstitution should have covered the men playing tennis and everything that happened from5.30pm onwards, which in case you hadnít noticed, covered the period of putting children to bed and getting ready to go out.

So far you have done nothing to convince me your post(s) extend beyond you believe it is daft simply because you wish to say it is so.
There is hardly a cogent argument proferred by your goodself to substantiate why the investigators would not wish to test statements to the point, if you will, "does it all hang together from 17:30 til 22:00" ?
8
New members please introduce yourself here. / Re: Feeling safe
« Last post by Real justice on May 21, 2018, 09:42:30 PM »
I'm thinking how successful the class of '92 was  8(>((  Then when these players all reached their sell by date, around the same time, they didn't seem to have other homegrown players coming through to replace them? 

I had a bad feeling about FA cup final which sadly became a reality  8)><(  Anyway Juan Mata I got to see Juan Mata  8**8:/: 8)--))

I have more confidence in Liverpool winning the CL.  They always seem to deliver on the big stage.  Remember the CL final 2005. 

Ronaldo is a football genius but my fave modern player is Messi.
Ha Ha, never forget Alan Hanson when he said ďyou never win anything with kidsĒ  they were the backbone for years to come, they won so much because they loved the club.  I think we still have some good players coming through, nothing like the class of 92, we probably havenít got the right manager to nurture young talent like Fergie.  Thatís no disrespect to Mourinho though.
It was a poor final, I couldnít see Utd scoring  8()(((@# they went for it in the second half but donít have the class like City at the moment.  Hope Liverpool do it, anyone else I would be confident that they will do it, Madrid are a different opposition in the Champions League, they havenít done well domestically this year, the only thing that will appease those fans is the Champions league cup.

Love Juan Mata, even when he played for Chelsea, i donít think heís one of Mourinho favourites though?  Hard to choose between Ronaldo and Messi both great players along with Zidane and Ooh aah Cantona.

I see Utd mean Buisness straight away with the womenís football team, itís rumoured  they have poached Phil Nevilleís number two as their manager (CASEY Stoney) She has 130 England caps and skippered team GB at the olympics.

Football is going to take a new direction soon I think Holly, itís moving more and more to where only the big clubs matter, Fifa is getting in on the action now at club level,  the new Club World Cup is just around the corner, giving more and more money to the bigger clubs Iím afraid. Fifa has seen how much the Champions league generates and they want a slice as well, $25 billion  *%87
9
It would have coincided with one of the gusts that night. 
I am trying to think of analogy that is easier to visualise for we can't see air moving around a door.
Think of a river where it is deep and wide the current moves slowly but over narrowed portions it moves rapidly.
Same with a door in a breeze the rate of air velocity will increase as the door is closed.

Only if the upstream pressure is increased accordingly or the flow rate reduces.
10
But your reply wasnít to anyone else it was to me. Can I suggest if you want to answer a specific question you do so under that question and not under my point.
the post you made was in reply to mine and did not pose any question.   I had the right of reply and did so.  If you donít like my replies I recommend you donít respond to any of my posts henceforth.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10