Author Topic: Sceptics beliefs ?  (Read 242373 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1845 on: April 26, 2019, 06:22:32 PM »
Oops, changing the subject are we?  Nice move.  8((()*/

I assumed we'd finished that part of the discussion, since I am right & you are wrong.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline barrier

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1846 on: April 26, 2019, 06:23:14 PM »
As is the witness description of Kate & Gerry carrying a big black bag & acting suspiciously.

Smithman, don't forget Smithman.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1847 on: April 26, 2019, 06:23:30 PM »
I assumed we'd finished that part of the discussion, since I am right & you are wrong.
What am I wrong about, exactly?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline faithlilly

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1848 on: April 26, 2019, 06:24:14 PM »
Does he really ... where can I read that?

The article does say ...
Snip
It was the first time the McCanns’ friends had been named in public, but Sol’s journalist Felicia Cabrita had their names and phone numbers and details from their witness statements. She had called them all, and at least one other witness, Jes Wilkins.

The information had been handed to Cabrita by the police – she says she acquired the material through good journalism, which in a sense it was – and her source is widely believed by her colleagues to have been the former head of the inquiry, Goncalo Amaral.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/kate-and-gerry-mccann-beyond-the-smears-8hlc6qx7k70

But we knew that already.

Widely believed by her colleagues? Must be true then.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1849 on: April 26, 2019, 06:24:36 PM »
Smithman, don't forget Smithman.

I hadn't. I was saving him for later, him & his child wearing the wrong jammies.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Brietta

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1850 on: April 26, 2019, 06:25:02 PM »
As is the witness description of Kate & Gerry carrying a big black bag & acting suspiciously.

Kate mentioned the ridiculous claim in her book ... where does your witness statement appear in the files? 
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1851 on: April 26, 2019, 06:25:19 PM »
What am I wrong about, exactly?

Abduction for a start.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1852 on: April 26, 2019, 06:25:57 PM »
Widely believed by her colleagues? Must be true then.
More than likely.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1853 on: April 26, 2019, 06:26:18 PM »
Kate mentioned the ridiculous claim in her book ... where does your witness statement appear in the files?

In the same part of the files where the note left in reception is found, I'd imagine
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Brietta

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1854 on: April 26, 2019, 06:31:48 PM »
In the same part of the files where the note left in reception is found, I'd imagine
Another non-existent witness?  Amaral certainly used anonymous 'witnesses' to great effect to bolster his lies but we are expected to be able to prove our claims.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1855 on: April 26, 2019, 06:33:55 PM »
Another non-existent witness?  Amaral certainly used anonymous 'witnesses' to great effect to bolster his lies but we are expected to be able to prove our claims.

Kate claimed the witness exists, so it must be true.
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1856 on: April 26, 2019, 06:39:42 PM »
i think I can say with certainty taht whilst posters here and elsewhere havent moved on from gemmied shutters in the last 12 years ...SY and the PJ have

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1857 on: April 26, 2019, 06:41:10 PM »
In the same part of the files where the note left in reception is found, I'd imagine
If there was no note left in reception in the files and Kate is lying then the police have her bang to rights.  Why would you lie about something that is so very easily verifiable by the boys in blue?  Do you think she WANTS them to suspect her?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline The General

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1858 on: April 26, 2019, 06:43:36 PM »
i think I can say with certainty taht whilst posters here and elsewhere havent moved on from gemmied shutters in the last 12 years ...SY and the PJ have
So we're happy now then that the burglarductor(s) made good their escape through the patio door and not the non-jemmied window?
The 2nd Youngest Member of the Forum

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Sceptics beliefs ?
« Reply #1859 on: April 26, 2019, 06:45:07 PM »
If there was no note left in reception in the files and Kate is lying then the police have her bang to rights.  Why would you lie about something that is so very easily verifiable by the boys in blue?  Do you think she WANTS them to suspect her?

What could they possibly charge her with?
I stand with Putin. Glory to Mother Putin.