Alleged Miscarriages of Justice > Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones. Case currently being reviewed by the SCCRC. Confidential Hotline No 07092 984231.

Sandra Lean submits new Application to SCCRC in Luke Mitchell case.

(1/6) > >>

John:
Luke Mitchell family friend and representative (not lawyer) Miss Sandra Lean delivered a 300-page dossier to the SCCRC in Glasgow yesterday.  The same dossier that she has been working on for several months.

http://www.scotsman.com/news/i-m-an-innocent-lad-condemned-by-lies-and-errors-claims-luke-mitchell-1-2424857


devils advocate:
I find Luke Mitchell's comments remarkable given that nearly 9 years have now gone by since Jodi's murder.  To quote from the above article,

Outside the SCCRC building, Ms Mitchell, accompanied by her lawyer, Sandra Lean, who has led the case review application, issued a statement written by Mitchell in his prison cell. He wrote that next week would mark nine years behind bars. “Another one spent without my family and friends. Over the last nine years, I have lost so much – my girlfriend, my beloved grandmother, my dog and, of course, my freedom – the one thing we all take for granted.

“This was down to lies, deceptions and a fully flawed murder investigation. I was let down by the people we are meant to trust – the police and lawyers. This led to an innocent lad locked up in prison, and a guilty one allowed to go free.



It would be laughable it it wasn't so sad.  He says he lost his girlfriend but we know he was two-timing Jodi Jones with another girl.   He speaks of lies and deceptions yet his own brother whom he says was in the family home with him while Jodi Jones was being butchured faled to corroborate his story.  He now blames his lawyers and where have we all seen this before?  Mitchell had the benefit of the most influencial lawyer in scotland at the time yet he still failed to get him off.

One last comment and I will agree with you in your analysis of Sandra Lean.  She isn't a lawyer, she has qualifications in psychology which is far cry from the legal establishment.  I don't belive she has ever worked for any firm of lawyers which is a prerequisite to gaining a law qualification.  She may be able to pull the wool over the eyes of the Scotsman journalists but she isn't fooling anyone for a minute.

John:

--- Quote from: devils advocate on July 21, 2012, 02:19:38 PM ---I find his comments remarkable giveb that nearly 9 years have now gone by since Jodi's murder.  To quote from the above article,

Outside the SCCRC building, Ms Mitchell, accompanied by her lawyer, Sandra Lean, who has led the case review application, issued a statement written by Mitchell in his prison cell. He wrote that next week would mark nine years behind bars. “Another one spent without my family and friends. Over the last nine years, I have lost so much – my girlfriend, my beloved grandmother, my dog and, of course, my freedom – the one thing we all take for granted.

“This was down to lies, deceptions and a fully flawed murder investigation. I was let down by the people we are meant to trust – the police and lawyers. This led to an innocent lad locked up in prison, and a guilty one allowed to go free.



It would be laughable it it wasn't so sad.  He says he lost his girlfriend but we know he was two-timing Jodi Jones with another girl.   He speaks of lies and deceptions yet his own brother whom he says was in the family home with him while Jodi Jones was being butchured faled to corroborate his story.  He now blames his lawyers and where have we all seen this before?  Mitchell had the benefit of the most influencial lawyer in scotland at the time yet he still failed to get him off.

One last comment and I will agree with you in your analysis of Sandra Lean.  She isn't a lawyer, she has qualifications in psychology which is far cry from the legal establishment.  I don't belive she has ever worked for any firm of lawyers which is a prerequisite to gaining a law qualification.  She may be able to pull the wool over the eyes of the Scotsman journalists but she isn't fooling anyone for a minute.

--- End quote ---

That is an excellent point and it might be worth pointing out that her co director and founder of the website which is referred to in the Scotsman article, namely the Wrongly Accused Person Organisation, is Billy Middleton who was referred to earlier in this thread.  Middleton's claim to fame other than his internet scamming and spamming is that he was once a Mussel fisherman.  I believe he now resides in his parents home in Lerwick having been repatriated back there by Sandra Lean and her daughter.  It is my understanding that Middleton is shunned by the local community in Lerwick and the Shetland Islands at large and this has resulted in him failing to take up gainful employment.

devils advocate:

--- Quote from: John on July 21, 2012, 02:28:44 PM ---
--- Quote from: devils advocate on July 21, 2012, 02:19:38 PM ---I find his comments remarkable giveb that nearly 9 years have now gone by since Jodi's murder.  To quote from the above article,

Outside the SCCRC building, Ms Mitchell, accompanied by her lawyer, Sandra Lean, who has led the case review application, issued a statement written by Mitchell in his prison cell. He wrote that next week would mark nine years behind bars. “Another one spent without my family and friends. Over the last nine years, I have lost so much – my girlfriend, my beloved grandmother, my dog and, of course, my freedom – the one thing we all take for granted.

“This was down to lies, deceptions and a fully flawed murder investigation. I was let down by the people we are meant to trust – the police and lawyers. This led to an innocent lad locked up in prison, and a guilty one allowed to go free.



It would be laughable it it wasn't so sad.  He says he lost his girlfriend but we know he was two-timing Jodi Jones with another girl.   He speaks of lies and deceptions yet his own brother whom he says was in the family home with him while Jodi Jones was being butchured faled to corroborate his story.  He now blames his lawyers and where have we all seen this before?  Mitchell had the benefit of the most influencial lawyer in scotland at the time yet he still failed to get him off.

One last comment and I will agree with you in your analysis of Sandra Lean.  She isn't a lawyer, she has qualifications in psychology which is far cry from the legal establishment.  I don't belive she has ever worked for any firm of lawyers which is a prerequisite to gaining a law qualification.  She may be able to pull the wool over the eyes of the Scotsman journalists but she isn't fooling anyone for a minute.

--- End quote ---

That is an excellent point and it might be worth pointing out that her co director and founder of the website which is referred to in the Scotsman article, namely the Wrongly Accused Person Organisation, is Billy Middleton who was referred to earlier in this thread.  Middleton's claim to fame other than his internet scamming and spamming is that he was once a Mussel fisherman.  I believe he now resides in his parents home in Lerwick having been repatriated back there by Sandra Lean and her daughter.  It is my understanding that Middleton is shunned by the local community in Lerwick and the Shetland Islands at large and this has resulted in him failing to take up gainful employment.

--- End quote ---

Lean loves the publicity doesn't she??   @)(++(*

John:

--- Quote from: devils advocate on July 21, 2012, 02:31:56 PM ---

Lean loves the publicity doesn't she??   @)(++(*

--- End quote ---

Sandra Lean is a self publicist, she is also an internet troll who spent years running around websites promoting the Mitchell case to anyone who would listen.  One of her best known fictional characters was jigsawman, a name which she used to attack others with impunity on a forum called Fact & Myth.  She then went around telling anyone who would listen that she never uses any other user names.  You couldn't make it up!   @)(++(*

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version