Author Topic: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry  (Read 30758 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

"The answer is that no-one here believes the parents were directly involved in MM's disappearance" - G-Unit.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #331 on: December 03, 2018, 07:58:39 PM »
https://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/officer-says-leaks-made-to-force-mccanns-confession-26320440.html

No named sources there, just 'friends' of  Chief Inspector Olegário Sousa. He did accept there might be leaks, but he certainly had no proof;

And the leaks from “sources close to the investigation” which appear almost daily?

“They are undesirable. But it is difficult to establish who these ‘leaks’ are or where they are coming from. Information is probably not leaked on purpose. I believe sometimes things are said at an informal lunch after which a friend tells a friend who knows a journalist. But there’s no doubt, these leaks do complicate my job.”
http://www.theportugalnews.com/news/exclusive-chief-inspector-olegario-sousa/22774
Accept nothing
Believe no-one
Confirm everything

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #332 on: December 03, 2018, 08:33:30 PM »
No named sources there, just 'friends' of  Chief Inspector Olegário Sousa. He did accept there might be leaks, but he certainly had no proof;

And the leaks from “sources close to the investigation” which appear almost daily?

“They are undesirable. But it is difficult to establish who these ‘leaks’ are or where they are coming from. Information is probably not leaked on purpose. I believe sometimes things are said at an informal lunch after which a friend tells a friend who knows a journalist. But there’s no doubt, these leaks do complicate my job.”
http://www.theportugalnews.com/news/exclusive-chief-inspector-olegario-sousa/22774
What would constitute proof that you would accept then?
"The answer is that no-one here believes the parents were directly involved in MM's disappearance" - G-Unit.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #333 on: December 03, 2018, 10:19:30 PM »
What would constitute proof that you would accept then?

Someone owning up. Lots of people had information from the investigation; Portuguese and UK policemen, interpreters, translators and witnesses to name a few.
Accept nothing
Believe no-one
Confirm everything

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #334 on: December 03, 2018, 10:22:39 PM »
Someone owning up. Lots of people had information from the investigation; Portuguese and UK policemen, interpreters, translators and witnesses to name a few.
So as that’s unlikely to ever happen you can carry on denying the PJ ever leaked, how convenient.
"The answer is that no-one here believes the parents were directly involved in MM's disappearance" - G-Unit.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Aftermath of the Leveson Inquiry
« Reply #335 on: December 03, 2018, 10:32:16 PM »
So as that’s unlikely to ever happen you can carry on denying the PJ ever leaked, how convenient.

I said it can't be proved. I don't know whether they leaked or not.
Accept nothing
Believe no-one
Confirm everything