From the 5th or 7th May, cant exactly remember which, but its a fact, that the mantra of * there is no evidence, (not a shred of) that Madeleine has come to any *significant harm*. John Mccann was one of the first to say this on a video interview. the Mccanns repeated this ad infinitum for years. I think it was in every single interview they ever did, wors for word,one of the criticisms of the Mccanns were that their interviews were plastic rehear..d and directed, never from the heart, ever. They worked in the main to pre agreed questions and spoke as a PR team rather than distraught parents of a missing child. They got annoyed at awkward questions, they were always *furious* in the papers. They never answered questions directly but deflected. one could easily just make up answers to a false interviewer because the public had rehear..d their own answers! Alwys the same, always the same exact words used to describe things. is that normal Did they do all this off their own backs or was someone telling them what to do? and say? the mantra never changed for YEARS and became cumbersome and boring,and unbelievable, a couple with a missing child surely would just speak their minds as and when they wanted? So why so stilted?
!
That there is no evidence she has come to harm is an oxymoron in itself and an insult to readers given the context of everything
