Author Topic: Wouldn't Robert Murat Have Been Easier to Frame Than the McCanns ?  (Read 1686 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

From an earlier post :

If a patsy was to be found wouldn't it have been better to focus on Murat ? He was already an arguido, had no high-powered legal support, as the McCanns did, and certainly no public support. He was also not quite Englsh yet not quite Portuguese therefore allowing both parts of the community to apportion the blame elsewhere.

No matter which way you slice it, if the PJ were looking for a scapegoat for this crime, rather than following  where the evidence led them, then logically the McCanns, with their legal and political support network, would have been the last people they would have considered to implicate.

Discuss.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Carana

Re: Wouldn't Robert Murat Have Been Easier to Frame Than the McCanns ?
« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2013, 11:00:12 AM »
Well, Debunker had posted his thoughts and I happened to agree with him... but it's gone.

First though, in what sense do you mean "framed"?