Author Topic: Are the McCanns too sensitive to alternative points of view?  (Read 118792 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Are the McCanns too sensitive to alternative points of view?
« Reply #540 on: October 12, 2015, 09:26:29 PM »
Aw c'mon. Cipriano is a staple. You know like rice is to China so Cipriano is to the faithful.
It hasn't been rolled out for a while so let's have a laugh.

You must admit it's a good example to support faiths idea that you don't need evidence to find someone guilty

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Are the McCanns too sensitive to alternative points of view?
« Reply #541 on: October 12, 2015, 09:35:36 PM »
You must admit it's a good example to support faiths idea that you don't need evidence to find someone guilty

So remind us all, on what grounds were they convicted ?

Online misty

Re: Are the McCanns too sensitive to alternative points of view?
« Reply #542 on: October 12, 2015, 09:52:59 PM »
I think the McCanns would be very sensitive to opposing points of view in Portugal. It seems that, even when a court finds you innocent, the powers-that-be can have that decision altered without even having a re-trial.
Ana Saltao is still a victim of the justice system. Meanwhile, those who libelled her on the TV, including police professionals, are cleared of all charges.
http://www.flashvidas.pt/a_ferver/detalhe/tribunal_absolve_julia_pinheiro.html

Beating the prosecution must be rather like trying to win the jackpot on Euromillions with only one line of numbers.


Offline slartibartfast

Re: Are the McCanns too sensitive to alternative points of view?
« Reply #543 on: October 12, 2015, 09:59:08 PM »
Back on topic please.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.